Alex Karpovsky at Red Flag screening. (Getty Images)

And his fans aren’t always those you might expect.

Just last week, the Transom was walking through Union Square with Mr. Karpovsky, en route to lunch, when an older man stopped the actor on the street. He just really wanted to say how much he liked the show. Mr. Karpovsky estimates that this happens "a couple times" a day.

And in case we didn’t believe him, cut to Lincoln Center last Friday night, where Mr. Karpovsky was playing host to a double screening of his two most recent directorial efforts and old Russian men made up a sizable chunk of the Karpovosky fan club.

Then again, it was all the way up at Lincoln Center, and the movies--which were picked up by Tribeca Films for distribution--had an earlier screening on Wednesday downtown. That one ended up making it into Page Six, if only to note that his two much more private male co-stars, Adam Driver and Christopher Abbott, were in attendance.

At Lincoln Center, Mr. Karpovsky held court over approximately 50 people, talking about the films, Red Flag and Rubberneck, both of which were made three years ago. In the former, Mr. Karpovsky plays himself as a kind of fatalistic Larry David/Woody Allen sad-sack shmuck on a cross-country roadtrip to promote his (real) faux-documentary, Woodpecker. (With us so far?) In the latter, a psychosexual thriller, he plays a creepy scientist who indulges an unhealthy obsession with a coworker after a one-night stand.

Surprised by Mr. Karpovsky’s output? Don’t be. In the time of B.G. ("Before Girls”), Mr. Karpovsky was a reasonably prolific filmmaker, with other movies like Trust Us, This Is All Made Up, The Whole Story and the aforementioned Woodpecker. He's acted in dozens more.

And if this is Mr. Karpovsky's big moment--his arrival on the scene, as it were--he's not going to let it fly by with false modesty. Though he doesn't read the oceans of commentary, nor the commentary on the commentary, about Girls that's practically inescapable if you read newspapers, magazines or the Internet, he does manage to find out what's being written about himself.

"I just have a Google alert for my name," he said. "Though it's quite porous."

With an inescapable cloud of Girls-fame hanging over him, Mr. Karpovsky did confess that fans often confuse him for Ray, as have recent interviewers. But the truth is that there’s less of Mr. Karpovsky in his most famous character than one may think. Ray is a Greek Orthodox orphan while Mr. Karpovsky comes from a Jewish family in Boston, where his father is a scientist. Ray is sour and prone to screaming matches over stuff like (literal) garbage while Mr. Karpovsky is harder to ruffle.

"They'll just use Ray and Alex interchangeably," he said, referring to journalists and Internet fans alike. "Sometimes I let it go. Other people will say 'That's the most Jewishy-Jewy motherfucker. How is he not Jewish?'" -Drew Grant

By Alex Bedder

1. The philosopher Rene Girard developed the concept of "mimetic desire," the theory that all of our desires are really borrowed from other people--we see someone else in the bath and then we want to get in--and that denying this very normal and natural fact will only lead to conflict and pain. Discuss at least two of the characters in this episode who embody Girard's theory, and how it might have helped them navigate the sticky social situations they find themselves in.

I think I know what you are getting at here, and no, Marnie's desire to be an adult was not a revelation born on the art of Booth...oh. I see. You are literally talking about Jessa getting into the bath with Hannah and blowing a snot rocket. Very mature.

Alas, that's not really an example of Girard's theory: the relationship between the model (Hannah) and the object (a bath) does not cause the subject (Jessa) to start wishing that she was smart or virtuous enough to draw her own bath. But leaving Quixotic impulses aside, if someone could impart to Jessa that she'd have an easier time of it if she embraced her entitled little rich girl act instead of trying to be more Bohemian-than-thou, society would be better for it.

For a better example of mimetic desire, consider  Ray's fear that his "beautiful, cute, smart 22-year-old girlfriend"--with her own apartment and autonomous life outside of it--would eventually wake up and realize that he possessed none of her superior qualities, which ultimately leads to a publicly humiliating shift in his relationship's power dynamic during dinner. That probably could have been avoided, but seeing as the audience and the characters learn simultaneously of Ray's magical personality swap with, um, some guy who is the opposite of Ray (see question 5), it's hard to think of how he could have "fixed" the situation. Except, you know, he could have not secretly moved in with Shoshanna. He's old enough to know better. (Speaking of weird things we now know about Ray: why is he like a decade older than all his friends?)

If he actually cared about his relationship continuing, he needs to move out of Shosh's place and  into Hannah's spare room.  Or get his shit together and stop hanging around feckless twenty-somethings all together. Selfishly, we still enjoy Ray's (usually) sardonic house style way too much to actually want to see him grow up.

