Gov. Cuomo Signs Bill Protecting Artists’ Rights

cuomo Gov. Cuomo Signs Bill Protecting Artists Rights

Gov. Cuomo. (Courtesy Patrick McMullan)

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has signed a bill that makes it a misdemeanor for an art dealer to use funds owed to an artist from the sale of an artwork to pay for gallery operating expenses and creditors. The Senate passed the bill in June, and Gov. Cuomo signed it earlier this month. Its was inspired by instances of dealers dipping into artists’ funds when experiencing financial hardship.

The bill was drafted by a subcommittee of the New York City Bar Association chaired by Dean Nicyper, and supported by the Art Law Committee of the City Bar. It used Salander O’Reilly Galleries as an example. Salander filed for bankruptcy in 2007, after more than 20 years in business. The gallery, to quote the Art Law Committee’s report, “commingled the sales proceeds that belonged to the artists, artists’ heirs and artists’ estates with the gallery’s own funds.” When Salander started having money troubles in 2005, the gallery had problems paying its artists and, by 2007, stopped paying them altogether. Millions of dollars owed to artists had disappeared, having instead gone toward keeping the gallery afloat. The gallery still remained in possession of hundreds of works consigned by their artists and artists’ estates, which were claimed by Salander’s creditors and tied up in messy litigation. The new legislation “gives teeth” (in the language of the report) to the rule that artists must be paid for the sale of their work, despite any financial difficulties their dealer may be having, and states that creditors have no claim to such funds or to consigned works.

The new law also requires that dealers pay the legal fees of artists or estates that successfully sue for undispersed funds, in addition to money that was owed. Under the new bill, “heirs, personal representatives, testamentary beneficiaries and trustees of beneficiaries of lifetime trusts” are given the same rights an artist has.

“This law is good for everyone,” said John Cahill, the chair of the Art Law Committee. “The only people it isn’t good for are the people who are dishonest. It’s something that helps New York continue to be the center of the art world.”

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President