<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Without Attribution: How You Responded To Our Bachelor and Bachelorette Power Lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2011/08/without-attribution-how-you-responded-to-our-bachelor-and-bachelorette-power-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Without Attribution: How You Responded To Our Bachelor and Bachelorette Power Lists</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/08/without-attribution-how-you-responded-to-our-bachelor-and-bachelorette-power-lists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:02:55 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/08/without-attribution-how-you-responded-to-our-bachelor-and-bachelorette-power-lists/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=176737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/heartexplosion.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-177579" title="HeartExplosion" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/heartexplosion.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="284" /></a>SO: THAT HAPPENED. </strong>On Monday and Tuesday, we rolled out our 2011 <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/the-free-agent-list-2011s-50-media-power-bachelors/" target="_blank">Media Power Bachelors</a> and <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/media-power-bachlorettes/" target="_blank">Media Power Bachelorettes</a>. You responded with a lot, in the way of Tweets, comments, vocal arguments, outrage, praise, and even in one case, a single-serving site that falls somewhere between utterly brilliant and generally disturbing. But the best stuff didn't see the light of day so much as the shadowy cave-like email in-boxes from whence these lists emerged. Until now. After the jump, some statistics, some post-game highlights, some omissions, and of course: a whole lot of id, shipped directly our way over email.<!--more--></p>
<p><strong>WORD COUNT: </strong></p>
<p>Bachelorettes: 6,142 Words.<br />
Bachelors: 4,874 Words.</p>
<p><strong>ON WHERE TO START WITH AN OMISSIONS LIST: </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>"Well, you have to look outside the coke parties."</p>
<p><strong>NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WANTED THEIR PHOTOS CHANGED AND/OR SENT PHOTOS TO USE:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>20: 15 Bachelorettes and 5 Bachelors.</p>
<p><strong>NUMBER OF EMAILS ASKING ABOUT NATE FREEMAN'S SEXUAL ORIENTATION DESPITE CLEARLY NOTING WHAT A CHARMER OF THE LADIES HE UNDOUBTEDLY IS, REASON GIVEN BEING BECAUSE HE'S "SO NATTILY ATTIRED": </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Just one, amazingly.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>EMAILED, TWEETED, OR IM'D REQUESTS FOR A MIXER OF BOTH LISTS: </strong></p>
<p>At least nine. It'll happen. Because we're announcing it tomorrow.</p>
<p><strong>BEST REQUEST TO CHANGE A PICTURE:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>"Is there anyway you can change my sister's picture back so she stops bitching and she also looks weird in her current picture? PS: Anyway I can get some of those girls' numbers?"</p>
<p><strong>IF YOU'RE ATTEMPTING TWITTER HUMOR AT THE EXPENSE OF OUR LISTS:</strong></p>
<p>You do it like <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/michaelorell/status/103523001760354305" target="_blank">this</a>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESPONSE:</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/angeljimenez/status/103149591922360320" target="_blank">Jesus Diaz</a>.</p>
<p><strong>MOST OFT-MENTIONED "SHOCKING OMISSION" FROM BACHELORETTES LIST:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Dealbreaker's Bess Levin. We even got an email from a JP Morgan guy.</p>
<p><strong>MOST DEPRESSING OMISSION, BACHELORS LIST:</strong></p>
<p>Carles of <a href="http://WWW.HIPSTERRUNOFF.COM" target="_blank">Hipster Runoff</a>. He DM'd: "I am s00000 eligible, bb. :-("</p>
<p><strong>RESPONSES DEVOTED TO BREAKDOWNS BY RACE:</strong></p>
<p>"Too bad for anyone looking for actual color <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/rafat/status/103156555058388992" target="_blank">in their life</a>."</p>
<p>"For the first time I saw people of color on those listicles, so I shall <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/lyneka/status/103578310897967104" target="_blank">not complain</a>."</p>
<p><strong>ANGRY "PLEASE REMOVE THAT LINE" EMAILS: </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Just one.</p>
<p><strong>POSTS DEVOTED TO FACTCHECKING THE LISTS EXTERNALLY: </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Three!</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE TO LISTS, DM DIVISION:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>"You have to do a TOTAL REDO of the Bachelors list. God. That slideshow looked like the cantina scene from Star Wars."</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE TO LISTS, COMMENTS DIVISION:</strong></p>
