<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Google Takes Aim At Spam With Help From Stack Overflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2011/01/google-takes-aim-at-spam-with-help-from-stack-overflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Google Takes Aim At Spam With Help From Stack Overflow</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/01/google-takes-aim-at-spam-with-help-from-stack-overflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:30:39 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/01/google-takes-aim-at-spam-with-help-from-stack-overflow/</link>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2011/01/google-takes-aim-at-spam-with-help-from-stack-overflow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/spam-man_0.jpg?w=240&h=300" />Last week <a href="/2011/tech/demand-media-ipo-brewing-google-takes-content-farms">Google's anti-spam chief Matt Cutts</a> posted a blog about a change the company planned to make in their search algorithm.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The intention was to cut down on spammy stuff created by content farms or scraped and repasted by SEO sites.&nbsp;</p>
<p>It was big news because it coincided with the IPO of content farm king Demand Media, who specifically singled out changes to Google search as a threat to their company's bottom line.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Today the change went into effect. In a <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/algorithm-change-launched/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+mattcutts/uJBW+(Matt+Cutts:+Gadgets,+Google,+and+SEO)">blog post Cutts singled out Jeff Atwood and the folks at Stack Overflow</a> for their help.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Interestingly, this post clarified who the change will effect most. "The net effect is that searchers are more likely to see the sites that wrote the original content rather than a site that scraped or copied the original site&rsquo;s content," wrote Cutts.&nbsp;</p>
<p>That makes it seem like sites that repost aggregate content will be affected more than content farms like Demand Media which produce original, if low quality content.&nbsp;</p>
<p>bpopper [at] observer.com | @benpopper</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/spam-man_0.jpg?w=240&h=300" />Last week <a href="/2011/tech/demand-media-ipo-brewing-google-takes-content-farms">Google's anti-spam chief Matt Cutts</a> posted a blog about a change the company planned to make in their search algorithm.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The intention was to cut down on spammy stuff created by content farms or scraped and repasted by SEO sites.&nbsp;</p>
<p>It was big news because it coincided with the IPO of content farm king Demand Media, who specifically singled out changes to Google search as a threat to their company's bottom line.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Today the change went into effect. In a <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/algorithm-change-launched/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+mattcutts/uJBW+(Matt+Cutts:+Gadgets,+Google,+and+SEO)">blog post Cutts singled out Jeff Atwood and the folks at Stack Overflow</a> for their help.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Interestingly, this post clarified who the change will effect most. "The net effect is that searchers are more likely to see the sites that wrote the original content rather than a site that scraped or copied the original site&rsquo;s content," wrote Cutts.&nbsp;</p>
<p>That makes it seem like sites that repost aggregate content will be affected more than content farms like Demand Media which produce original, if low quality content.&nbsp;</p>
<p>bpopper [at] observer.com | @benpopper</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/01/google-takes-aim-at-spam-with-help-from-stack-overflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/spam-man_0.jpg?w=240&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
