<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; The New York Times and Twitter: Now Worth the Same!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-new-york-timesem-and-twitter-now-worth-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>The New York Times and Twitter: Now Worth the Same!</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-new-york-timesem-and-twitter-now-worth-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:00:29 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-new-york-timesem-and-twitter-now-worth-the-same/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/emthe-new-york-timesem-and-twitter-now-worth-the-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/2755v28-max-250x250.png" />With its market cap at about $1.1 billion today, The New York Times Co. is now, by one measure, smaller than nanoblogging platform Twitter, Business Insider <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-is-now-worth-about-as-much-as-the-new-york-times-2010-11">pointed out</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Techcrunch <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/27/whats-the-street-price-of-twitter-nearly-1-6-billion/">reported</a> last week that insider info puts the social networking site's value around $1.6 billion, even though the company has yet to bring in substantial revenue.<br />The last official evaluation, in September 2009, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/16/twitter-closing-new-venture-round-with-1-billion-valuation/">estimated</a> Twitter's worth at $1.1 billion</p>
<p>The closeness in value is just the latest sign of the way we read news now, and of the closing gap between the nation's paper of record and the sounding board for 100 million people tweeting. Twitter is four years old, and <em>The Times</em> is going on 160.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/2755v28-max-250x250.png" />With its market cap at about $1.1 billion today, The New York Times Co. is now, by one measure, smaller than nanoblogging platform Twitter, Business Insider <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-is-now-worth-about-as-much-as-the-new-york-times-2010-11">pointed out</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Techcrunch <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/27/whats-the-street-price-of-twitter-nearly-1-6-billion/">reported</a> last week that insider info puts the social networking site's value around $1.6 billion, even though the company has yet to bring in substantial revenue.<br />The last official evaluation, in September 2009, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/16/twitter-closing-new-venture-round-with-1-billion-valuation/">estimated</a> Twitter's worth at $1.1 billion</p>
<p>The closeness in value is just the latest sign of the way we read news now, and of the closing gap between the nation's paper of record and the sounding board for 100 million people tweeting. Twitter is four years old, and <em>The Times</em> is going on 160.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-new-york-timesem-and-twitter-now-worth-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/2755v28-max-250x250.png" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
