<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; U.S. Appeals Court Revives Securities Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2012/09/u-s-appeals-court-revives-securities-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>U.S. Appeals Court Revives Securities Cases</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/09/u-s-appeals-court-revives-securities-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:05:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/09/u-s-appeals-court-revives-securities-cases/</link>
			<dc:creator>Patrick Clark</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=261329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court revived a pair of securities cases in decisions handed down today, reinstating a lawsuit charging Goldman Sachs with misleading mortgage investors, as well as a 10-year-old insider trading case brought against a hedge fund manager. <!--more-->In the former case, the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that NECA-IBEW Health &amp; Welfare Fund, which serves electrical workers, could lead a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors in 17 mortgage-backed securities underwritten by Goldman. According to Bloomberg, NECA only invested in two of the offerings, and in 2010, a federal judge ruled that fund <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-06/goldman-sachs-securities-class-action-revived-by-appeals-court.html">lacked standing</a> to represent investors in the other securities. Reuters reports that today's ruling reinstates claims <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/06/us-goldman-mortgages-ruling-idUSBRE8850TC20120906">relating to seven</a> of the securities.</p>
<p>In the latter decision, the Second Circuit breathed new life into insider trading charges first brought in 2001, in which the SEC alleged that hedge fund Wynnefield Capital earned $1.3 million trading on privileged information about a company called SunSource. According to <em>The Times, </em>which <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/04/the-curious-case-of-nelson-obus/">wrote at length</a> about the case last year, the government alleged that Wynnefield president Nelson Obus received a tip that SunSource was in play. Mr. Obus increased his holdings in SunSource, and when the company was sold, the share price doubled.</p>
<p>A trial court judge ruled that Wynnefield's source was not a corporate insider, thus hadn't breached his duty to protect SunSource's information. The Second Circuit <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/appeals-court-revives-insider-trading-case-against-obus/">disagreed, ruling</a> that "the SEC had established genuine questions."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court revived a pair of securities cases in decisions handed down today, reinstating a lawsuit charging Goldman Sachs with misleading mortgage investors, as well as a 10-year-old insider trading case brought against a hedge fund manager. <!--more-->In the former case, the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that NECA-IBEW Health &amp; Welfare Fund, which serves electrical workers, could lead a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors in 17 mortgage-backed securities underwritten by Goldman. According to Bloomberg, NECA only invested in two of the offerings, and in 2010, a federal judge ruled that fund <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-06/goldman-sachs-securities-class-action-revived-by-appeals-court.html">lacked standing</a> to represent investors in the other securities. Reuters reports that today's ruling reinstates claims <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/06/us-goldman-mortgages-ruling-idUSBRE8850TC20120906">relating to seven</a> of the securities.</p>
<p>In the latter decision, the Second Circuit breathed new life into insider trading charges first brought in 2001, in which the SEC alleged that hedge fund Wynnefield Capital earned $1.3 million trading on privileged information about a company called SunSource. According to <em>The Times, </em>which <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/04/the-curious-case-of-nelson-obus/">wrote at length</a> about the case last year, the government alleged that Wynnefield president Nelson Obus received a tip that SunSource was in play. Mr. Obus increased his holdings in SunSource, and when the company was sold, the share price doubled.</p>
<p>A trial court judge ruled that Wynnefield's source was not a corporate insider, thus hadn't breached his duty to protect SunSource's information. The Second Circuit <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/appeals-court-revives-insider-trading-case-against-obus/">disagreed, ruling</a> that "the SEC had established genuine questions."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/09/u-s-appeals-court-revives-securities-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d70d905cefb5ef1d46759583ff55c9f?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pclarkobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>