<p>"<a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/media-power-bachlorettes/#comment-288223509" target="_blank">I WOULD HAVE SEX WITH ALL THIS WHITE GIRL.</a>" (Or as one <em>Observer </em>editor noted: "It's the ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US of media people.")</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE TO LISTS, <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/08/nikki_finke_rea.php" target="_blank">NIKKI FINKE</a> DIVISION:</strong></p>
<p>"What the hell is <em>wrong</em> with people?"</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE PHOTOSHOP:</strong></p>
<p>It could <a href="http://ninety9.tumblr.com/post/9042001767/power-lists-still-getting-made-good-for-them" target="_blank">happen</a>.</p>
<p><strong>NUMBER OF PEOPLE CONTACTED BY AGENTS POST-LIST APPEARANCE: </strong></p>
<p>Three!</p>
<p><strong>MOST FAMOUS PERSON TO ACKNOWLEDGE HAVING MADE THE LIST:</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/maureenoco/status/103110093431775233" target="_blank">reportedly</a> taken <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/donlemoncnn/status/103135007429763074" target="_blank">Don Lemon</a>.</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE AND KEY VALIDATION OF THIS ENTIRE ENDEAVOR:</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="http://mediapowercoupler.herokuapp.com/" target="_blank">Media Power Couple Coupler</a>. Or as it was commonly known yesterday morning around the office: "Wow."</p>
<p><strong>MOST CLEAR EXPLANATION/RATTING OUT OF <em>THE OBSERVER</em>'S POWER LIST METHODOLOGY:</strong></p>
<p>"...your relative geographical position on the dart board we use to make editorial decisions like this and the corresponding steadiness of the <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/08/why_the_observer_is_going_all.html" target="_blank">assigning editor's aim</a>." <strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>BEST RESPONSES FROM NOTIFIED PARTICIPANTS THAT WEREN'T ABOUT DEVORAH ROSE AND CAKE:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>"I’m guessing that in your omniscience, you guys knew all that already."</li>
<li>"As flattering at this sounds, I'm wondering if whether I'm an appropriate person  for the list. I was recently listed in your own paper's "Media Power Couple"  slide show, and am still happily with [REDACTED], my power-boyfriend."</li>
<li>"oy."</li>
<li>"<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande';">Oh, dear."</span></li>
<li>"Thanks, and please don’t let this piece be too snarky."</li>
<li>"That said, what is a 'media bachelor'? And why am I on it? (Do you need  me to confirm that I am unmarried? I'm in fact unmarried.)"</li>
<li>"DON'T INCLUDE ME ON A LIST JUST DON'T oh shit <a href="http://www.fosterkamer.com/post/8997918818" target="_blank">oh god</a>"</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>YOU'RE WELCOME?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>"Thank you for not making me sound like a self-involved prat."</li>
<li>"It's funny how much better looking the single people are than the couples. I guess everyone must just let themselves go when they get married. "</li>
<li>"Where is that photo from btw?? I have no recollection of it and I haven't worn that cardigan (or that shirt?? I don't even know what shirt that is) in probably 3 or 4 years???!!?"</li>
<li>On attempting to reply to an email thread about the list: "[I JUST DELETED THREE PARAGRAPHS IN THIS SPACE]"</li>
<li>"My parents will be so proud!"</li>
<li>From a parent of a list-maker: "ps i hung up a copy of the bio on your from the 50 best.......on my bulletin board on my desk.  so happy for you"</li>
<li>On acceptance of listed party-submitted photo: "One of the most terrifying things about being an occasional presence in the Gawker/NYmag.com/Observer universe is that in the event I get written about but not photographed, they invariably pull a picture from Patrick McMullan, a person who seems to have an unparalleled ability to make me look totally unfuckable."</li>
<li>IM'd was a request for "Power Swtich-Hitters: Girls Who Lezzed Out Reading Observer Lists bc i LOVE ____"</li>
<li>Also, on acceptance of photo: "it's almost time for a winter boyfriend."</li>
<li>"I WILL FWD TO MY RABBI!"</li>
<li>"My ability to use this list to increase my sluttiness is greatly decreased by  the [photo] you're using now; even my mom thinks so."</li>
<li>"A girl at _______, to me: 'Wait, were you on that bachelor list? you were the ______  slide!' We kinda almost made out."</li>
<li>
