<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Welfare No More: Another Roosevelt Island Co-op Privitizes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2011/10/welfare-no-more-another-roosevelt-island-co-op-privitizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Welfare No More: Another Roosevelt Island Co-op Privitizes</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/10/welfare-no-more-another-roosevelt-island-co-op-privitizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:00:59 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/10/welfare-no-more-another-roosevelt-island-co-op-privitizes/</link>
			<dc:creator>Elise Knutsen</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=189006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Roosevelt Island was once known as Welfare Island. Although they shook the unfortunate the name back in 1973, it looks like <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204612504576611102982550640.html?mod=rss_newyork_real_estate">the community is taking another step to break from it's subsidized past</a>, The Wall Street Journal reports.<!--more--></p>
<p>Many of the highrises on Roosevelt Island were built as  affordable housing, under the Mitchell-Lama program. In recent years, some of the co-ops have left the program, resulting in a steep price increases that pay off for tenants but make the units unaffordable. The Rivercross co-op, however, has announced a plan that in theory satisfies all parties.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the case of the 365-unit Rivercross co-op, the board of the  38-year-old building has created a framework that will initially cap the  sale price of 80% of the units at $500 per square foot.</p>
<p>Of that $500, the building will take a "transfer fees" of $150, which  will allow it to subsidize the remaining 20% of units in the building,  keeping prices near Mitchell-Lama levels.</p></blockquote>
<p>In theory, everyone should be happy: residents keep paying relatively low rents and the building gets out of the beleaguered Mitchell-Lama program, allowing more funds to be freed for much-needed renovations. Not everyone is convinced, though.</p>
<p>Rivercross took out a $50 million dollar mortgage which will be used, among other things, to pay for the building's $15 million facelift. Current residents feel they have to agree to the pseudo-privatization to cover the loan.</p>
<blockquote><p>But some residents expressed concern that the co-op plans on using the  transfer fee to pay down the $50 million. Having already taken out the  loan leaves them little choice but to go ahead with privatization, these  people say.</p></blockquote>
<p>It's a free market, people. Get with the times, or go protest on Wall Street.</p>
<p><em>eknutsen@observer.com</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roosevelt Island was once known as Welfare Island. Although they shook the unfortunate the name back in 1973, it looks like <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204612504576611102982550640.html?mod=rss_newyork_real_estate">the community is taking another step to break from it's subsidized past</a>, The Wall Street Journal reports.<!--more--></p>
<p>Many of the highrises on Roosevelt Island were built as  affordable housing, under the Mitchell-Lama program. In recent years, some of the co-ops have left the program, resulting in a steep price increases that pay off for tenants but make the units unaffordable. The Rivercross co-op, however, has announced a plan that in theory satisfies all parties.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the case of the 365-unit Rivercross co-op, the board of the  38-year-old building has created a framework that will initially cap the  sale price of 80% of the units at $500 per square foot.</p>
<p>Of that $500, the building will take a "transfer fees" of $150, which  will allow it to subsidize the remaining 20% of units in the building,  keeping prices near Mitchell-Lama levels.</p></blockquote>
<p>In theory, everyone should be happy: residents keep paying relatively low rents and the building gets out of the beleaguered Mitchell-Lama program, allowing more funds to be freed for much-needed renovations. Not everyone is convinced, though.</p>
<p>Rivercross took out a $50 million dollar mortgage which will be used, among other things, to pay for the building's $15 million facelift. Current residents feel they have to agree to the pseudo-privatization to cover the loan.</p>
<blockquote><p>But some residents expressed concern that the co-op plans on using the  transfer fee to pay down the $50 million. Having already taken out the  loan leaves them little choice but to go ahead with privatization, these  people say.</p></blockquote>
<p>It's a free market, people. Get with the times, or go protest on Wall Street.</p>
<p><em>eknutsen@observer.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/10/welfare-no-more-another-roosevelt-island-co-op-privitizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
