<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Will a Ubiquitous Kate Middleton Save Magazine Sales?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/11/will-a-ubiquitous-kate-middleton-save-magazine-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Will a Ubiquitous Kate Middleton Save Magazine Sales?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/will-a-ubiquitous-kate-middleton-save-magazine-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:33:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/will-a-ubiquitous-kate-middleton-save-magazine-sales/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/will-a-ubiquitous-kate-middleton-save-magazine-sales/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/6a00d83451595d69e201348915f197970c-800wi.jpg?w=225&h=300" />Americans may not have greeted Prince William's engagement to Kate Middleton with the fanatical attention of the Brits, but that's not stopping the princess-to-be's takeover of U.S. glossies. <em>Women's Wear Daily</em>'s Memo Pad <a href="http://www.wwd.com/media-news/fashion-memopad/memo-pad-3386863?src=rss/media/20101122">writes </a>that magazine editors are "salivating" over the potential for Middleton covers, with many already in the works.</p>
<p><em>People </em>magazine editor Larry Hackett put Middleton on the cover of his magazine pre-engagement, and reports said the couple's inclusion was a boon for newsstand sales. "This story involves an incredibly attractive girl who is young and going  to be a princess," Hackett told <em>WWD</em>. "I sure hope she does well. I mean, all this story is  lacking is a dragon."</p>
<p>The question remains whether Middleton will become a staple on the magazine cover circuit - on the level of an Angelina Jolie, as one source suggested to <em>WWD</em>. If editors can tap into<a href="/2010/culture/unlike-women-world-over-prince-william-cant-remember-how-long-hes-been-kate-video"> the jealousy of William-seeking women</a> who've longed for a fairy-tale wedding, perhaps they might be on to something.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman at observer.com&nbsp;</a>|<a href="http://twitter.com/#NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/6a00d83451595d69e201348915f197970c-800wi.jpg?w=225&h=300" />Americans may not have greeted Prince William's engagement to Kate Middleton with the fanatical attention of the Brits, but that's not stopping the princess-to-be's takeover of U.S. glossies. <em>Women's Wear Daily</em>'s Memo Pad <a href="http://www.wwd.com/media-news/fashion-memopad/memo-pad-3386863?src=rss/media/20101122">writes </a>that magazine editors are "salivating" over the potential for Middleton covers, with many already in the works.</p>
<p><em>People </em>magazine editor Larry Hackett put Middleton on the cover of his magazine pre-engagement, and reports said the couple's inclusion was a boon for newsstand sales. "This story involves an incredibly attractive girl who is young and going  to be a princess," Hackett told <em>WWD</em>. "I sure hope she does well. I mean, all this story is  lacking is a dragon."</p>
<p>The question remains whether Middleton will become a staple on the magazine cover circuit - on the level of an Angelina Jolie, as one source suggested to <em>WWD</em>. If editors can tap into<a href="/2010/culture/unlike-women-world-over-prince-william-cant-remember-how-long-hes-been-kate-video"> the jealousy of William-seeking women</a> who've longed for a fairy-tale wedding, perhaps they might be on to something.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman at observer.com&nbsp;</a>|<a href="http://twitter.com/#NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/will-a-ubiquitous-kate-middleton-save-magazine-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/6a00d83451595d69e201348915f197970c-800wi.jpg?w=225&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
