Longreads Aggregates Articles You Never Get Around to Reading

l Longreads Aggregates Articles You Never Get Around to ReadingAfter making too many frustrating 40-minute commutes with an empty Instapaper queue, Mark Armstrong, director of content at internet startup Bundle, decided to ask for some help. His idea: convince both consumers and producers of news to rally around the concept of “longreads.” Armstrong snapped up the @longreads Twitter handle and hyped the #longreads Twitter tag — for use on tweeted links to lengthy stories. Now, the 1,200 examples of long-form journalism collected by the Twitter account are available on Longreads.com, which launched this morning.

The project attempts to merge the explosion of new media consumption platforms with the eternal tradition of the raconteur — the writer who needs an immense amount of space to tell a story. “Now that we have a time, a place, and a format where the best journalism in the world can thrive online, the appetite for it is obvious,” Armstrong writes on his Tumblr page. “It’s on the iPhone, iPad and Kindle. It’s on apps like Instapaper, where you can read offline and on your own terms. And it’s from writers and reporters who can expand our worldview and move us to tears — or better yet, action — in 7,000 words.”

Each piece on the Longreads site indicates the number of words and, using the average reading speed, the approximate amount of time it will take to read. For instance, the Vanity Fair piece that went up today about House Republican leader John Boehner contains 4220 words, and will take 17 minutes to read. Sounds like our daily commute on the F train! Perfect!

Already, the Twitter feeds for The Atlantic, Esquire, and Lapham’s Quarterly have taken to adding #longreads when tweeting links to beefier pieces, and The Awl and Capital New York have longreads tags to bundle all that time-consuming goodness in one place. 

Since we know you all have iPhones with Instapaper apps, get going on this! 

nfreeman [at] observer.com | @nfreeman1234

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President