<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; The New &#039;Newsweek,&#039; Week Two: Famous Author Praises TV Star Using Made-Up Lingo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2011/03/the-new-newsweek-week-two-famous-author-praises-tv-star-using-madeup-lingo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>The New &#039;Newsweek,&#039; Week Two: Famous Author Praises TV Star Using Made-Up Lingo</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/03/the-new-newsweek-week-two-famous-author-praises-tv-star-using-madeup-lingo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:14:27 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/03/the-new-newsweek-week-two-famous-author-praises-tv-star-using-madeup-lingo/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2011/03/the-new-newsweek-week-two-famous-author-praises-tv-star-using-madeup-lingo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/106963119_0.jpg?w=215&h=300" />Tina Brown has made good, in her way, <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2011/03/06/a-new-newsweek.html">on her promise</a> to decode "crackling, confusing digital dots": <em>Newsweek</em> this week synthesizes Charlie Sheen's every <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/13150557/highlight/155795">manic Ustream</a> with Bret Easton Ellis's theory, <a href="http://twitter.com/BretEastonEllis/status/29523424414">long promulgated over Twitter</a>, of "Empire" and "post-Empire" entertainments. Mr. Ellis, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-03-12/bret-easton-ellis-how-charlie-sheen-is-giving-us-what-we-want/">whose piece is live on The Daily Beast</a>, connects the dots of his writing and Mr. Sheen's public pronouncements, though the piece itself is all crackle and confusion.</p>
<p>Mr. Ellis praises Mr. Sheen for his "post-Empire" stardom, a state of being that is both extremely ironic and self-effacing and "more raw, less diluted." According to the author of <em>American Psycho</em>, Mr. Sheen is simultaneously rejecting stardom entirely and embracing it as a means of spreading a message--the point would be fairly straightforward if Mr. Ellis ever defined what, precisely, "Empire" is.</p>
<p>The term "Empire," often preceded by "Post-" is used 28 times in Ellis's nearly 1800-word piece, an average of just over twice a paragraph. The term is never defined, save for constant comparisons to other things that are, or were, vaguely zeitgeist-y: Tiger Woods is "super-Empire," as is Aaron Sorkin's script for <em>The Social Network</em>. The Kardashian sisters, the cast of <em>Jersey Shore</em>, and Mr. Sheen are all "Post-Empire." So it's something having to do with reverence, or irreverence? Where does giving a famous author money to fulminate about an already-peaked entertainment news story while trying to make a new buzzword happen fall on that continuum? We're guessing "Empire," though Mr. Ellis's promise that a <a href="http://twitter.com/BretEastonEllis/status/47132743578038272">"hard COMPLETE version"</a> will be available Wednesday (presumably on Mr. Ellis's own web presence, as <em>Newsweek</em> has already been printed and shipped) may be Post-a-lot-of-things.</p>
<p>ddaddario@observer.com :: @DPD_</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/106963119_0.jpg?w=215&h=300" />Tina Brown has made good, in her way, <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2011/03/06/a-new-newsweek.html">on her promise</a> to decode "crackling, confusing digital dots": <em>Newsweek</em> this week synthesizes Charlie Sheen's every <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/13150557/highlight/155795">manic Ustream</a> with Bret Easton Ellis's theory, <a href="http://twitter.com/BretEastonEllis/status/29523424414">long promulgated over Twitter</a>, of "Empire" and "post-Empire" entertainments. Mr. Ellis, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-03-12/bret-easton-ellis-how-charlie-sheen-is-giving-us-what-we-want/">whose piece is live on The Daily Beast</a>, connects the dots of his writing and Mr. Sheen's public pronouncements, though the piece itself is all crackle and confusion.</p>
<p>Mr. Ellis praises Mr. Sheen for his "post-Empire" stardom, a state of being that is both extremely ironic and self-effacing and "more raw, less diluted." According to the author of <em>American Psycho</em>, Mr. Sheen is simultaneously rejecting stardom entirely and embracing it as a means of spreading a message--the point would be fairly straightforward if Mr. Ellis ever defined what, precisely, "Empire" is.</p>
<p>The term "Empire," often preceded by "Post-" is used 28 times in Ellis's nearly 1800-word piece, an average of just over twice a paragraph. The term is never defined, save for constant comparisons to other things that are, or were, vaguely zeitgeist-y: Tiger Woods is "super-Empire," as is Aaron Sorkin's script for <em>The Social Network</em>. The Kardashian sisters, the cast of <em>Jersey Shore</em>, and Mr. Sheen are all "Post-Empire." So it's something having to do with reverence, or irreverence? Where does giving a famous author money to fulminate about an already-peaked entertainment news story while trying to make a new buzzword happen fall on that continuum? We're guessing "Empire," though Mr. Ellis's promise that a <a href="http://twitter.com/BretEastonEllis/status/47132743578038272">"hard COMPLETE version"</a> will be available Wednesday (presumably on Mr. Ellis's own web presence, as <em>Newsweek</em> has already been printed and shipped) may be Post-a-lot-of-things.</p>
<p>ddaddario@observer.com :: @DPD_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/03/the-new-newsweek-week-two-famous-author-praises-tv-star-using-madeup-lingo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/106963119_0.jpg?w=215&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