2. Girls focuses far too often on what and how much Hannah eats, and yet in this episode she cooks and bakes for others. Does this indicate an attempt to modulate her selfish character, or is it simply her trying to shore up her remaining friendships when those closest to her have "double-crossed" her?

How can Hannah modulate a character trait she is unaware of? If anything, she thinks of herself as being the overly generous, selfless friend in the group. The show began with her throwing a dinner party for Jessa,  the second season opened with her having a karaoke party in honor of her new roommate...I don't think serving limp Thai noodles and a bunt cake actually shows much effort on Hannah's part. Which makes sense, because she only invited her Tier C friends.

However, this is a passive-aggressive dinner party--which is really quite evolved  for Hannah, as it shows that she took others' feelings into account while planning it, if only to get as far as "I'm mad at Marnie, so I'll invite Charlie and Audrey over." Still, you can tell how little she values those two as friends, as she actually takes Marnie's side when Charlie calls her a jerk. Though that really is all on Charlie, as even his best friend Ray points out how shitty he's treating his current bitchy girlfriend.

Which...can we just pause here and admit that Charlie's transformation from beaten puppy to pathetic jerk does not make him even a shade more compelling? I'd like to start a petition to get rid of his character if he's going to keep being unbearable to watch. Which is not an indictment on Chris Abbott;  he was amazing on Enlightened last week.
But at this point the show could only save Charlie in one of two ways: Either making him have a schizophrenic break resulting in Gotham's new supervillain (The Bunt Cake Killer? Vagina Drier?), or reveal the reason he's so bland and lackluster stems from his parents being, like, super famous.

3. What's worse: Jessa being unwilling to lie to Thomas-John's parents to preserve social decorum but spending months lying to him and to herself about the viability of their relationship, or Thomas John having no problem fictionalizing their life (e.g. inventing a graphic design career for her), but finally demanding the most basic truth in the form of cold, hard cash? Does either of them win the argument? (Bonus question: how would Joan Didion, aunt of Griffin Dunne, who plays T.J.'s father, characterize this fight?)

Jessa is the worst this episode. Yes, Thomas-John is also the worst in general, and maybe that's the one thing that kept this relationship going as long as it did. We've all had that one, terrible romance that resembled nothing so much as an erotic regional theater production of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf, right? But Jessa gets 1st place in hypocrisy  this episode for exactly the reason you mentioned. Why does she feel the need to suddenly take a stand when it comes to this guy's WASPY parents...especially when the dad doesn't really seem to give a shit how much heroin his daughter-in-law did? What is she trying to prove, and to whom?

Grow up, girl. You can rail against yuppies all you want, but if you marry one in a pop-up wedding, prepare to have less of a leg with a shitty tiger tattoo to stand on. At least with T.J., we got a glimpse of what he was like when not being a d-bag. Even if he was delusional about his marriage, we did see a more tender, loving side of him. (BOX OF PUPPIES!)

But with Jessa, it's being-terrible business as usual. Her personality is just one long, emasculating, associate professor burn:

Bonus: Are we sure that T.J.'s dad wasn't played by Dudley Moore? Either way, Didion would have a lot to say about her new family. Such as: "We tell ourselves stories in order to live"; or "Innocence ends when one is stripped of the delusion that one likes oneself."

And of course she'll weigh in on Jessa and Thomas-John's annulment with a story of her own:

"That was the year, my twenty-eighth, when I was discovering that not all of the promises would be kept, that some things are in fact irrevocable and that it had counted after all, every evasion and every procrastination, every mistake, every word, all of it."

4. Is the butt plug yet another of this show's many symbols of arrested development? Things to think about: the idea of being clogged or stuffed up, Freud's anal stage, the faraway look in Ray's eyes.

The butt plug is a litmus test for figuring out the emotional/social stunted-ness of a character. See, it's easy to imagine someone persuading Elijah, Hannah, Charlie or Thomas-John--the four most immature people on the show-- to add a butt plug into their sex play. On the other hand, it's hard (though not impossible) to imagine Adam, Ray, or hell, even Shoshanna being coerced out of their anal comfort zone by a big blue hand-me-down still covered in lube from God knows who.

5. Based on the fact that her reaction upon learning about butt plugs is to ask if Ray wanted to use one, and that upon understanding just how much of a loser he is, she confesses that she is falling in love, is Shoshanna an amazing girlfriend, or the world's best girlfriend?

Whoa, really bro? That whole Shosh/Ray plot was not working for me this episode. First of all, since when is Ray this pathetic, homeless "loser"? Last season, he was the most adult character on Girls: he had a managerial--if menial--job, didn't mooch off his folks (who were dead), and chided Charlie's white whiny friends for being too solipsistic to write about real shit (like death). Ray of last season read British literature, played in a band, was up on current events, and could make a mean pot of opium tea to boot. Now all of a sudden we're supposed to believe that he was leaching off a relative for free housing, can't afford an apartment, and has no interests, hobbies or worldly possessions besides an autographed Andy Kaufman photo and a love of Ally McBeal? That he is, essentially, a less functional adult that anyone else on the show?

