HBO Renews Girls After Three Episodes, Veep After Two

But 'Game of Thrones' still dominates the playing field

veepgirls HBO Renews Girls After Three Episodes, Veep After Two

Funny ladies get second season (

With its crushing lineup right now, HBO would be fools not to re-up on two of its most hype-producing shows: Julia Louis-Dreyfus‘ cringe-y comedy Veep (Curb Your Enthusiasm for the White House, with Buster bonus), and Lena Dunham‘s cringe-y (for totally different reasons) Apatow production, Girls.

Luckily, fools they are not, and both shows have been renewed for second seasons before we’ve had time to learn most of the characters’ names.

According to a press release from HBO, both shows are signed for ten episodes next season. More interesting than their pick-up, however, is the data that accompanies the news:


Second-season commitment is for ten episodes.

Gross audience to date: 3.8 million viewers.


Second-season commitment is for ten episodes.

Gross audience to date: 3.7 million viewers.

Despite having a one episode lead on Veep, Girls only attracted 100,000 more viewers in total? Now, that’s interesting, especially after last week’s news that the premiere of Veep had beat Girls in the ratings by 600,000 viewers. (Veep is the lead-in to Girls on HBO’s Sunday night programming schedule.) We had chalked it up to first-episode curiosity, as both network and critics alike have been spending a lot more of their efforts on Ms. Dunham’s program. But it looks like the comedies are neck-and-neck for viewers, with Girls actually lagging a little bit.

Neither show, it should be noted, is drawing in the huge numbers like the epic saga that they follow: last week, Game of Thrones won the Sunday night rating wars over AMC’s Mad Men with a total of 3.65 million viewers.

Girls and Veep, good as they are, can’t seem to draw in that crucial nerd crowd that has allowed to GoT to dominate in its second season despite plodding plots, arcs that deviate from their book source, and the introduction of approximately 1,000 new characters to keep track of.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President