You Can’t Go Home Again: Homeland Star Claire Danes Ditches Soho Loft

claire danes 090612 sp You Cant Go Home Again: <em>Homeland</em> Star Claire Danes Ditches Soho Loft

How much frozen yogurt can you buy with $5.85 million?

There comes a time in every former starlet’s life when she realizes that she has outgrown her Soho loft and needs to move on. For Claire Danes, this realization apparently hit when she found out she was pregnant with her first child.

Ms. Danes, who owns a 3,851-square-foot condo at 42 Wooster Street, which she purchased as “A. Kulik” back in 1998, has sold the space for $5.85 million, reports The New York Post.

danes You Cant Go Home Again: <em>Homeland</em> Star Claire Danes Ditches Soho Loft

The single-girl loft has been sold.

That’s a little bit less than the $5.99 million that she was asking when she listed the three-bedroom, 3-bath space with Town Residential brokers Lee Clifford Schweninger and Elaine Schweninger in June. But it’s a pretty nice haul considering she bought if for $627,000. Unlike Evening, the condo was a massive hit.

At least Ms. Danes met husband during the filming of that dull flick. And she moved on to star in one of television’s most riveting dramas. It was time for a scene change and something more family friendly for the actress described by the Post as “a Yale drop-out who is currently pregnant.” Ouch.

The apartment does have some wacky, late-90s, it-girl touches that Ms. Danes might be happy to leave behind, including a rotating breakfast nook. But nothing a renovation to the 16-windowed loft couldn’t fix.

Where to next for Ms. Danes and Mr. Dancy? Park Slope? Cobble Hill?

Article continues below
More from Business & Tech
People take part in a protest outside the New York Times on February 26, 2017 in New York. The White House denied access Frebuary 24. 2017 to an off-camera briefing to several major US media outlets, including CNN and The New York Times. Smaller outlets that have provided favorable coverage however were allowed to attend the briefing by spokesman Sean Spicer. The WHCA said it was "protesting strongly" against the decision to selectively deny media access. The New York Times said the decision was "an unmistakable insult to democratic ideals," CNN called it "an unacceptable development," and The Los Angeles Times warned the incident had "ratcheted up the White House's war on the free press" to a new level. / AFP / KENA BETANCUR (Photo credit should read KENA BETANCUR/AFP/Getty Images)
NYT Now Earns More From Readers Than Advertisers—Thanks, Trump