The Most Important Building Index You Never Read

pub The Most Important Building Index You Never ReadUnless you’re an architect, you’ve probably never heard of the Architectural Billings Index. Every month the American Institute of Architects sends out a survey to its members about how much they’re billing. 

Some economists say it can be one of the more effective ways to measure recovery, because it measures commercial construction before it even starts. The good news is that the index was up by quite a bit in July — by about two points.

That comes off a rough couple of years for the ABI and the industry as a whole. “The ballpark, as I recollect, was that somewhere between 5 per cent and 10 per cent of firms have closed down,” said Kermit Baker, chief economist at the American Institute of Architects.

Like everyone else in the industry, architects expressed only cautious optimism. “Business conditions at design firms remain quite volatile,” said Mr. Baker. “While this recent uptick is encouraging, this state of the industry is likely to persist for a while as we continue to receive a mixed bag of feedback on the condition of the design market from improving to flat to being paralyzed by uncertainty.”

Indeed, on the heels of that good cheer, comes the news that Chicago architect Lucien Lagrange, who designed the ambitious 535 West End Avenue, is going under.

Of course, it might also do to recall the doomsaying of Michael A. McCarthy, a partner in Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, in 1992. “It will never be the same again,” said Mr. McCarthy. “Beginning work in this city in 1964, I’ve had the chance to see a lot of ups and downs. This one, to me, is without a doubt the worst.”

Thus, we bring you a slightly more informal index of how some of the city’s major architects and their projects have been battered during the recession.

SLIDESHOW: Architects the Recession Claimed

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President