Screw U.: College Loans a Rallying Point in Current Protests

1292696661 Screw U.: College Loans a Rallying Point in Current Protests

Student loans are a backdrop of the Occupy Wall Street Movement. (Photo: EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/Getty Images)

Angela Gelso graduated from the Massachusetts College of Art and Design in 2008. The school is a public one, and Ms. Gelso, who is from Georgia, took a year off between high school and college to live in Massachusetts and become eligible for reduced in-state tuition. She attended without financial assistance from her family but says she was too young to declare herself financially independent and secure federal loans. As such, her total amount of loans upon graduation—private ones—came to $60,000, owed to Citibank. Now living in Brooklyn, Ms. Gelso works at Trader Joe’s and does freelance artwork painting murals at retail stores. She said she “barely” makes her payments. “I have terrible credit but I think I’ve just accepted that,” she said.

Last Sunday, Ms. Gelso was in Washington Square Park along with a couple hundred others for a speech by the political activist Angela Davis. Ms. Gelso said that she had attended Occupy events “several times,” and when asked whether her student debt burden contributed to her participation in the movement, she answered in the affirmative. “It’s a huge reason that I’ve been coming,” she said. “Because of my own story I’ve seen how it’s hard for people to get secondary education and how vital it is in our society.”

It is accepted wisdom that Occupy Wall Street has too many diverse concerns to be tied to a single catalyst for the movement. The New York Times has suggested that the sole common thread among the occupiers is “anger.” But an alternative common thread might be the ubiquity of student debt. The early days of the occupation in Zuccotti Park have coincided with the news, as reported in USA Today, that outstanding student loans will reach a combined total of $1 trillion some time this year. According to the College Board, average tuition for four-year public colleges was up 8.3 percent over last year and average tuition for public four-year colleges rose almost 130 percent from 1988 to 2008. Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of the website FinAid.org, reports that the average debt load for a student graduating with a bachelor’s degree this year was $27,200, and $34,400 when the figure includes family loans. Moreover, the size of the country’s collective student debt outstripped the amount of its collective credit card debt in June of last year.

It took minimal questioning at a recent rally at Washington Square Park on a Sunday afternoon to find Ms. Gelso and several other college graduates or current students with thousands of dollars in student loans attached to their names. At Zuccotti Park the situation was similar. There was Alan Collinge, a longtime activist on the subject who has appeared on 60 Minutes and who has been camped out for three weeks with a sign advocating that bankruptcy protection be extended to holders of student loans. Other protesters did not name student loans as their primary concern, but they were willing to discuss their sense that to enter the workforce on a sure footing a tithe must be paid to the twin terrors of Citibank and Sallie Mae.

“There may be some overstatement in the term indentured servitude,” said Bruce Robbins, an English professor at Columbia University in a phone interview. “But for many jobs, you can’t get them unless you have a B.A. and for many people you can’t get a B.A. without going into debt.”

Students at Zuccotti Park affirmed this viewpoint. “I went to a graduate program at Hunter so I have loans from that,” said Daniel Scott, who said his balance for his master’s in integrated media arts is a relatively small $16,000. Mr. Scott works now building software for social movements and said that student debt was “kind of the backdrop” for many people on Occupy Wall Street. “I understood what I was getting into but it’s an unfortunate thing that people have to make that choice. It’s like if you’re going to be educated and you aren’t already financially set, then you’re going to be in debt. It’s just a bad choice that a lot of people have to make.”

On Nov. 12, a rally has been advertised as Generation Debt: A Day of Action and Awareness. The ubiquity of signs addressing the problem at rallies and marches and blogs like Occupy Student Debt, where indebted graduates share their insurmountable loan balances, are further indication that many of those involved in the movement see their primary relationship to Wall Street defined by the payments they must make each month.

Alexis Necole, a 23-year-old student at the New School who attended Sunday’s rally and is funding her education in part through student loans, said that for her just discussing the impact of loans on students’ lives is important. “It’s getting people to talk,” she said of Occupy Wall Street. “It’s a conscious exercise to get people to talk.”

