<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; No New Taxes for Brooklyn Bridge Park (But What About a Parking Lot?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2010/12/no-new-taxes-for-brooklyn-bridge-park-but-what-about-a-parking-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>No New Taxes for Brooklyn Bridge Park (But What About a Parking Lot?)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/12/no-new-taxes-for-brooklyn-bridge-park-but-what-about-a-parking-lot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:30:14 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/12/no-new-taxes-for-brooklyn-bridge-park-but-what-about-a-parking-lot/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Chaban</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/12/no-new-taxes-for-brooklyn-bridge-park-but-what-about-a-parking-lot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bbp1.jpg?w=300&h=194" />Oh, those entitled Brooklyn Heightsies. They decry <a href="/2010/real-estate/brooklyn-bridge-park-opens-plans-housing-park-are-flux">the thought of condos lining Brooklyn Bridge Park</a> -- thus supporting the new greensward's ongoing maintenance -- because it would block their harbor views. Yet they also do not want to pay new taxes to help fund the park, even though the proposal <a href="/2008/politics/connor-squadron-numbers">helped State Senator Dan Squandron win his election</a>.</p>
<p>Well, it looks like <a href="http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/33/52/dtg_bbpalternatives_2010_12_24_bk.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBrooklynPaper-Headlines+%28The+Brooklyn+Paper%3A+Headlines%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">the proposed tax has been sunk because it would dip into the city's coffers</a>. <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/bridge_park_taxes_eyed_YwSn4knpL1EIzn8WrRRfnK?CMP=OTC-rss&amp;FEEDNAME=">Local businesses did not seem to appreciate the tax plan much</a>, either.</p>
<p>The most popular alternative remains taxing the non-profit <a href="/2010/real-estate/jehovahs-witnesses-save-brooklyn-bridge-park">properties owned by the Jehovah's Witnesses and soon bound for sale</a>. An outside consultancy is considering other alternatives, which include, according to the <em>Brooklyn Paper</em> and the <em>Post</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Advertising or sponsorships</li>
<li>Additional concessions</li>
<li>Fee-based recreation</li>
<li>Special events</li>
<li>A parking lot</li>
<li>General fundraising, &agrave; la Central Park</li>
</ul>
<p>Some combination of these plans could be implemented, or the condo plans could simply move forward. Whatever the case, the Bloomberg administration has made clear time and again that <a href="/2010/real-estate/brooklyn-willoughby-square-latest-libertarian-park">the park must be self-sustaining</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bbp1.jpg?w=300&h=194" />Oh, those entitled Brooklyn Heightsies. They decry <a href="/2010/real-estate/brooklyn-bridge-park-opens-plans-housing-park-are-flux">the thought of condos lining Brooklyn Bridge Park</a> -- thus supporting the new greensward's ongoing maintenance -- because it would block their harbor views. Yet they also do not want to pay new taxes to help fund the park, even though the proposal <a href="/2008/politics/connor-squadron-numbers">helped State Senator Dan Squandron win his election</a>.</p>
<p>Well, it looks like <a href="http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/33/52/dtg_bbpalternatives_2010_12_24_bk.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBrooklynPaper-Headlines+%28The+Brooklyn+Paper%3A+Headlines%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">the proposed tax has been sunk because it would dip into the city's coffers</a>. <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/bridge_park_taxes_eyed_YwSn4knpL1EIzn8WrRRfnK?CMP=OTC-rss&amp;FEEDNAME=">Local businesses did not seem to appreciate the tax plan much</a>, either.</p>
<p>The most popular alternative remains taxing the non-profit <a href="/2010/real-estate/jehovahs-witnesses-save-brooklyn-bridge-park">properties owned by the Jehovah's Witnesses and soon bound for sale</a>. An outside consultancy is considering other alternatives, which include, according to the <em>Brooklyn Paper</em> and the <em>Post</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Advertising or sponsorships</li>
<li>Additional concessions</li>
<li>Fee-based recreation</li>
<li>Special events</li>
<li>A parking lot</li>
<li>General fundraising, &agrave; la Central Park</li>
</ul>
<p>Some combination of these plans could be implemented, or the condo plans could simply move forward. Whatever the case, the Bloomberg administration has made clear time and again that <a href="/2010/real-estate/brooklyn-willoughby-square-latest-libertarian-park">the park must be self-sustaining</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/12/no-new-taxes-for-brooklyn-bridge-park-but-what-about-a-parking-lot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bbp1.jpg?w=300&#38;h=194" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
