Gawker’s Low Blow: Will Ladybug-Gate Help O’Donnell?

odonnell02 Gawkers Low Blow: Will Ladybug Gate Help ODonnell? The world now knows that Christine O’Donnell doesn’t wax. Or at least she didn’t three years ago.

A man who claims to have spent the night with U.S. Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell has given Gawker a detailed account of the Halloween sexual encounter. O’Donnell was wearing a ladybug costume, and the dude claims she drunkenly seduced him into letting her spend the night at his place. In a rare move for one of its high-profile exclusive pieces, Gawker published it under an anonymous byline.

The account reads like a college junior relaying a trumped-up tale of near-conquest in the bedroom over his fraternity email listserv — the narrative is written with that kind of forced confidence that mostly comes off as pathetic.

If the subject were anyone apart from the political punching bag of the moment (Gawker’s favorite tag for her is “masturbating witch-hobbit”) the story would have stayed in the annals of one adolescent male’s memory, indistinct from other sexual activity he may have participated in. Instead, the encounter at hand happened to be with Christine O’Donnell, giving him the power to let hundreds of thousands — and possibly, in the next few days, millions? — of readers in on his otherwise unimportant story.

The guy insists that “It really didn’t take very long for Christine to make her move.” Charming. Naturally, he wasn’t surprised when O’Donnell face-raped him as soon as they got to the bar. He drops the obligatory admission that she’s a “cougar” and tells us she’s “aggressive,” in case we had missed the insinuation. “She’d set her sights on me from the beginning,” he boasted after explaining that they had met the previous summer. He claims that she wanted a “good-looking young man” to accompany her to political events, as if that’s what she believed would further her career.

“I won’t get into the nitty gritty details of what happened between the sheets,” the anonymous Philadelphian said. If only! He scoffs at her virginal claims until she backs up and explains she’s a “born-again virgin.” And then comes the climactic, if you will, detail of the post: “When her underwear came off, I immediately noticed that the waxing trend had completely passed her by.”

To our narrator, this is a sign of sexual inexperience — a “big turnoff” — so he declines any other sexual advances and goes to bed. He didn’t give her a kiss goodbye in the morning, but of course she was still super into him, anyway: “she didn’t take a hint and emailed or called a few more times over the next couple of weeks before I was forced to make it clear to her that I wasn’t interested.”

But while this exposé of O’Donnell’s grooming habits might seem like a disaster for her already shaky Senate campaign (ah, for the days of boxers vs. briefs), there’s also a chance it will buy her some sympathy votes. Not every member of the electorate waxes, after all. Even in Delaware.

nfreeman [at] observer.com | @nfreeman1234

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President