Bob Turner Not Conceding Queens GOP Leadership Fight

Former Congressman Bob Turner. (Photo: Getty)

Former Congressman Bob Turner. (Photo: Getty)

Though the Queens Republican Party declared incumbent chairman Phil Ragusa the victor in a tense leadership vote last week, insurgent candidate Bob Turner is not backing down yet.

The former congressman–like past challengers of Mr. Ragusa–is claiming he won the election and is hoping to invalidate his opponent’s victory in court.

“There were elections in the Soviet Union conducted more fairly than this one,” said Councilman Eric Ulrich, Mr. Turner’s most prominent booster. “From what I understand, our attorneys will be drafting paperwork to invalidate Phil Ragusa’s certificate.”

“We have nothing to defend. They haven’t brought a suit against us. We want the court to uphold Bob Turner’s election as the chair,” Mr. Ulrich added, indicating that they would be filing the suit in court tomorrow.

But according to a Republican source familiar with the situation, Mr. Turner faces an uphill battle. While Mr. Ulrich said the party counted 100 percent of votes cast for Mr. Ragusa as valid and dismissed half of those cast for Mr. Turner, courts rarely overturn the results of elections conducted by county organizations.

Robert Hornak, the executive director of the Queens GOP and a staunch opponent of Mr. Ulrich’s southern faction of the party, was confident Mr. Ragusa would remain the chairman.

“This is more of the same from this ethically challenged group,” Mr. Hornak charged. “They declared Bart Haggerty the Chairman in 2009 and Tom Ognibene the Chairman in 2011. This claim has the same merit as those.”

Two years ago, Mr. Ulrich’s insurgent faction of the party tried to install former Councilman Tom Ognibene as chair and then challenged his election loss in court. That challenge failed.

“What happens is, legally they can contest the election,” explained the Republican source, who predicted Mr. Turner would struggle to ultimately win control of the party. “If you go by precedent and history, every time they’ve lost when challenging the results in court. Judges don’t want to get involved in political fights unless there’s some glaring illegal activity.”

Article continues below
More from Politics
STAR OF DAVID OR 'PLAIN STAR'?   If you thought "CP Time" was impolitic, on July 2 Donald Trump posted a picture on Twitter of a Star of David on top of a pile of cash next to Hillary Clinton's face. You'd think after the aforementioned crime stats incident (or after engaging a user called "@WhiteGenocideTM," or blasting out a quote from Benito Mussolini, or...) Trump would have learned to wait a full 15 seconds before hitting the "Tweet" button. But not only was the gaffe itself bad, the attempts at damage control made the BP oil spill response look a virtuoso performance.  About two hours after the image went up on Trump's account, somebody took it down and replaced it with a similar picture that swapped the hexagram with a circle (bearing the same legend "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!"!). Believe it or not, it actually got worse from there. As reports arose that the first image had originated on a white supremacist message board, Trump insisted that the shape was a "sheriff's star," or "plain star," not a Star of David. And he continued to sulk about the coverage online and in public for days afterward, even when the media was clearly ready to move on. This refusal to just let some bad press go would haunt him later on.
Donald Trump More Or Less Says He’ll Keep On Tweeting as President