Do Not Ride Your Bike in the Hurricane (But If You Do, Don’t Forget Goggles)

Maybe this is common sense, but maybe people who take their lives in their hands every time they ride a bike in New York are short on that—this reporter included.

Still, with the M.T.A. suspending service across the entire transit system, a first in the agency’s 38-year history, The Observer couldn’t help but wonder: Might biking be a viable option to get around town for the majority of New Yorkers who do not own cars? It took less than a minute to disabuse us of this crazy notion.

First, we called some hurricane experts, so to speak, Cycle World in Miami. Donald Cuadra took our call and could immediately tell The Observer had never lived through a hurricane, let alone biked through one. “It’s bad, it’s very bad,” he said.

“It’s not so much the rain, it’s the wind. It’s one thing if you’re going against wind that’s 20 miles an hour—and then suddenly a 60-mile-an-hour gust hits you, you’re off the bike immediately. That’s guaranteed, you’re gonna fall. And if the wind doesn’t get you, all the debris—even a simple, little two-foot branch, it’s basically a projectile going 60 miles an hour.”

For a local perspective, we turned to downtown institution Gotham Bikes, which has been in Tribeca for three decades. Taj Sallid, a salesman there, said he did not think many people would be biking, but if they did, he provided some handy advice. First off, avoid the West Side Highway bike superhighway.

“The most popular route in terms of commuting in our city is the West Side greenway path, and that is going to be trecherous, absolutely, during a hurricane,” Mr. Sallid said. “If you just experience some of the winds during a mild rain storm over there, I’ve seen people with full-carbon bikes, disk wheels just flip over in a standard windy day. So in terms of a hurricane, that would make it pretty precarious over there.” Also, it’s smack in the middle of the flood zone.

“I guess my second suggestion would be on the streets, during high winds, the debris is pretty crazy.”

mchaban [at] | @MC_NYC

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President