Build Your Dream Cell Phone – Bug Labs Partners With AT&T

keyboard bug 0 Build Your Dream Cell Phone   Bug Labs Partners With AT&TThe small New York firm, Bug Labs, has become the darling of the nation’s biggest carriers, who hope developers will use Bug Labs tools to create lots of cool new gadgets, inspiring consumers to purchase more of the expensive data that runs over their networks.

In the last month, Bug Labs announced partnerships AT&T and Verizon. The deals will make it easier for anyone to invent a device using Bug Labs hardware and integrate it with the nation’s two largest mobile networks. 

Here’s the draw for AT&T and Verizon. They want more devices, like the iPad, that convince consumers to spend another $20-30 a month on data. Instead of waiting for Apple or Samsung to invent the next great category of device, the big networks are embracing the idea of open source.

Bug Labs CEO Peter Semmelhack envisions a world in which third-party developers create new gadgets that can be easily prototyped using Bug Labs’ toolkit. Some will be specialized devices created by companies to fill a specific need, say monitoring the alcohol intake of long distance truckers or the direction of prevailing winds for forest fire fighters.

Other devices will be aimed at consumers, and the ones that find a mass market could then make the transition to selling on bigger platforms like Verizon and AT&T’s websites and retail outlets.

“Right now there are hundreds of thousands of apps but only a few dozen mobile devices,” Semmelhack tells The Observer. “We want to create an ecosystem for mobile hardware that is just as robust as the one which exists for software.”

Once upon a time, this would have sounded like a noble pipe dream. But with the nation’s two biggest carriers on board, and more likely eager to partner, Semmelhack’s open source revolution may soon become a reality.

“New York was once a hub for creating new hardware,” says Semmelhack. “I hope to make that a part of the city’s DNA in the future.”

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President