Mayor Bloomberg Would Be ‘Shocked’ by a Rudy Giuliani Comeback Campaign

rudy giuliani smiling getty Mayor Bloomberg Would Be Shocked by a Rudy Giuliani Comeback Campaign

(Photo: Getty)

This morning, the New York Post floated the idea of former Mayor Rudy Giuliani making yet another bid for Gracie Mansion, which few politicos in New York City took seriously. Well, you can count current Mayor Michael Bloomberg among the skeptics.

“Knowing Rudy, I think at this point in his life, I’d be shocked if he wanted to come back, but you can ask him,” Mr. Bloomberg told us during a press conference announcing a new media center in Dumbo, Brooklyn.

Mr. Bloomberg also said, while he thinks it would be too late for Mr. Giuliani to run in next year’s race, he’d welcome Mr. Giuliani into the 2017 mayoral campaign.

“He was a mayor who made a very good positive contribution to this city and I’ve always said, the more candidates the better,” he continued. “So, if four years from now he wants to run, fine, I think it’s probably too late for him to run this thing.”

The current mayor also made sure to heap a little praise on his predecessor.

“You’ll never get me to say anything bad about Rudy Giuliani. He did things his way and he left it better, and we built on that,” he said. “He’s been very supportive of me and I will be supportive of whoever gets elected to succeed me. That’s my obligation, that’s what’s best for this city, I plan to be here for the rest of my life and I think my kids will be as well.”

Mayor Bloomberg is far from the only one who has doubts about the Post’s rumors of a Rudy redux. A well-placed official with the New York State Republican Party, which has been involved with the search for a GOP mayoral candidate, told Politicker they were very dubious about the idea of a Giuliani comeback.

“We haven’t heard anything about Mayor Giuliani running now or in the future,” they said.

For his part, Mr. Giuliani is keeping quiet. We have tried to reach him multiple times to discuss the rumors, but, as of this writing, he has not responded.

Additional reporting by Hunter Walker. 

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President