Weak developmental sauce.

As for Shoshanna, I read that first reaction to the butt plug as being one of mild disgust. As in "Oh my god, please tell me that you have never tried that and never will." No, the virgin of yesteryear is not suddenly blase about incorporating such a kinky object into her love life, especially if she had never heard of it before. (Which is truly extraordinary...wasn't there was a Sex and the City episode that would addressed anal plugging?)

As for anyone who declares their love for the first time at the Bedford L on a weekend, they deserve whatever personal hell of a codependent relationship results from it. I was disappointed in both of those two this evening. I want these guys to take some time, go back to their respective houses/Mitsubishis, and think about what they've done.

Boardman. (Patrick McMullan/Patrick McMullan)

“I wish there were more neocon blondes involved … Otherwise I’m not registered to vote—because if Andy Warhol didn’t, why do I have to?” Cat Marnell cozied up to The Observer Wednesday night at Paper magazine’s eighth annual nightlife awards, offering us her views on the 2012 presidential race.

Removing a tragic fur coat, Ms. Marnell, a Best Nightlife Social Media Star nominee, revealed the now slightly smudged words “Chinese Democracy” written across her forearms in what we can only assume was black eyeliner.

“My political stance is Chinese Democracy.”

Uncertain, we asked her what this meant.

“I don’t know exactly. I was going to go with ‘manifest destiny’—I don’t know what that means either,” she said, flipping her head of blond hair to the side as she spoke. “I support Guns N’ Roses and I hope they get back together.” (Chinese Democracy is the title of a less-than-successful Guns N’ Roses album, which came out in 2008.)

What did she plan to do with award, should she be so fortunate?

“I’d really like to speak out about [getting the band back together], and I really don’t think young children shouldn’t be prescribed Adderall—so that’s my platform.”

Contemplating this, we grabbed a much-needed drink off a fast-walking cocktail model-waitress.

Disco balls hung by flimsy string from the rafters and cluttered the floor of the Grand Ballroom, while purple and green streamers fluttered in the air with every pulse of the fog machines. The tiny tables splayed out before the stage served poorly to fit the big personalities and bigger costumes meant to be sitting at them. Stray elbows from the impromptu dancing that had broken out at the Westgay table continually ruffled neighbor Kayvon Zand’s feather chest-piece, which extended about a foot above and behind him.

We gravitated towards Girls actor and presenter Alex Karpovsky, who seemed somewhat out of place amid the wigs and rhinestones, wearing a gray suit with his hands held behind his back. He described his nightlife to us as “slow, reflective, dreamy and soporific,” often involving “Sleepytime tea with honey.”

Sounded good to us. So why was he here at a nightlife event?  To catch up with friends and see familiar faces, of course.

Legendary Damon,perhaps?

We felt partial to British singer Rita Ora’s answer to the ubiquitous question: Her favorite part of New York nightlife? The food.

The eclectic mix of presenters, while nice to look at, failed miserably to speak directly into their microphones while delivering their scripted lines, losing the jokes entirely into the abyss of unending chitter-chatter coming from the audience. In what seemed to be an attempt to call attention back to them, an occasional “Go Obama!” was thrown out mid-introduction, continuing the strange, pseudo-political current running mindlessly amok throughout the evening.

When a drunken guest finally climbed onstage to take the mic from birthday boy and editorial director Mickey Boardman, with the cough syrupy aftertaste of our drink still lingering in our mouths, we realized what we had been reminded of all night: a prom, one desperately in need of a Kelly-Kapowski-esque dance committee chairperson. We think someone spiked the punch.

October cover girl Ellie Goulding gave a special performance at the night’s end, but her distinctive voice could only be made out in a few places over the static-y bass tones.

Party aficionado Andrew W.K., a Best Party nominee—true to form in stained pants and shirt—spoke to us about several different types of parties. He was planning to take a break Thursday night, the night voted Best Night to Go Out, not because he is going to be watching the vice presidential debate, but because he has another, less raucous, awards ceremony to attend: his father’s.

“If law professorship was a party, then he is getting an award for that,” he explained.

He did have plans to watch a rerun of the debate—which his wife, Cherie Lily, suggested he make a remix of and play at a club.

“I try to influence live events on TV like [the debate] psychically, but I can do that even if I’m not watching.”

What did he hope to influence on Thursday?

“The partying. I think when times have gotten tough, it seems inappropriate to enjoy yourself. I would look to the leaders of this country, whoever they may end up being, to encourage people to stay close to joy and not remove that from their life,” he said, “because joy can give you energy, and when you have energy you can go out and solve all the world’s problems.”