Wall Street Journal Blames Scotland Yard for News International Phone Hacking

wsj Wall Street Journal Blames Scotland Yard for News International Phone Hacking

WSJ reporters sneak News International reporting into the captions, via Mother Jones

The Wall Street Journal‘s News Corp. ownership is at last showing, in the paper’s first editorial on the phone hacking meltdown,”News and its Critics,” published this morning.

The column kicks off with a bang, blaming poor policing for News Corp.’s illegal reporting tactics.

“Phone-hacking is illegal, and it is up to British authorities to enforce their laws. If Scotland Yard failed to do so adequately when the hacking was first uncovered several years ago, then that is more troubling than the hacking itself,” they wrote.

We would argue that the most troubling is News International’s alleged bribery of Scotland Yard, but that’s just us.

The editorial’s main argument is that it’s so unfair that other media outlets–the Journal‘s competitors, don’t forget–are using News of the World’s meltdown to tarnish the reputation of good News Corp. journalists , which, hello, no one is doing. By contrast, they’re reporting (perhaps with above average astonishment and enthusiasm) on how high within News Corp. and governing bodies the rot had spread.

We also trust that readers can see through the commercial and ideological motives of our competitor-critics. The Schadenfreude is so thick you can’t cut it with a chainsaw. Especially redolent are lectures about journalistic standards from publications that give Julian Assange and WikiLeaks their moral imprimatur. They want their readers to believe, based on no evidence, that the tabloid excesses of one publication somehow tarnish thousands of other News Corp. journalists across the world.

In the totally tenuous Wikileaks-Phone Hacking analogy, News of the World is the Bradley Manning, not the Julian Assange, and no one gave him a free pass.

Anyway, read the rest of it for a tour of excuses, everything from “everyone else was doing it” to “you guys are just jealous.” And don’t miss the entirely gratuitous love letter to (and photo of!) their departed publisher, the lifetime Murdoch acolyte, Les Hinton, who resigned over the weekend after PR firm Edelman was brought in for emergency housecleaning.

It’s said that Rupert Murdoch rewards loyalty, so no matter how this shakes out, the WSJ editorial board will land ok.

 

 

 

 

Article continues below
More from Politics
(FILES): These two file photos show then Labor Secretary Thomas Perez (L) speaking to reporters about the minimum wage for federal contractors at the White House in Washington, DC, on Feburary 12, 2014; and Minnesota Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison (R) during a press conference about Islamophobia at the National Press Club on May 24, 2016 in Washington, DC.


US Democrats, licking their wounds from last year's election debacle, will pick a new leader on February 25, 2017 to take the fight to President Donald Trump and his Republicans. The race to chair the Democratic National Committee (DNC) features front-runners Tom Perez, a Hispanic-American and former secretary of labor under Barack Obama who is the establishment pick, and Keith Ellison, a black Muslim congressman from the party's progressive wing who has left open the prospect of pushing to impeach Trump. / AFP / Mandel NGAN AND Brendan SMIALOWSKI        (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN,BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images)
Sanders 2020 Just Became Much More Likely With Tom Perez as DNC Chair