<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; British Body Cream Will Not Give You That &#8216;Mila Kunis Esquire Look&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/2013/01/british-body-cream-will-not-give-you-that-mila-kunis-esquire-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>British Body Cream Will Not Give You That &#8216;Mila Kunis Esquire Look&#8217;</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2013/01/british-body-cream-will-not-give-you-that-mila-kunis-esquire-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:32:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2013/01/british-body-cream-will-not-give-you-that-mila-kunis-esquire-look/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=284727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2013/01/british-body-cream-will-not-give-you-that-mila-kunis-esquire-look/banned-ad-for-body-cream-featuring-mila-kunis/" rel="attachment wp-att-284737"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-284737" alt="Banned ad for body cream featuring Mila Kunis" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/banned-ad-for-body-cream-008.jpeg?w=300" width="300" height="180" /></a>A U.K. ad campaign featuring Mila Kunis has been banned for misleading consumers into thinking that a skin cream could make them look like the actress named "the sexiest woman alive" by <em>Esquire </em>in 2012, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jan/16/mila-kunis-ad-campaign-banned">The Guardian reports</a>. The campaign claimed that by rubbing British skin company Rodial's £75 pound lotion onto the skin twice a day for four weeks, you could get a "body to die for," just like Ms. Kunis. <!--more--></p>
<p>The skin cream is not, in fact, proven to make anybody die for your body, although we must say, that does sound like a subjective criterion. Nor will the cream give you "Mila Kunis' <em>Esquire</em> look," as the advertisement goes on to purport. Only a combination of genetics, airbrushing, makeup and dieting will do that.</p>
<p>The Advertising Standards Authority, the U.K.’s industry watchdog group, objected to the ad after it received a complaint by somebody who concluded that it is impossible to get Ms. Kunis's figure from a bottle. The company claimed that the "information" it provided was based on two ingredients in what would surely be a miracle product.</p>
<p>But the ASA did not buy that claim. And wanted to stop a susceptible British public from buying the cream.</p>
<p>"Because robust evidence was not presented to demonstrate the implied efficacy claims for the product or that Mila Kunis had achieved the look featured in the photo as a result of using the product, we concluded that the ad was misleading," the ASA told<em> The Guardian</em>.</p>
<p>The ad has been banned as a result. Glad to know somebody is out there fighting the good fight to make sure that nobody wastes money hoping to get Ms. Kunis's <em>Esquire </em>look.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2013/01/british-body-cream-will-not-give-you-that-mila-kunis-esquire-look/banned-ad-for-body-cream-featuring-mila-kunis/" rel="attachment wp-att-284737"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-284737" alt="Banned ad for body cream featuring Mila Kunis" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/banned-ad-for-body-cream-008.jpeg?w=300" width="300" height="180" /></a>A U.K. ad campaign featuring Mila Kunis has been banned for misleading consumers into thinking that a skin cream could make them look like the actress named "the sexiest woman alive" by <em>Esquire </em>in 2012, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jan/16/mila-kunis-ad-campaign-banned">The Guardian reports</a>. The campaign claimed that by rubbing British skin company Rodial's £75 pound lotion onto the skin twice a day for four weeks, you could get a "body to die for," just like Ms. Kunis. <!--more--></p>
<p>The skin cream is not, in fact, proven to make anybody die for your body, although we must say, that does sound like a subjective criterion. Nor will the cream give you "Mila Kunis' <em>Esquire</em> look," as the advertisement goes on to purport. Only a combination of genetics, airbrushing, makeup and dieting will do that.</p>
<p>The Advertising Standards Authority, the U.K.’s industry watchdog group, objected to the ad after it received a complaint by somebody who concluded that it is impossible to get Ms. Kunis's figure from a bottle. The company claimed that the "information" it provided was based on two ingredients in what would surely be a miracle product.</p>
<p>But the ASA did not buy that claim. And wanted to stop a susceptible British public from buying the cream.</p>
<p>"Because robust evidence was not presented to demonstrate the implied efficacy claims for the product or that Mila Kunis had achieved the look featured in the photo as a result of using the product, we concluded that the ad was misleading," the ASA told<em> The Guardian</em>.</p>
<p>The ad has been banned as a result. Glad to know somebody is out there fighting the good fight to make sure that nobody wastes money hoping to get Ms. Kunis's <em>Esquire </em>look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2013/01/british-body-cream-will-not-give-you-that-mila-kunis-esquire-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/banned-ad-for-body-cream-008.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Banned ad for body cream featuring Mila Kunis</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
