<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Thursday Styles Debates &#8216;Prostitots&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2012/04/thursday-styles-debates-prostitots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Thursday Styles Debates &#8216;Prostitots&#8217;</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/04/thursday-styles-debates-prostitots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:24:46 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/04/thursday-styles-debates-prostitots/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=235703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_235711" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 279px"><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/04/thursday-styles-debates-prostitots/a-toddler-shows-off-the-new-huggies-litt/" rel="attachment wp-att-235711"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/100018923-e1335450223674.jpg?w=269&h=300" alt="" title="A toddler shows off the new Huggies Litt" width="269" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-235711" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mothers, don&#039;t let your children (not) grow up to be this</p></div>These aren't the little sweet things you see shimmying to Lady Gaga on Toddlers and Tiaras (though that would actually make some sense). No, prostitots, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/fashion/the-rise-of-designer-childrens-lines.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&pagewanted=2&adxnnlx=1335449718-sOkGgwFSOPvDumm6zlIaWw#">according to <em>NYT</em> fashion editor <strong>Cathy Horyn</strong></a>, are the common parlance for children who wear the baby versions of designer clothes.</p>
<p>UES moms, gear up your iMacs to write an angry letter to the editor!</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
While interviewing Rachel Riley of the self-named British line of children's clothing, Ms. Horyn just slips in the new phrase nonchalantly: </p>
<blockquote><p>Ms. Riley said, “Children have big tummies and stand in funny ways.” Although she has made one or two concessions to popular tastes, like making her ballet flats in nail-varnish colors, she remains fixed in her view that children should be children and not little brand ambassadors or, in the current parlance, “prostitots.” She said: “I can’t bear advertising on children. And why would a child need to have anything remotely sexy? To me, it’s unethical.”</p></blockquote>
<p>By Ms. Riley (and Ms. Horyn's) own admission, anytime a child wears a brand-name outfit, they are engaging in prostitotution. Of course, this "trend" didn't pop up overnight:</p>
<blockquote><p>
It’s easy to feel a sense of nausea at such prices and at the idea that children, especially little girls, are being groomed to be future shoppers...But it’s also not a new concern...</p></blockquote>
<p>Out of all the ways a child can be made to turn tricks, putting them in a Burberry coat is obviously one of the classiest. Call it the Pre-Woman <em>Pretty Woman</em>-ing of your little moppets.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_235711" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 279px"><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/04/thursday-styles-debates-prostitots/a-toddler-shows-off-the-new-huggies-litt/" rel="attachment wp-att-235711"><img src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/100018923-e1335450223674.jpg?w=269&h=300" alt="" title="A toddler shows off the new Huggies Litt" width="269" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-235711" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mothers, don&#039;t let your children (not) grow up to be this</p></div>These aren't the little sweet things you see shimmying to Lady Gaga on Toddlers and Tiaras (though that would actually make some sense). No, prostitots, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/fashion/the-rise-of-designer-childrens-lines.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&pagewanted=2&adxnnlx=1335449718-sOkGgwFSOPvDumm6zlIaWw#">according to <em>NYT</em> fashion editor <strong>Cathy Horyn</strong></a>, are the common parlance for children who wear the baby versions of designer clothes.</p>
<p>UES moms, gear up your iMacs to write an angry letter to the editor!</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
While interviewing Rachel Riley of the self-named British line of children's clothing, Ms. Horyn just slips in the new phrase nonchalantly: </p>
<blockquote><p>Ms. Riley said, “Children have big tummies and stand in funny ways.” Although she has made one or two concessions to popular tastes, like making her ballet flats in nail-varnish colors, she remains fixed in her view that children should be children and not little brand ambassadors or, in the current parlance, “prostitots.” She said: “I can’t bear advertising on children. And why would a child need to have anything remotely sexy? To me, it’s unethical.”</p></blockquote>
<p>By Ms. Riley (and Ms. Horyn's) own admission, anytime a child wears a brand-name outfit, they are engaging in prostitotution. Of course, this "trend" didn't pop up overnight:</p>
<blockquote><p>
It’s easy to feel a sense of nausea at such prices and at the idea that children, especially little girls, are being groomed to be future shoppers...But it’s also not a new concern...</p></blockquote>
<p>Out of all the ways a child can be made to turn tricks, putting them in a Burberry coat is obviously one of the classiest. Call it the Pre-Woman <em>Pretty Woman</em>-ing of your little moppets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/04/thursday-styles-debates-prostitots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/100018923-e1335450223674.jpg?w=134" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/100018923-e1335450223674.jpg?w=134" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">A toddler shows off the new Huggies Litt</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/100018923-e1335450223674.jpg?w=269&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">A toddler shows off the new Huggies Litt</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
