Espaillat and Rangel Beef Big During Debate While Williams Scoffs

espaillat rangel ny1 Espaillat and Rangel Beef Big During Debate While Williams Scoffs“My campaign is not circulating petitions for any other office, I’m running to win on June 26th and that’s the end of it,” State Senator Adriano Espaillat said in response to the first question on Inside City Hall last night, inquiring whether he is trying to get onto the ballot to run for reelection while waging a congressional campaign. “I have not instructed anybody nor have I authorized anybody to circulate petitions for any office whatsoever.”

“I’m advising people not to sign any petitions with my name on it,” he added when the host, Errol Louis, pressed him on it, causing Mr. Louis to label his answer as “very clear.”

However, that was by far not the last time viewers of the debate heard of the charge, as Mr. Espaillat is seeking to unseat veteran Congressman Charlie Rangel, who continuously brought it up in subsequent questions.

“Your question to the Senator is very, very important,” Mr. Rangel told Mr. Louis after answering an unrelated second question in the debate. “For me to think that someone would have a petition out there for me unauthorized, I would be outraged and I would take it to the District Attorney’s office. Anything short of that — and I respect the integrity of the Senator — means that there are outlaws out there violating the law.”

Mr. Rangel even pulled out a copy of the petitions (he later pulled them out again) with Mr. Espaillat’s name on them to further prove his point.

“I’m glad that the congressman brought [up] the issue of ethics,” Mr. Espaillat responded, answering an unrelated third question of the debate. “Because in fact, back in 2010, the congressman gave the Tea Party Republicans an early Christmas gift when he was censured.”

“As a result of that, we lost 60 Democratic seats in Congress,” he rather exaggeratedly added.

And yes, the fourth and fifth questions also involved rehashing this same back-and-forth between the two.

Meanwhile, another one of Mr. Rangel’s challengers, former DNC political director Clyde Williams, sent out a statement reacting to this repeated exchange dismissing both candidates, declaring, “While my opponents waste time questioning each others’ ethics, I question their priorities.”

“The exchange about ethics between Mr. Rangel and Mr. Espaillat illustrates how they are wedded to the broken politics of Albany and Washington,” he posited. “We need new ideas to build a better future, not bitter and stale partisanship that’s a roadblock to progress for the people we seek to serve.”

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President