WSJ Columnist Asks if Women Saved By Boyfriends in Aurora Theater Shooting Were Worth It

Retweeting critics isn't a retraction.

tarantoscreencap WSJ Columnist Asks if Women Saved By Boyfriends in Aurora Theater Shooting Were Worth It

James Taranto on Fox Business (screengrab)

Wall Street Journal columnist James Taranto’s bad Tuesday night on Twitter is a tale of two tweets. First,  Mr. Taranto’s offending post, which started a firestorm. Referring to the three women whose boyfriends saved them from the bullets of a mass murderer in an Aurora, Colorado movie theater on July 20, Mr. Taranto wrote:

Yes, the columnist who helms WSJ‘s “Best of the Web Today” waded right in to the fray. The question many responding to his “challenging” tweet asked was why? Why even say such a thing?

Hours earlier, Mr. Taranto had issued this complaint:

Could it be Mr. Taranto, feeling the sting of Twitter’s withheld merit badge, decided the best way to assert his “merit” was to aim his “challenging” statement at three women–“girls” to Mr. Taranto–who survived what were surely the worst moments of their lives? Three women who lost loved ones in the process?

We don’t know the mind of James Taranto. We don’t know if he thinks it is truly his place to question the value of the lives of victims of a terrifying mass murder; if he believes he merits that sort of power.

Maybe he was simply trying to be provocative, for his readers’ sakes.

To be fair, Mr. Taranto did retweet many who who took him to task for his musing. This angry, outraged response from a tweeter named Matthew Almont is an excellent example of the sort of bile Mr. Taranto was comfortable with relaying to his followers:

A blistering reply.

A wider variety of opinion, most of it likely not as easy on Mr. Taranto’s ego, can be found here.