<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; &#8216;Rolling Stone&#8217; Corrects Itself on Bieber&#8217;s Abortion Stance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2011/02/rolling-stone-corrects-itself-on-biebers-abortion-stance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:17:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>&#8216;Rolling Stone&#8217; Corrects Itself on Bieber&#8217;s Abortion Stance</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/02/rolling-stone-corrects-itself-on-biebers-abortion-stance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:40:14 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/02/rolling-stone-corrects-itself-on-biebers-abortion-stance/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2011/02/rolling-stone-corrects-itself-on-biebers-abortion-stance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/109201189.jpg?w=200&h=300" />Justin Bieber's forthcoming <em>Rolling Stone</em> cover has already merited a correction; the teen star's stance on abortion, definitely an important thing about which to know, is not quite as absolutist as it initially appeared! The <a href="http://popdust.com/2011/02/16/justin-bieber-political-naif-or-brilliant-clintonian-triangulator/">quote from the initial interview, via Popdust</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I really don't believe in abortion," Bieber says. "It's like killing a  baby?" How about in cases of rape? "Um. Well, I think that's really sad,  but everything happens for a reason. I guess I haven't been in that  position, so I wouldn't be able to judge that."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/justin-bieber-talks-sex-politics-music-and-puberty-in-new-rolling-stone-cover-story-20110216"><em>Rolling Stone</em>'s corrected quote,</a> which acknowledges an "editing error," reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Um. Well, I  think that's really sad, but everything happens for a  reason. <strong>I don't  know how that would be a reason.</strong> I guess I haven't been  in that  position, so I wouldn't be able to judge that."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The edited version reflects Bieber's uncertainty and confusion about the issue, rather than a glib absolutism <a href="http://gawker.com/#!5762056/justin-bieber-lets-his-pro+life-and-pro+canada-freak-flags-fly">(as it first appeared)</a>. No word yet from the magazine's representatives on how the error came to their attention, though writer <a href="http://twitter.com/nessiecorp/status/38002723991470081">Vanessa Grigoriadis Tweeted</a>: "online version removed a line" and printed the line in full, yesterday. (She also noted that Bieber, due to his far-reaching cultural influence, <a href="http://twitter.com/nessiecorp/status/38002183102271488">"deserves to be asked all questions,"</a> including ones about thorny political issues.)</p>
<p>ddaddario@observer.com :: @DPD_</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/109201189.jpg?w=200&h=300" />Justin Bieber's forthcoming <em>Rolling Stone</em> cover has already merited a correction; the teen star's stance on abortion, definitely an important thing about which to know, is not quite as absolutist as it initially appeared! The <a href="http://popdust.com/2011/02/16/justin-bieber-political-naif-or-brilliant-clintonian-triangulator/">quote from the initial interview, via Popdust</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I really don't believe in abortion," Bieber says. "It's like killing a  baby?" How about in cases of rape? "Um. Well, I think that's really sad,  but everything happens for a reason. I guess I haven't been in that  position, so I wouldn't be able to judge that."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/justin-bieber-talks-sex-politics-music-and-puberty-in-new-rolling-stone-cover-story-20110216"><em>Rolling Stone</em>'s corrected quote,</a> which acknowledges an "editing error," reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Um. Well, I  think that's really sad, but everything happens for a  reason. <strong>I don't  know how that would be a reason.</strong> I guess I haven't been  in that  position, so I wouldn't be able to judge that."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The edited version reflects Bieber's uncertainty and confusion about the issue, rather than a glib absolutism <a href="http://gawker.com/#!5762056/justin-bieber-lets-his-pro+life-and-pro+canada-freak-flags-fly">(as it first appeared)</a>. No word yet from the magazine's representatives on how the error came to their attention, though writer <a href="http://twitter.com/nessiecorp/status/38002723991470081">Vanessa Grigoriadis Tweeted</a>: "online version removed a line" and printed the line in full, yesterday. (She also noted that Bieber, due to his far-reaching cultural influence, <a href="http://twitter.com/nessiecorp/status/38002183102271488">"deserves to be asked all questions,"</a> including ones about thorny political issues.)</p>
<p>ddaddario@observer.com :: @DPD_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/02/rolling-stone-corrects-itself-on-biebers-abortion-stance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/109201189.jpg?w=200&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
