Is It Iced Coffee Weather, GQ?

Mila Kunis

Mila Kunis


Is this the best GQ cover ever?

We think so, maybe!

Mila Kunis (whom we’ve really warmed up to since her delivery of the line “Was I good?!” in Black Swan) was shot by Terry Richardson, who showed remarkable restraint by not exclusively posing her with her mouth agape.

Also, the iced coffee: Genius. It’s seasonal without being corny, like this duck. Less pedophilic and less phallic than an ice cream cone, but still a little bit phallic. It connotes both sexy post-coital times and quotidian middlebrow career girl life–look, she can’t even get dressed for work without a Venti! And stimulants. Stimulating!

Gchat observers more libidinous than we pointed out that the coffee is the color of her skin and her undies are the color of what biology dictates is underneath them. Gchat observers  more culturally fluent than we pointed out that the iced coffee refers to Nancy Botwin of Weeds, a sex symbol for stoners and HBO subscribers, which pretty much sums up GQ’s target demo.

God love the art director who photoshopped out the garish branding of the mermaid seal but kept the straw Starbucks green. It’s the fulcrum of the composition and signifier enough for the distinctly American school of ubiquity to which every starlet aspires.

Oh except not Mila, of course. From the Q&A you’ll learn she’s a nerd who is so down to earth and hates watching her figure and just about every other celebrity profile cliche.

Including the one where the male interviewer creepily treats the interview as a date–a return to form for the  magazine, which had recently been running unconventional celebrity profiles written by women. Who also sort of seemed to be on dates with their subjects. Why does that work so much better when it’s a neurotic female writer? Is it even possible to write a celebrity profile without Janet Malcolm breathing down your neck?


Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President