<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; What to Do With a Derelict Queens Trestle: Advocates Square Off on High Line v. Rail Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2012/01/what-to-do-with-a-derelict-queens-trestle-advocates-square-off-on-high-line-v-rail-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>What to Do With a Derelict Queens Trestle: Advocates Square Off on High Line v. Rail Line</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/01/what-to-do-with-a-derelict-queens-trestle-advocates-square-off-on-high-line-v-rail-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:42:42 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/01/what-to-do-with-a-derelict-queens-trestle-advocates-square-off-on-high-line-v-rail-line/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Chaban</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=209421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politickerny.com/2011/06/07/living-the-high-line-elevated-park-brings-big-business-but-whats-next/">The High Line has been such a staggering success</a>, it has created <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/09/the-low-line-delancey-underground-plans-to-greenify-under-nyc/">impersonators</a> across the country and the world. And who can blame them, when the project has generated an estimated $2 billion in economic activity on a public investment of only $150 million.</p>
<p>But what if instead of building a park, a subway or light rail line ran along the Far West Side?</p>
<p>It is not a ludicrous idea. Light rail has proven a boon in downtown Portland and elsewhere, and with the extension of the 7 train to Hudson Yards, the line could well have hooked up with the High Line and made a whole swath of under-developed Manhattan real estate more accessible.</p>
<p>A glittery park has achieved just as much, but <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/transit-advocates-oppose-plan-turn-defunct-railroad-queensway-park-article-1.1000461?localLinksEnabled=false">this exact same debate is taking place in Queens</a>, <!--more-->according to the <em>Daily News</em>. An old LIRR trestle that closed in the 1960s <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-12-22/news/30548825_1_queensway-project-feasibility-study-green-space">has been dubbed QueensWay</a> by <a href="http://www.facebook.com/FriendsofTheQueensWay">a group of park advocates</a> hoping to turn the 3.5-mile stretch (three-times as long as the High Line) into a park.</p>
<p>The line stretches from Rego Park to the Rockaways, and it turns out those two communities are now at odds as those further from the city center lobby for the tracks reactivation instead of a park.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Certainly a quick trip to JFK Airport from the core of the city is something people have talked about from Year One,” said George Haikalis,  a civil engineer who heads the Institute for Rational Mobility, a  nonprofit umbrella group for transit advocates. “Nobody in the rest of  the world would be so dumb as to let a valuable asset like that sit  there.”</p>
<div>[<em>snip</em>]</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<blockquote><p>Assemblyman Philip Goldfeder, who represents the Rockaways, jumped into  the fray on Tuesday saying he opposed the creation of a park. “I believe southern Queens and Rockaway would be better served if this  forgotten track once again fulfilled its original purpose as a  railroad,” Goldfeder wrote in an open letter. “Those same communities  that are pushing this proposal are privileged with commutes of 30  minutes or less to midtown Manhattan.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Given the success of the High Line and <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/11/raiders-of-the-lost-arc-christie-cuomo-and-the-collapse-of-american-infrastructure/">the current challenges to funding mass transit</a>, it will be interesting to see what ultimately gets built here. Indeed, Friends of QueensWay have already come up with a number of designs for the new park.</p>
<p>Still, a story aired yesterday on WNYC about <a href="http://project.wnyc.org/news-maps/lost-subways/">lost subway lines</a>, including a number in outer Queens and Brooklyn, remind us how big an impact mass transit can have on urban development.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:mchaban@observer.com">mchaban [at] observer.com</a></strong> |<strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/MC_YC">@MC_NYC</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politickerny.com/2011/06/07/living-the-high-line-elevated-park-brings-big-business-but-whats-next/">The High Line has been such a staggering success</a>, it has created <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/09/the-low-line-delancey-underground-plans-to-greenify-under-nyc/">impersonators</a> across the country and the world. And who can blame them, when the project has generated an estimated $2 billion in economic activity on a public investment of only $150 million.</p>
<p>But what if instead of building a park, a subway or light rail line ran along the Far West Side?</p>
<p>It is not a ludicrous idea. Light rail has proven a boon in downtown Portland and elsewhere, and with the extension of the 7 train to Hudson Yards, the line could well have hooked up with the High Line and made a whole swath of under-developed Manhattan real estate more accessible.</p>
<p>A glittery park has achieved just as much, but <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/transit-advocates-oppose-plan-turn-defunct-railroad-queensway-park-article-1.1000461?localLinksEnabled=false">this exact same debate is taking place in Queens</a>, <!--more-->according to the <em>Daily News</em>. An old LIRR trestle that closed in the 1960s <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-12-22/news/30548825_1_queensway-project-feasibility-study-green-space">has been dubbed QueensWay</a> by <a href="http://www.facebook.com/FriendsofTheQueensWay">a group of park advocates</a> hoping to turn the 3.5-mile stretch (three-times as long as the High Line) into a park.</p>
<p>The line stretches from Rego Park to the Rockaways, and it turns out those two communities are now at odds as those further from the city center lobby for the tracks reactivation instead of a park.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Certainly a quick trip to JFK Airport from the core of the city is something people have talked about from Year One,” said George Haikalis,  a civil engineer who heads the Institute for Rational Mobility, a  nonprofit umbrella group for transit advocates. “Nobody in the rest of  the world would be so dumb as to let a valuable asset like that sit  there.”</p>
<div>[<em>snip</em>]</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<blockquote><p>Assemblyman Philip Goldfeder, who represents the Rockaways, jumped into  the fray on Tuesday saying he opposed the creation of a park. “I believe southern Queens and Rockaway would be better served if this  forgotten track once again fulfilled its original purpose as a  railroad,” Goldfeder wrote in an open letter. “Those same communities  that are pushing this proposal are privileged with commutes of 30  minutes or less to midtown Manhattan.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Given the success of the High Line and <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/11/raiders-of-the-lost-arc-christie-cuomo-and-the-collapse-of-american-infrastructure/">the current challenges to funding mass transit</a>, it will be interesting to see what ultimately gets built here. Indeed, Friends of QueensWay have already come up with a number of designs for the new park.</p>
<p>Still, a story aired yesterday on WNYC about <a href="http://project.wnyc.org/news-maps/lost-subways/">lost subway lines</a>, including a number in outer Queens and Brooklyn, remind us how big an impact mass transit can have on urban development.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:mchaban@observer.com">mchaban [at] observer.com</a></strong> |<strong> <a href="http://twitter.com/MC_YC">@MC_NYC</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/01/what-to-do-with-a-derelict-queens-trestle-advocates-square-off-on-high-line-v-rail-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
