FRBNY Clearly Not Impressed With Other Regulators’ Sleuthing

Today was the day that suddenly everyone knew that Libor was rigged, always. Not municipalities which entered into credit default swaps, maybe—though in which case, who was giving them advice?—but nearly everyone else. And absolutely the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which revealed in response to a congressional inquiry that a Barclays employee told FRBNY that the lender was low-balling its Libor submissions to protect the firm’s share price. “I’m going to be frank and honest with you,” the employee said according to a telephone transcript released today:

You know, you know we went through a period where we were putting in where we really thought we would be able to borrow cash in the interbank market and it was, and the next thing we knew, there was um, an article in the Financial Times, charting our Libor contributions and comparing it with other banks and inferring that this meant that we have a problem raising cash in the interbank market. And, um, our share price went down. So it’s never supposed to be the prerogative of a, a money market dealer to affect their company share value. And so we just fit in with the rest of the crowd, if you like. So, we know that we’re not posting, um, an honest Libor.

That phone call took place in April 2008, and the message was shared with the other Federal Reserve banks, the U.S. Treasury and the Bank of England. But not, apparently, the Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Department of Justice, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the the British Financial Services Authority, the three regulators that settled Libor-rigging charges with Barclays last month to the tune of $450 million.

Take this settlement document, which culls from emails and telephone conversations to spell out Barclays executives disinclination to stick their heads “above the parapet” by submitting U.S. dollar Libor estimates above those of other submitters:

During the financial crisis period, Barclays directed its U.S. Dollar Libor submitters to lower their daily U.S. Dollar Libor submissions in order to protect Barclays’ reputation against what it believed were negative and unfair media and market perceptions that Barclays had a liquidity problem based in part on its high Libor submissions.

Which seemed like good work on the part of the three regulators when the settlement was reached. But which seems like a lot of effort to have uncover something the Fed had known for years.

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President