<div>"And, man, you guys, [REDACTED] is going to <em>hurt</em> you."</div>
</li>
</ul>
<div><em><span style="line-height: normal;">fkamer@observer.com </span></em><span style="line-height: normal;">| @<a href="http://www.twitter.com/weareyourfek" target="_blank">weareyourfek</a></span></div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/heartexplosion.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-177579" title="HeartExplosion" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/heartexplosion.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="284" /></a>SO: THAT HAPPENED. </strong>On Monday and Tuesday, we rolled out our 2011 <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/the-free-agent-list-2011s-50-media-power-bachelors/" target="_blank">Media Power Bachelors</a> and <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/media-power-bachlorettes/" target="_blank">Media Power Bachelorettes</a>. You responded with a lot, in the way of Tweets, comments, vocal arguments, outrage, praise, and even in one case, a single-serving site that falls somewhere between utterly brilliant and generally disturbing. But the best stuff didn't see the light of day so much as the shadowy cave-like email in-boxes from whence these lists emerged. Until now. After the jump, some statistics, some post-game highlights, some omissions, and of course: a whole lot of id, shipped directly our way over email.<!--more--></p>
<p><strong>WORD COUNT: </strong></p>
<p>Bachelorettes: 6,142 Words.<br />
Bachelors: 4,874 Words.</p>
<p><strong>ON WHERE TO START WITH AN OMISSIONS LIST: </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>"Well, you have to look outside the coke parties."</p>
<p><strong>NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WANTED THEIR PHOTOS CHANGED AND/OR SENT PHOTOS TO USE:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>20: 15 Bachelorettes and 5 Bachelors.</p>
<p><strong>NUMBER OF EMAILS ASKING ABOUT NATE FREEMAN'S SEXUAL ORIENTATION DESPITE CLEARLY NOTING WHAT A CHARMER OF THE LADIES HE UNDOUBTEDLY IS, REASON GIVEN BEING BECAUSE HE'S "SO NATTILY ATTIRED": </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Just one, amazingly.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>EMAILED, TWEETED, OR IM'D REQUESTS FOR A MIXER OF BOTH LISTS: </strong></p>
<p>At least nine. It'll happen. Because we're announcing it tomorrow.</p>
<p><strong>BEST REQUEST TO CHANGE A PICTURE:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>"Is there anyway you can change my sister's picture back so she stops bitching and she also looks weird in her current picture? PS: Anyway I can get some of those girls' numbers?"</p>
<p><strong>IF YOU'RE ATTEMPTING TWITTER HUMOR AT THE EXPENSE OF OUR LISTS:</strong></p>
<p>You do it like <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/michaelorell/status/103523001760354305" target="_blank">this</a>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESPONSE:</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/angeljimenez/status/103149591922360320" target="_blank">Jesus Diaz</a>.</p>
<p><strong>MOST OFT-MENTIONED "SHOCKING OMISSION" FROM BACHELORETTES LIST:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Dealbreaker's Bess Levin. We even got an email from a JP Morgan guy.</p>
<p><strong>MOST DEPRESSING OMISSION, BACHELORS LIST:</strong></p>
<p>Carles of <a href="http://WWW.HIPSTERRUNOFF.COM" target="_blank">Hipster Runoff</a>. He DM'd: "I am s00000 eligible, bb. :-("</p>
<p><strong>RESPONSES DEVOTED TO BREAKDOWNS BY RACE:</strong></p>
<p>"Too bad for anyone looking for actual color <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/rafat/status/103156555058388992" target="_blank">in their life</a>."</p>
<p>"For the first time I saw people of color on those listicles, so I shall <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/lyneka/status/103578310897967104" target="_blank">not complain</a>."</p>
<p><strong>ANGRY "PLEASE REMOVE THAT LINE" EMAILS: </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Just one.</p>
<p><strong>POSTS DEVOTED TO FACTCHECKING THE LISTS EXTERNALLY: </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Three!</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE TO LISTS, DM DIVISION:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>"You have to do a TOTAL REDO of the Bachelors list. God. That slideshow looked like the cantina scene from Star Wars."</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE TO LISTS, COMMENTS DIVISION:</strong></p>
<p>"<a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/media-power-bachlorettes/#comment-288223509" target="_blank">I WOULD HAVE SEX WITH ALL THIS WHITE GIRL.</a>" (Or as one <em>Observer </em>editor noted: "It's the ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US of media people.")</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE TO LISTS, <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/08/nikki_finke_rea.php" target="_blank">NIKKI FINKE</a> DIVISION:</strong></p>
