Grimm Proposes Arming Members of Congress, Staffers

michael grimm 3 Grimm Proposes Arming Members of Congress, StaffersA sharp-eyed reader passed along the following article in Roll Call about how members with experience in law enforcement are responding to the Giffords shooting.

Staten Island congressman Michael Grimm, who, as we have noted has extensive experience in the FBI, floated a novel approach to keeping elected officials safe.

States Roll Call: “Grimm wants Congress to go a step further. He’s proposing allowing Members of Congress or their staffers to be trained and deputized to carry a weapon and act as their own security force.”

We reached out to Grimm’s office for clarification yesterday and today, and they said that since the new congressman is at the G.O.P. retreat in Baltimore he would be unable to come to the phone.

However, Grimm spokeswoman Carol Danko said that the proposal would include members and staffers who are interested being deputized by the Department of Justice to essentially serve as Deputy U.S. Marshals. Doing so would allow them to carry weapons in the District of Columbia and in all 50 states without needing to register in each locale.

Danko said that Grimm has also hired as a staffer a former NYPD detective who will work in the district office and provide security, and has already given Grimm’s district staff an introductory security workshop. (The Roll Call article notes that as a former FBI agent, Grimm “has long lived with the possibility that one of the people he met in his deep-undercover job might seek revenge on him.”)

We reached out to Joe LaSorsa, a former secret service agent charged with presidential protection who now operates his own security firm, for comment.

“Ludicrous,” he said. “They are not properly trained.  They are not security professionals. The only thing it would accomplish is they would muddy the waters and people would get hurt. You want to provide security, hire security.”

Danko said that Grimm had not taken up his proposal with Speaker John Boehner’s office, so it looks like a long-shot at this point.


Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President