New York Times Decides Tweeting Is Not A Job

wwwery New York Times Decides Tweeting Is Not A JobBut it is a beat, apparently! On Monday Jennifer Preston announced via Twitter that she was stepping down as the New York Times’s Social Media Editor and will go back to reporting…on social media. Today Poynter spoke with Preston, who elaborated on her Tweet-evangelizing role:

While some journalists at the Times were already using those sites, there wasn’t a newsroom-wide understanding of why the tools mattered. “At the beginning there was some resistance among my colleagues about using these tools,” Preston said.

As social media editor, Preston met regularly with section editors and reporters to demonstrate how they could use social media tools not just to promote content but to build communities and attract new audiences.

Preston had nice things to say about her job, but we can’t say we envy her. The prospect of having to sell a bird-bedecked, Bieber-beloved platform to a room of established, busy, and maybe crusty journalists makes our palms sweat. But since a few major news stories unfolded on Twitter, everyone got wise and now microblogging needs no spokesperson.

The Gray Lady’s social media duties will fall to Aron Pilhofer and the interactive newsroom, who are tasked with re-purposing and upgrading existing social media for journalistic purposes, like creating Twitter filters to help reporters trace stories back to sources.

“Part of the advantage is that if there’s a tool that we don’t have or we don’t need or doesn’t exist, we’ll simply build it,” Pilhofer said by phone. “This is something that we’re uniquely positioned to do. We can make the business case for these projects and say, ‘Here’s why this is important and here’s why it’s an editorial priority.'”

We bet there’s some money in that for a newsy coder!

 

 

 

 

 

Article continues below
More from Business & Tech
People take part in a protest outside the New York Times on February 26, 2017 in New York. The White House denied access Frebuary 24. 2017 to an off-camera briefing to several major US media outlets, including CNN and The New York Times. Smaller outlets that have provided favorable coverage however were allowed to attend the briefing by spokesman Sean Spicer. The WHCA said it was "protesting strongly" against the decision to selectively deny media access. The New York Times said the decision was "an unmistakable insult to democratic ideals," CNN called it "an unacceptable development," and The Los Angeles Times warned the incident had "ratcheted up the White House's war on the free press" to a new level. / AFP / KENA BETANCUR (Photo credit should read KENA BETANCUR/AFP/Getty Images)
NYT Now Earns More From Readers Than Advertisers—Thanks, Trump