<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Brokaw Balks: You Won&#8217;t Get a Tweet Out of Technophobic Tom!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/11/brokaw-balks-you-wont-get-a-tweet-out-of-technophobic-tom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Brokaw Balks: You Won&#8217;t Get a Tweet Out of Technophobic Tom!</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/brokaw-balks-you-wont-get-a-tweet-out-of-technophobic-tom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:08:38 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/brokaw-balks-you-wont-get-a-tweet-out-of-technophobic-tom/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/brokaw-balks-you-wont-get-a-tweet-out-of-technophobic-tom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/104668589.jpg?w=210&h=300" />On April 15, 2009, the @tombrokaw account sent out the <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/tombrokaw/status/1527582032">following tweet</a>: "White House says Obama 'unaware' of tea parties! LOL!"</p>
<p>This contains vital information, yes, but @tombrokaw has nothing to do with the real Tom Brokaw, the NBC news lifer. The real Tom Brokaw, it turns out, has no Twitter account and no Facebook account, he <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=101&amp;aid=193829">tells the Poynter Institute</a> in an interview. The real Tom Brokaw is holding tight to the bygone age when we still cherished our privacy. The real Tom Brokaw is really scared of this social networking stuff.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"I have too many invasions of my privacy as it is," he told Poynter. "I'm thinking about just signing up so I can share things with my granddaughters a little more, but I worry I'll read things on their Facebook that will unnerve me."</p>
<p>Yes, Tom, those terrible pictures of us that we can't remove from Facebook <em>are</em>&nbsp;unnerving! Take those awful things down, "friends." But his thoughts on this crazy "Twitter" thing that's got the kids in a tizzy makes him seem, well, a bit out of touch.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>As for Twitter? He doesn't believe it's taken form yet journalistically. "I don't get Twitter," Brokaw said. "I know that it's very popular and that it's a quick way of getting a text blast out, so to speak, but an awful lot of it seems to be... just stuff that fills air."&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah, so that's what all those things on my Twitter feed are: "text blasts, so to speak." We can't wait to get on Twitter and go fill the air with some texts blasts, so to speak &mdash; even if Tom Brokaw won't see them.</p>
<p>Well, at least <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/tombrokaw">@tombrokaw</a> will. Whoever that dude is.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/104668589.jpg?w=210&h=300" />On April 15, 2009, the @tombrokaw account sent out the <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/tombrokaw/status/1527582032">following tweet</a>: "White House says Obama 'unaware' of tea parties! LOL!"</p>
<p>This contains vital information, yes, but @tombrokaw has nothing to do with the real Tom Brokaw, the NBC news lifer. The real Tom Brokaw, it turns out, has no Twitter account and no Facebook account, he <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=101&amp;aid=193829">tells the Poynter Institute</a> in an interview. The real Tom Brokaw is holding tight to the bygone age when we still cherished our privacy. The real Tom Brokaw is really scared of this social networking stuff.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"I have too many invasions of my privacy as it is," he told Poynter. "I'm thinking about just signing up so I can share things with my granddaughters a little more, but I worry I'll read things on their Facebook that will unnerve me."</p>
<p>Yes, Tom, those terrible pictures of us that we can't remove from Facebook <em>are</em>&nbsp;unnerving! Take those awful things down, "friends." But his thoughts on this crazy "Twitter" thing that's got the kids in a tizzy makes him seem, well, a bit out of touch.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>As for Twitter? He doesn't believe it's taken form yet journalistically. "I don't get Twitter," Brokaw said. "I know that it's very popular and that it's a quick way of getting a text blast out, so to speak, but an awful lot of it seems to be... just stuff that fills air."&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah, so that's what all those things on my Twitter feed are: "text blasts, so to speak." We can't wait to get on Twitter and go fill the air with some texts blasts, so to speak &mdash; even if Tom Brokaw won't see them.</p>
<p>Well, at least <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/tombrokaw">@tombrokaw</a> will. Whoever that dude is.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/brokaw-balks-you-wont-get-a-tweet-out-of-technophobic-tom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/104668589.jpg?w=210&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
