Feed

DIMON IN THE ROUGH

DIMON IN THE ROUGH

JPMorgan Chase CEO James Dimon Speaks At Annual Simon New York Conference

What You Need to Know From JPMorgan’s Conference Call on the London Whale

It’s been two months now since the JPMorgan trader known as the London Whale was harpooned on the market for credit derivatives, and it has not been an easy two months. For even if the bank recorded $5 billion in net income for the second-quarter, as it announced before a conference call with analysts today, and even if the bank’s famous fortress balance sheet was undented, you couldn’t say the same thing for the bank’s reputation. Mr. Dimon was called to Washington not once but twice, and if he acquitted himself well, he’d certainly lost his luster as America’s least-hated banker. Worse, while the bank conducted an internal review of the disastrous trade, the rest of the world speculated; and with every tale of the oversight failures that precipitated the losses, it was harder to credit the bank’s reputation as the gold standard in risk management.

Well, today’s earnings announcement gave the firm a chance to set the record straight, or at any rate, to put an end to the speculation of how bad the losses were, and just what caused them. And so The Observer was glued to computer screen for the firm’s two-hour webcast. What you need to know is here: Read More

DIMON IN THE ROUGH

Maurice Greenberg

And Then Another Wall Street Titan Defended Jamie Dimon Over Trading Losses

This has become a theme: Former AIG chief executive officer Maurice “Hank” Greenberg took issue with Congress’s supposedly-rough treatment of Jamie Dimon after JPMorgan disclosed billions of dollars in losses on derivatives bets associated with the trader nicknamed the London Whale.

“It was really outrageous to have the CEO come down and testify before Read More

DIMON IN THE ROUGH

(Eric Piermont/AFP/Getty Images)

Mr. Dimon Goes to Washington…Again

JPMorgan chief executive officer Jamie Dimon testified in Washington again today, and while the denizens of the House Financial Services Committee were, as promised, a little wackier than their counterparts on the Senate Banking Committee, the results were mostly the same.

Mr. Dimon took responsibility for the $2.3 billion-and-counting loss suffered by the firm’s chief Read More

DIMON IN THE ROUGH

(Eric Piermont/AFP/Getty Images)

Jamie Dimon Has Nothing to Say to the House that He Couldn’t Tell the Senate

Or at least not much: An industrious chap at The New York Times held Jamie Dimon’s prepared remarks to the Senate Banking Committee last week next to testimony posted on the website of the House Financial Services Committee, before which Mr. Dimon will appear tomorrow, and found that the two documents were virtually the same.

Which is a bit of a drag. Mr. Dimon’s Senate testimony last week was so uneventful that the punditry took to remarking on the JPMorgan chief executive officer’s couture—and sure, we can play that game: We’d like to suggest that Mr. Dimon’s presidential cufflinks were a ploy to distract observers from the substance of his testimony, but given the snooze-fest in the Senate last week, it was more likely a test to see who was staying awake. Read More

DIMON IN THE ROUGH

JPMorgan Chase CEO James Dimon Speaks At Annual Simon New York Conference

Did the Timing of Disclosure Save Jamie Dimon’s Job as JPMorgan Board Chairman?

We had an interesting conversation yesterday about the timing of JPMorgan’s disclosure of $2.3 billion trading losses, after the tallies were counted in a shareholder proposal to replace Mr. Dimon as chairman of the bank’s board of directors. Mr. Dimon is currently chairman and chief executive officer, and while the attempt to strip him of the board role failed, the proposal received 41 percent of the vote, an improved result for investors like AFSCME’s Lisa Lindsley*, who see a conflict of interest when the two roles are shared.

“That was a strong vote,” said our friend, who thinks about these things. “What would have happened if Dimon had disclosed the losses two days earlier? Would there have been more time to build support for the proposal?” Read More