Robots and iPhones and Sneezing Radios at 'Talk to Me' Exhibit

suwappu lineup dentsu london haitsu 480x320 Robots and iPhones and Sneezing Radios at 'Talk to Me' Exhibit


At the opening of Talk to Me, a great exhibition in MoMA’s design department about the communication and interaction between people and objects, people were taking pictures with their iPhones of flat screens projecting the show’s “works.” Usually The Observer doesn’t notice how many people have their faces buried in their mobile devices, but in this case, it was all too meta to ignore. A swarm of people was crammed into a tightly packed hallway, with Glenn Lowry, the museum’s director, presiding over the entrance. The wall text he was standing by read, “Whether openly and actively, or in subtle subliminal ways, things talk to us,” but he didn’t feel much like talking.

“Hi. Here’s the curator,” he said, directing us to Paola Antonelli, and then disappeared into the crowd.

“Have you been inside yet?” Ms. Antonelli said.

“Not yet.”

“Good luck,” she said, gesturing to the crowd.

Nearby, Jason Silva was explaining augmented reality to Heather Graham. They were standing by an advertisement for Suwappu, little toys that, when you point an iPhone at them, interact with their environment on the phone’s screen (which is a lot better than, you know, actually playing with them).

“It’s the digital reality and the real world combining so that we become something more than just human,” he said.

“That’s amazing,” she said.

In the exhibit were objects like an artificial biological clock, a phantom recorder that explores the phenomenon of phantom limbs, a floppy legs portable hard drive that props itself up on four legs when it senses spilled liquid and the Gesudheit Radio, which “sneezes” every so often to free itself of dirt. Little robots were rolling along the floor with signs that said, “HELP ME: point me in the right direction.”

Downstairs was a boozy party. A woman was standing next to Monument to Balzac wearing a white kimono with a strange printed pattern. It was QR codes. People were snapping pictures with their iPhones.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President