Debating Israel in NY-9: A History of Outrage

Debating Israel with a congressman from Brooklyn isn’t easy, then or now.

Asked about the tone of the debate over Israel-hawk credentials in the upcoming special congressional election to replace Anthony Weiner, James Zogby, head of the Arab American Institute, recalled a run-in he had more than 20 years ago.

“In 1988, when I raised the plank at the Democratic National Convention, I went up against Chuck Schumer,” said Mr. Zogby, who was a delegate from the Jesse Jackson campaign at the time. “They were telling me, ‘Zogby, if you even raise this at the convention you’ll never have a place in the Democratic Party again’ and blah blah blah. The plank was actually quite modest,” Mr. Zogby recalled. “The plank actually read, ‘mutual recognition, territorial compromise and self-determination for both people.’

“Schumer, after I spoke at the convention, he got up to the platform and he said, ‘Zogby is duplicitous, Zogby is this and Zogby is that.’ Afterward, he came up and put his arm around me and said, ‘[You] have no idea how much money you made for me back home.’” Read More

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    Correction:

    The latter policy position of final borders based on the green line with swaps has been the United State’s policy position since at least Clinton, for God’s sake. its controversial only in the same sense as saying that the veracity of the moon landings ins controversial. Supporters of a maximalist Israeli position that would deny the possibilty of a Palestinian state find it controversial – no one actually interested in peace does.

  2. […] day is not yet done, but so far in the race to replace Anthony Weiner in the U.S. Congress the subject of Israel has yet to come up! Mazel tov to the both Bob Turner and David […]

  3. […] “This district, as we now know, is heavily Jewish. Schumer would have killed him in a primary,” said Skurnik. […]