<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; French Being Very French, British Being Very British About Kate Middleton Topless Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2012/09/french-being-very-french-british-being-very-british-about-kate-middleton-topless-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>French Being Very French, British Being Very British About Kate Middleton Topless Photos</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/09/french-being-very-french-british-being-very-british-about-kate-middleton-topless-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:48:22 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/09/french-being-very-french-british-being-very-british-about-kate-middleton-topless-photos/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=263321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_263348" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 192px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/09/french-being-very-french-british-being-very-british-about-kate-middleton-topless-photos/kate/" rel="attachment wp-att-263348"><img class="size-full wp-image-263348" title="kate" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/kate.jpg" alt="" width="182" height="298" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge. (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Call it a culture gap: The French just don't see what's wrong with bare breasts.</p>
<p>As you undoubtedly know by now, Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton was shot sunbathing topless by French paparazzi for the French magazine <em>Closer</em>. Now the royal family is making motion to file a proper lawsuit against the publication, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2012/09/14/british-royal-family-lawsuit-kate-middleton-naked-photos-pics-closer-magazine/">according to a royal rep</a>. To which the magazine has responded, "What is ze big deal?"<br />
<!--more--><br />
"These photos are not in the least shocking," <em>Closer</em> editor Laurence Pieau told reporters from <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/entertainment-us-france-royals-kate-idINBRE88D0D820120914">AFP</a>. "They show a young woman sunbathing topless, like the millions of women you see on beaches."</p>
<p>Maybe this editor needs to be reminded that there are no topless beaches in London, due to their chilly weather and even chillier reception of public nudity. Ms. Pieau continued:</p>
<blockquote><p>"One shouldn't dramatize these pictures. The reaction has been a little disproportionate. It is a young couple that has just been married. They are in love. They are beautiful. She is the princess of the 21st century.</p>
<p>These are pictures that are full of joy. They are not degrading. Similarities have been drawn with the pictures of Harry. They are not similar. These are not degrading."</p></blockquote>
<p>So far, the the royal family has taken quite a different stance, calling the photos "<a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/entertainment-us-france-royals-kate-idINBRE88D0D820120914">grotesque</a>." Which actually does seem like a poor word choice, in this context.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_263348" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 192px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/09/french-being-very-french-british-being-very-british-about-kate-middleton-topless-photos/kate/" rel="attachment wp-att-263348"><img class="size-full wp-image-263348" title="kate" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/kate.jpg" alt="" width="182" height="298" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge. (Getty Images)</p></div></p>
<p>Call it a culture gap: The French just don't see what's wrong with bare breasts.</p>
<p>As you undoubtedly know by now, Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton was shot sunbathing topless by French paparazzi for the French magazine <em>Closer</em>. Now the royal family is making motion to file a proper lawsuit against the publication, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2012/09/14/british-royal-family-lawsuit-kate-middleton-naked-photos-pics-closer-magazine/">according to a royal rep</a>. To which the magazine has responded, "What is ze big deal?"<br />
<!--more--><br />
"These photos are not in the least shocking," <em>Closer</em> editor Laurence Pieau told reporters from <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/entertainment-us-france-royals-kate-idINBRE88D0D820120914">AFP</a>. "They show a young woman sunbathing topless, like the millions of women you see on beaches."</p>
<p>Maybe this editor needs to be reminded that there are no topless beaches in London, due to their chilly weather and even chillier reception of public nudity. Ms. Pieau continued:</p>
<blockquote><p>"One shouldn't dramatize these pictures. The reaction has been a little disproportionate. It is a young couple that has just been married. They are in love. They are beautiful. She is the princess of the 21st century.</p>
<p>These are pictures that are full of joy. They are not degrading. Similarities have been drawn with the pictures of Harry. They are not similar. These are not degrading."</p></blockquote>
<p>So far, the the royal family has taken quite a different stance, calling the photos "<a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/entertainment-us-france-royals-kate-idINBRE88D0D820120914">grotesque</a>." Which actually does seem like a poor word choice, in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/09/french-being-very-french-british-being-very-british-about-kate-middleton-topless-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/151977068.jpg?w=91" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/151977068.jpg?w=91" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">MALAYSIA-BRITAIN-ROYALS</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/66171f102efbbabd4a08d4202ed36b91?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dgrantobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/kate.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kate</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