As for responses, in the working groups and meetings at Occupy Wall Street hypothetical actions have ranged from advocating for debt forgiveness or proposing a mass boycott on payments to less drastic options like advocating for more consumer protection rights or simply more federal funding for public higher education. True to the spirit of the movement, no single demand has yet emerged.

“The general tenor is that student loans are one of the most lucrative and profitable operations of the finance industry, and education of all things should not be a vehicle for generating profit and debt,” said Andrew Ross, a professor of Social and Cultural Analysis at N.Y.U. who has participated in forums about higher education at Occupy Wall Street. “My own salary is debt-financed,” he added. “I don’t feel very good about that.” He emphasized that these discussions and opinions were to be seen as separate from the movement itself. Mr. Ross, along with other people interviewed, expressed particular concerns with the fees charged to students who cannot repay their debts, which are almost impossible to discharge in bankruptcy.

Comments

  1. Jane says:

    Art doesn’t pay.  Why did she take classes in art?  And expect to get a job?  

    1. Rachel Braun says:

      Where does it say that her major was painting, sculpture, printmaking, or any other fine arts major? I go to MassArt, so I got an e-mail (We get e-mails with the subject “MassArt in the News” every now and then) with a link to this article and it said “Angela Gelso, Industrial Design ’08, is quoted about her participation in Occupy Wall Street. The article examines the growing problem of student loans in higher education , among other issues being protested.”
      I think the article should of said what her degree is in, because once I saw that it didn’t say that, I was thinking “Oh my god, people are going to think she was a fine arts major and that she is stupid for thinking she could get a job.”

    2. mom says:

      Why should someone spend their life doing something they hate?

  2. Crock Tease says:

    I keep hearing a lot of rallying cries for forgiveness of student debt, and even though I’m behind the general philosophy of Occupy Wall street, this particular idea chills me to the bone.

    Why? Because I did not apply for student loans. I didn’t think I’d be able to handle the debt with my major and my expected pay. I ended up dropping out of school due mainly to lack of funds.

    If loans get forgiven, then that would mean I could have gone to school and had my debt magically disappear. If that happens, someone owes me an education –one I could have had if I had made a non-forward-thinking choice.

  3. Anonymous says:

    University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau hijack’s
    our kids’ futures. I love University
    of California (UC) having been a student & lecturer. But today I am
    concerned that at times I do not recognize the UC I love. Like so many I am
    deeply disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing,
    President Yudof, Chancellor Birgeneau from holding the line on rising costs
    & tuition increases. Paying more is not a better education.

    Californians are
    reeling from 19% unemployment (includes: those forced to work part time; those
    no longer searching), mortgage defaults, loss of unemployment benefits. And those
    who still have jobs are working longer for less. Faculty
    wages must reflect California’s
    ability to pay, not what others are paid.

    Current pay increases
    for generously paid University
    of California Faculty is
    arrogance. Instate tuition consumes 14% of Ca. Median Family Income!

    Paying more is not a
    better education. UC Berkeley(# 70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the
    national average rate of increases. Chancellor Birgeneau has molded Cal. into the most
    expensive public university.

    UC President Yudof, Cal.
    Chancellor Birgeneau($450,000 salary) dismissed many much needed cost-cutting
    options. They did not consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing
    class size, requiring faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between
    sabbaticals, cutting & freezing pay & benefits for chancellors &
    reforming pensions & the health benefits.

    They said such
    faculty reforms “would not be healthy for UC”. Exodus of faculty,
    administrators? Who can afford them and where would they go?

    We agree it is far
    from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university
    system & the state to stop cost increases. UC cannot expect to do business
    as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises & huge bonuses during a weak
    economy that has sapped state revenues & individual Californians’ income.

    There is no
    question the necessary realignments with economic reality are painful. Regent Chairwoman Lansing can bridge the public trust
    gap with reassurances that salaries & costs reflect California’s ability to pay. The sky above UC will not fall when Chancellor Birgeneau is ousted.

     

    Opinions? Email the UC Board
    of Regents  marsha.kelman@ucop.edu

     

     

     

  4. Anonymous says:

    Great article. Have learned from it. Thanks a lot! :)