Obama Pollster Says (With Data) Ryan Pick a Dud

 Obama Pollster Says (With Data) Ryan Pick a DudThe Obama campaign is out this morning with a memo from lead pollster Joel Benenson that finds–unsurprisingly, perhaps, considering the source–that the choice of Paul Ryan as Mitt Romney’s running mate has been a dud.

The memo, titled “The Announcement without a Bounce: Romney’s Choice of Ryan Falls Flat” lays out the data.

Among the salient findings are that typically a veep choice gives a candidate a 4.7 percent bounce, but that according to Gallup, the choice of Mr. Ryan gained Mr. Romney only 1 percentage point. Mr. Benenson, who is based in New York, also said that veep choices count little among how voters actually vote, but that they do say something about a candidate’s decision-making ability. 

“On this score, Romney seems to have failed a key test,” Mr. Benenson writes. “Only 39% view Romney’s choice as ‘excellent’ or ‘good,’ while 42% say Ryan was an ‘only fair’ or ‘poor’ choice. These are the lowest marks since Gallup began asking the question, 5 points lower than George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle. Meanwhile, only 48% believe Ryan is qualified to be president, also near the bottom in the past quarter century.  Only Quayle (32%) and Sarah Palin (39%) were seen as less qualified.”

Full memo below:

TO:               Interested Parties

 

FROM:         Joel Benenson

 

RE:              The Announcement without a Bounce: Romney’s Choice of Ryan Falls Flat

 

DATE:          August 16, 2012

Ø  Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as the Republican vice presidential nominee is viewed less favorably and has had less positive impact than nearly any nomination in a quarter century.

ü  Initial metrics place Romney’s choice on a par with the selections of Sarah Palin and Dan Quayle.

Ø  The announcement of a nominee’s running-mate has typically led to a measurable bump for a ticket.

ü  Since 1996, Republicans have received an average 4.7 point gain in the polls, according to Gallup.

Ø  In contrast, initial polls show that Ryan has had virtually no impact on Romney’s position in the polls, even in polls that have been shown to have a Republican-leaning “house effect.”

ü  In Gallup’s daily tracking poll, Romney has picked up only 1 point of support since the pick.

ü  In Rasmussen’s daily tracker, Romney has lost a point from his pre-announcement standing, going from a 46-44 lead over the President to a 45-44 lead today.

ü  According to the Economist’s YouGov poll, the President has extended his lead from 46-45 in early August to 47-44 in the three days after the choice of Ryan.

Ø  Analysts often over-estimate the influence of a running-mate on a presidential campaign. Studies regularly show that voters base their choice on their opinions of those at the top of the tickets.

Ø  Where the choice of a running mate matters, though, is in what it says about the decision-making ability and priorities of the presidential nominee.

Ø  On this score, Romney seems to have failed a key test.

Ø  Only 39% view Romney’s choice as “excellent” or “good,” while 42% say Ryan was an “only fair” or “poor” choice.

ü  These are the lowest marks since Gallup began asking the question, 5 points lower than George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle.

Ø  Meanwhile, only 48% believe Ryan is qualified to be president, also near the bottom in the past quarter century.

ü  Only Quayle (32%) and Sarah Palin (39%) were seen as less qualified.

Ø  Defenders of the Ryan selection have pointed to Ryan’s low level of familiarity as the reason for these poor ratings and the negligible effect on the race dynamic.

Ø  But historical data casts into doubt this analysis.

Ø  In its first post-pick poll, Gallup finds 39% saying they had never heard of Ryan.

ü  By comparison, Sarah Palin was unknown to 51%, and yet her choice was still viewed more favorably initially.

ü  In 1996, Jack Kemp was unknown to 55% of voters. Nonetheless, his choice led to a 9-point bump in Bob Dole’s position in the horserace against President Bill Clinton.

Ø  A more likely explanation is that for his running-mate, Romney has chosen a leader from the most extreme wing of the the least popular institution in America, Congressional Republicans.

ü  In the most recent Gallup poll, only 10% approved of the job Congress was doing, the lowest rating Gallup has ever measured for Congress.

ü  A recent PPP poll found that 60% agreed that “this is the worst Congress ever.”

Ø  In this way, the coverage of Ryan emphasizing his position as the “intellectual leader” of the Republican Congress and the author of its agenda only serves to weaken the Romney-Ryan ticket.

ü  Voters’ reaction to Romney’s choice of Ryan suggests a high level of concern that with his selection of running-mate, Romney has explicitly aligned himself with the leadership, the agenda and the extreme ideology of the least popular Congress in history.

Article continues below
More from Culture
Shades of "Greenery."
Pantone’s Color of the Year is Green—a Vastly Underappreciated Color