<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Is Affordable Housing Gentrifying Brooklyn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2011/03/is-affordable-housing-gentrifying-brooklyn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Is Affordable Housing Gentrifying Brooklyn?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/03/is-affordable-housing-gentrifying-brooklyn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:23:28 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/03/is-affordable-housing-gentrifying-brooklyn/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Coyne</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2011/03/is-affordable-housing-gentrifying-brooklyn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/domino2_2.jpg?w=300&h=199" />Is the city's public-private affordable housing model&mdash;the Community Preservation Corp., a group of 70 banks and insurance companies, in particular&mdash;expediting Brooklyn's gentrification?</p>
<p>The <em>Gotham Gazette</em> seems to think so. The <a href="http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/housing/20110222/10/3469" target="_blank"><em>Gazette</em> investigated</a> the city's publicly available property transaction records and found that since 2007, 65 percent of the $701 million invested in Brooklyn went to luxury development and that the CPC, which gets subsidies from the city as well as profits on luxury development, has <a href="http://www.gothamgazette.com/graphics/2011/02/investments_lg.jpg" target="_blank">focused its affordable housing developments in places like East New York</a>, where, according to the <em>Gazette</em>, almost half of adults over 16 years of age have dropped out of the labor force and the median household income hovers around $25,000. Not to mention the <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/02/in_cold_blood_y.php" target="_blank">crime</a>.</p>
<p>This fact is being obscured because the New Domino, the <a href="/2010/real-estate/domino-theory-brooklyn-dems-face-over-mammoth-williamsburg-project" target="_blank">always contentious</a> former-sugar-factory-come-massive-housing-development on Williamsburg's waterfront being developed by the CPC, is going to have 100 percent of its affordable housing within the development. What's more, to further placate the affordable housing-niks, the CPC signed what essentially amounts to a <a href="/2010/real-estate/domino-promise-affordable-housing-more-pledge-0" target="_blank">non-binding promise</a> to keep 30 percent of the properties below market rates, with the minimum at 20 percent. Well, that and the positive PR the CPC enjoys throughout the borough&mdash;the <em>Gazette </em>points to several Brooklyn community development corporations and Catholic organizations that stepped up to the plate for the CPC at meetings in August.</p>
<p>This should lead to an even more interesting discussion as current&nbsp;rent regulation, already embroiled in a heated political battle, is set to expire in June.</p>
<p><em>mcoyne@observer.com</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/domino2_2.jpg?w=300&h=199" />Is the city's public-private affordable housing model&mdash;the Community Preservation Corp., a group of 70 banks and insurance companies, in particular&mdash;expediting Brooklyn's gentrification?</p>
<p>The <em>Gotham Gazette</em> seems to think so. The <a href="http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/housing/20110222/10/3469" target="_blank"><em>Gazette</em> investigated</a> the city's publicly available property transaction records and found that since 2007, 65 percent of the $701 million invested in Brooklyn went to luxury development and that the CPC, which gets subsidies from the city as well as profits on luxury development, has <a href="http://www.gothamgazette.com/graphics/2011/02/investments_lg.jpg" target="_blank">focused its affordable housing developments in places like East New York</a>, where, according to the <em>Gazette</em>, almost half of adults over 16 years of age have dropped out of the labor force and the median household income hovers around $25,000. Not to mention the <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/02/in_cold_blood_y.php" target="_blank">crime</a>.</p>
<p>This fact is being obscured because the New Domino, the <a href="/2010/real-estate/domino-theory-brooklyn-dems-face-over-mammoth-williamsburg-project" target="_blank">always contentious</a> former-sugar-factory-come-massive-housing-development on Williamsburg's waterfront being developed by the CPC, is going to have 100 percent of its affordable housing within the development. What's more, to further placate the affordable housing-niks, the CPC signed what essentially amounts to a <a href="/2010/real-estate/domino-promise-affordable-housing-more-pledge-0" target="_blank">non-binding promise</a> to keep 30 percent of the properties below market rates, with the minimum at 20 percent. Well, that and the positive PR the CPC enjoys throughout the borough&mdash;the <em>Gazette </em>points to several Brooklyn community development corporations and Catholic organizations that stepped up to the plate for the CPC at meetings in August.</p>
<p>This should lead to an even more interesting discussion as current&nbsp;rent regulation, already embroiled in a heated political battle, is set to expire in June.</p>
<p><em>mcoyne@observer.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/03/is-affordable-housing-gentrifying-brooklyn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/domino2_2.jpg?w=300&#38;h=199" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
