If I Were Driving This Train: One N Rider’s Platform for Fixing the M.T.A.

Revamp funding, crank the A.C. and harvest some oysters, stat

56441681 If I Were Driving This Train: One N Riders Platform for Fixing the M.T.A.

This is fixable.

The first thing on my platform is that the next M.T.A. chief need not be a train buff. He or she—or me specifically, since I’m hereby throwing my name out there—has to appreciate the economic essentiality of the authority, which moves the equivalent of New Jersey’s population (8.5 million, give or take) every weekday. But this is not a Lionel set; this is dollars and nonsense.

The next chief should know more about transit financing, particularly the warren navigated in simply keeping the four-pronged monster afloat. As it stands now, it’s a ready-made punch line, with the nation’s largest transit system held hostage to a dysfunctional Albany.

The way it works at present, as this newspaper explained in a 2009 profile of then-new, now-outgoing chief Jay Walder, the organization basically runs on debt (sound familiar?). Instead of giving the M.T.A. enough long-term income sources to sustain itself over time—on fares, tolls and taxes—the state has settled upon a system in which funding for repairs and new construction, like the Second Avenue Subway and the No. 7 line extension, runs dry every five years or so (i.e., barring a prostitution scandal, every gubernatorial administration or so). What happens then is that whoever is in charge of the M.T.A. must go to Albany—to whomever is in charge there—and plead for a new tax; or go to the public to eventually borrow from the state’s general fund.

Barring these scenarios, it’s the familiar fare hikes and service cuts—including the epochal ones from the spring of 2010 that wiped out the W and V subway lines, along with 18 bus routes, and upped the commuting times for millions of New Yorkers who pay into the system through both taxes and fares.

Financing-wise, the M.T.A. is a crapshoot, much like relying on the G on the weekend: it’s there; there are signs for it—even schedules, if you look hard enough—but it doesn’t work well because what undergirds it is unreliable. Abandon hope, all ye who swipe here.

Thus the run of grim statistics, showing a system with a $900 million gap in its operating budget; a $9 billion shortfall in its construction plans; and a $2.1 billion-plus budget deficit for good measure (plus, fresh plans to borrow another $7 billion), and tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow …

When we all have to take the N or the 1 or the 4, 5, 6, a line that carries more people daily than the subways of Chicago, L.A. and Boston put together, such dollar signs mean little (one bad commute is a tragedy, a million is a statistic). They’re not tangible to the everyday commuter, as the misery of the trips to and fro seem to trump all.

So restructuring the financial funding situation would be the first criterion for any M.T.A. head. And that means taking some of the year-to-year decision making away from Albany and creating a five-year animal for the operating budget. Therefore, less borrowing and fewer drastic measures like fare hikes (three in three years now) and deep service cuts. Nothing really changes otherwise.

With such a financial funding restructuring that divorces the authority from Albany power plays, there should be a focus on fresh revenues that don’t come from commuters. Enough! Especially with the hikes in monthlies. Laudably, Mr. Walder and the Bloomberg administration in recent years pushed congestion pricing—charging drivers to use central business districts like we charge train and bus riders. It didn’t take, amid bizarre opposition where cars were lofted to First Amendment-level rights. But I would resurrect it. Look to London (not right now, but in general, when it comes to transit). We debate bike lanes for BroBos while Western Europe innovates (and China and Japan build the fastest trains on earth).

And if congestion pricing won’t take, I would propose a tourist tax of some sort, a surcharge levied through the Port Authority (master of airports, the bus terminals and most bridges) for stopping by but not paying in.

Finally, financially speaking, the new M.T.A. chief needs an understanding of the vast real estate holdings of the authority, which include train yards, rights of way and buildings (big ones, too—Grand Central Station, anyone?). Work the commercial real estate industry for prospective buyers—Canadian pension funds are pretty ravenous these days—and sell off all nonessential properties.

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    I just paiid $21.86 for an i P a d2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her

    Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $38.74 there arriving tomorrow

    by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again.

    Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $658 which

    only cost me $62.80 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from,

    http://EgoWin.com

  2. ROBERT says:

    To suggest taxing middle and working class motorist more than is already being done is insane. Especially in light of the fact that MTA union pay scales and work rules have been bleeding the agency dry for decades. A train sweeper makes $26 an hour plus $10-$15 a year in benefits. Lets put that into prospective. $40 an hour * 35 per week * 52 weeks per year = $72,800 per person per year for a job that has a market pay rate of $14 an hour including benefits and that is generous 14*35*52 =$25,480. That’s right we are paying a low skill position TRIPLE the pay rate in NYC for the same position.
    Increased taxes in the past has just led to LARGER RAISES from TWU UNION workers. The arbitrator who handed out 12% raises in the midst of the worst of the financial collapse cited the NEW MTA TAXES just pushed in the mta bailout plan. THE SOLUTION IS TO
    1) RIGHT SIZE THE WORKFORCE AND PAY SCALE FOR ALL WORKERS AT THE MTA
    2) CHANGES OUTDATED WORK RULES SUCH AS TWO PERSON TRAIN OPERATION
    3) Close all token booths and reasign workers to work station security to prevent fare evasion and vandalism
    4) FIX WHAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED AN LIVE WITHIN THE MTA MEANS
    5) RAISE THE FARE – WHY? then the riders will feel the real sting of the unions unfair work rules
    6) Hire management consultants and improve every outdated work process and shift the focus to providing the best quality customer experience

    One quick change that would save millions is to install garbage compactor can s so that trash can be picked up less often from station. Today we pay a worker to go from station to station $78,000+ with benefits to empty trash can every few hours.

    As for new  revenue, fine those who break mta rules and motorists who block bus lanes and bus stops. Add a $25 mta surcharge to all motorist moving violations.
    Middle class new yorkers are being squeezed out by labor union greed

    1. ROBERT says:

      ONE MORE THING
      Any new money or any money that is in excess of the mta budget (the surplus a few years back was not the mta MAKING MONEY but rather more tax revenue coming in then projected) needs to be in a lock box to pay down MTA debt and can not be used for any other purposes such as raises for already well paid workers, or political feel good items such as free fare week.  Nearly all of the MTA bailout projected revenue went union raises.

      The cost of interest is choking the MTA. The next Boss needs to be someone who knows how to transform and organization through better management and oversight. Worker oversight is poor at the mta then when something goes wrong the line worker is to blame when in reality it is the managers fault

      1. ROBERT says:

        The mta also could work with developers and the city on new real estate projects along it’s subway lines. For instance the area along the west end (D) line from 86th street until stillwell ave CI is under developed due to long commutes into the city. West end express service in exchange for a piece of the up-value of the property would be a win win for riders.