<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Žižek: Not Into Anal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2012/06/zizek-not-into-anal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Žižek: Not Into Anal</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/06/zizek-not-into-anal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:37:48 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/06/zizek-not-into-anal/</link>
			<dc:creator>Michael H. Miller</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=245981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_245982" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/06/zizek-not-into-anal/slavoj-zizek/" rel="attachment wp-att-245982"><img class="size-medium wp-image-245982 " title="Slavoj-Zizek" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/slavoj-zizek.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Courtesy Verso Books)</p></div></p>
<p>Who knew, right? The <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2012/jun/10/slavoj-zizek-humanity-ok-people-boring"><em>Guardian</em>'s profile</a> of the cultural theorist Slavoj Žižek, who has a new book out called <em>Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism</em>, is...not for the faint of heart.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Some of the profile is about his work, though the interpretations of the article's author are vapid to say the least:</p>
<blockquote><p>By the standards of cultural theory, Žižek sits at the more accessible end of the spectrum – but to give you an idea of where that still leaves him, here's a typical quote from a book called <a title="" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Zizek-Guide-Perplexed-Guides/dp/1441180877">Žižek: A Guide for the Perplexed</a>, intended to render him more comprehensible: "Žižek finds the place for Lacan in Hegel by seeing the Real as the correlate of the self-division and self-doubling within phenomena.</p></blockquote>
<p>But that hardly matters because for some horrifying reason, Mr. Žižek opens up about every sordid detail of his sex life, going off on a tangent that feels as random and beside-the-point as some of his more painful writing. Have a look at this exchange:</p>
<blockquote><p>I keep thinking I should try to intervene with a question, but he's off again. "I have strange limits. I am very – OK, another detail, fuck it. I was never able to do – even if a woman wanted it – annal sex." Annal sex? "Ah, anal sex. You know why not? Because I couldn't convince myself that she really likes it. I always had this suspicion, what if she only pretends, to make herself more attractive to me? It's the same thing for fellatio; I was never able to finish into the woman's mouth, because again, my idea is, this is not exactly the most tasteful fluid. What if she's only pretending?"</p></blockquote>
<p>Now you know probably the last thing on Earth that you ever wanted to find out.  In all fairness to Mr. Žižek, we always thought Hegel and Lacan were a little too fond of TMIs as well.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_245982" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/06/zizek-not-into-anal/slavoj-zizek/" rel="attachment wp-att-245982"><img class="size-medium wp-image-245982 " title="Slavoj-Zizek" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/slavoj-zizek.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Courtesy Verso Books)</p></div></p>
<p>Who knew, right? The <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2012/jun/10/slavoj-zizek-humanity-ok-people-boring"><em>Guardian</em>'s profile</a> of the cultural theorist Slavoj Žižek, who has a new book out called <em>Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism</em>, is...not for the faint of heart.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Some of the profile is about his work, though the interpretations of the article's author are vapid to say the least:</p>
<blockquote><p>By the standards of cultural theory, Žižek sits at the more accessible end of the spectrum – but to give you an idea of where that still leaves him, here's a typical quote from a book called <a title="" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Zizek-Guide-Perplexed-Guides/dp/1441180877">Žižek: A Guide for the Perplexed</a>, intended to render him more comprehensible: "Žižek finds the place for Lacan in Hegel by seeing the Real as the correlate of the self-division and self-doubling within phenomena.</p></blockquote>
<p>But that hardly matters because for some horrifying reason, Mr. Žižek opens up about every sordid detail of his sex life, going off on a tangent that feels as random and beside-the-point as some of his more painful writing. Have a look at this exchange:</p>
<blockquote><p>I keep thinking I should try to intervene with a question, but he's off again. "I have strange limits. I am very – OK, another detail, fuck it. I was never able to do – even if a woman wanted it – annal sex." Annal sex? "Ah, anal sex. You know why not? Because I couldn't convince myself that she really likes it. I always had this suspicion, what if she only pretends, to make herself more attractive to me? It's the same thing for fellatio; I was never able to finish into the woman's mouth, because again, my idea is, this is not exactly the most tasteful fluid. What if she's only pretending?"</p></blockquote>
<p>Now you know probably the last thing on Earth that you ever wanted to find out.  In all fairness to Mr. Žižek, we always thought Hegel and Lacan were a little too fond of TMIs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/06/zizek-not-into-anal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/aee941b3d74b0e43340c71f1a095f060?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mmillerobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/slavoj-zizek.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Slavoj-Zizek</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