<p>"What the hell is <em>wrong</em> with people?"</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE PHOTOSHOP:</strong></p>
<p>It could <a href="http://ninety9.tumblr.com/post/9042001767/power-lists-still-getting-made-good-for-them" target="_blank">happen</a>.</p>
<p><strong>NUMBER OF PEOPLE CONTACTED BY AGENTS POST-LIST APPEARANCE: </strong></p>
<p>Three!</p>
<p><strong>MOST FAMOUS PERSON TO ACKNOWLEDGE HAVING MADE THE LIST:</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/maureenoco/status/103110093431775233" target="_blank">reportedly</a> taken <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/donlemoncnn/status/103135007429763074" target="_blank">Don Lemon</a>.</p>
<p><strong>FAVORITE RESPONSE AND KEY VALIDATION OF THIS ENTIRE ENDEAVOR:</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="http://mediapowercoupler.herokuapp.com/" target="_blank">Media Power Couple Coupler</a>. Or as it was commonly known yesterday morning around the office: "Wow."</p>
<p><strong>MOST CLEAR EXPLANATION/RATTING OUT OF <em>THE OBSERVER</em>'S POWER LIST METHODOLOGY:</strong></p>
<p>"...your relative geographical position on the dart board we use to make editorial decisions like this and the corresponding steadiness of the <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/08/why_the_observer_is_going_all.html" target="_blank">assigning editor's aim</a>." <strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>BEST RESPONSES FROM NOTIFIED PARTICIPANTS THAT WEREN'T ABOUT DEVORAH ROSE AND CAKE:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>"I’m guessing that in your omniscience, you guys knew all that already."</li>
<li>"As flattering at this sounds, I'm wondering if whether I'm an appropriate person  for the list. I was recently listed in your own paper's "Media Power Couple"  slide show, and am still happily with [REDACTED], my power-boyfriend."</li>
<li>"oy."</li>
<li>"<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande';">Oh, dear."</span></li>
<li>"Thanks, and please don’t let this piece be too snarky."</li>
<li>"That said, what is a 'media bachelor'? And why am I on it? (Do you need  me to confirm that I am unmarried? I'm in fact unmarried.)"</li>
<li>"DON'T INCLUDE ME ON A LIST JUST DON'T oh shit <a href="http://www.fosterkamer.com/post/8997918818" target="_blank">oh god</a>"</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>YOU'RE WELCOME?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>"Thank you for not making me sound like a self-involved prat."</li>
<li>"It's funny how much better looking the single people are than the couples. I guess everyone must just let themselves go when they get married. "</li>
<li>"Where is that photo from btw?? I have no recollection of it and I haven't worn that cardigan (or that shirt?? I don't even know what shirt that is) in probably 3 or 4 years???!!?"</li>
<li>On attempting to reply to an email thread about the list: "[I JUST DELETED THREE PARAGRAPHS IN THIS SPACE]"</li>
<li>"My parents will be so proud!"</li>
<li>From a parent of a list-maker: "ps i hung up a copy of the bio on your from the 50 best.......on my bulletin board on my desk.  so happy for you"</li>
<li>On acceptance of listed party-submitted photo: "One of the most terrifying things about being an occasional presence in the Gawker/NYmag.com/Observer universe is that in the event I get written about but not photographed, they invariably pull a picture from Patrick McMullan, a person who seems to have an unparalleled ability to make me look totally unfuckable."</li>
<li>IM'd was a request for "Power Swtich-Hitters: Girls Who Lezzed Out Reading Observer Lists bc i LOVE ____"</li>
<li>Also, on acceptance of photo: "it's almost time for a winter boyfriend."</li>
<li>"I WILL FWD TO MY RABBI!"</li>
<li>"My ability to use this list to increase my sluttiness is greatly decreased by  the [photo] you're using now; even my mom thinks so."</li>
<li>"A girl at _______, to me: 'Wait, were you on that bachelor list? you were the ______  slide!' We kinda almost made out."</li>
<li>
<div>"And, man, you guys, [REDACTED] is going to <em>hurt</em> you."</div>
</li>
</ul>
<div><em><span style="line-height: normal;">fkamer@observer.com </span></em><span style="line-height: normal;">| @<a href="http://www.twitter.com/weareyourfek" target="_blank">weareyourfek</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/08/without-attribution-how-you-responded-to-our-bachelor-and-bachelorette-power-lists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/heartexplosion.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">HeartExplosion</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
