Silver, Gottfried Declare Support for Medicaid Redesign

silver yellow back Silver, Gottfried Declare Support for Medicaid RedesignCrisis averted: it looks like a potential collision between Governor Andrew Cuomo and Assembly Democrats over the Medicaid redesign proposal may not happen, after all.

Speaker Sheldon Silver has released a statement in support of the plan, and Assemblyman Richard Gottfried–the proposal’s most outspoken opponent thus far–has reconsidered his position, and now says that he approves of the redesign plan as well.

“I commend the members of the Medicaid Redesign Team for their work to find substantial savings in Medicaid while preserving quality care for New Yorkers,” said Silver. “We look forward to reviewing the MRT’s final report and reiterate the Assembly’s commitment to delivering an on-time budget that reflects the overwhelming consensus that emerged from the MRT process.”

Gottfried, a Democrat who also served on Cuomo’s task force to design the proposal, expressed his doubts about the plan when he told the media last night that he thought the savings estimates were overly optimistic. Cuomo met this resistance with grim determination, telling Fred Dicker this morning that he expected opposition from those interested in protecting “the status quo”–including Democrats in the Assembly, where the proposal is headed next. The governor hinted that he wasn’t opposed to dropping the playing-nice routine, but the threat of force may be unnecessary in light of Gottfried’s new position.

“Despite the concern I voiced yesterday about the speed with which the MRT voted, I believe, on the whole, that the final report contains needed reforms that will place our Medicaid system on a path to long term financial sustainability while safeguarding quality healthcare for New Yorkers in need, the elderly and the disabled,” said Gottfried, who abstained in yesterday’s vote.

The redesign package will go in front of the state Legislature in the next month as a proposed amendment to the fiscal year 2011-12 budget.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President