<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Bloomberg BusinessWeek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/bloomberg-businessweek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Businessweek Cover Gives a Glimpse of the Future For President-elect Barack Obama</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:37:56 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kara Bloomgarden-Smoke</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=275777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/1106_obamacover_inline4051/" rel="attachment wp-att-275785"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-275785" title="1106_ObamaCover_inline4051" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1106_obamacover_inline4051.jpeg?w=217" height="300" width="217" /></a>The cover of the new issue of <em>Bloomberg Businessweek</em> offers a terrifying glimpse of what photoshop can do to illustrate how the presidency can do to the appearence. And it's not pretty.</p>
<p>In 2016, Barack Obama will have more wrinkles, more grey hair and what appears to be larger ears (or maybe they are just floppier?), according to the <em>Businessweek </em>art department. And that's just on the outside. On the inside, it may even be worse. Because the photoshop job is actually a metaphor for the difficulties that the president-elect faces.<br />
<!--more--></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/1106_romneycover_inline405/" rel="attachment wp-att-275786"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-275786" title="1106_RomneyCover_inline405" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1106_romneycover_inline405.jpeg?w=217" height="300" width="217" /></a>"This issue of <em>Bloomberg Businessweek</em> reports on the road ahead for President Obama as he faces the fiscal cliff and crucial decisions for the future of the economy, business, and defense," <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-07/cover-of-bloomberg-businessweek-marks-reelection-of-president-obama">the magazine wrote</a>. "The opposition remains considerable, and no matter how successful he is, the hardest job in the world will take its toll."</p>
<p>So celebrate and be happy now, Mr. President. Because the rapid aging process is just beginning. Oh yeah, and all the other difficult challenges of running the country. But mostly the looks things.</p>
<p><em>Businessweek</em> ran a similarly photoshopped cover of Mitt Romney that they had in reserve in case the election had turned out differently. The republican candidate may be disappointed that he didn't win, but he can take solace in the fact that he won't look like this in four years.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/1106_obamacover_inline4051/" rel="attachment wp-att-275785"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-275785" title="1106_ObamaCover_inline4051" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1106_obamacover_inline4051.jpeg?w=217" height="300" width="217" /></a>The cover of the new issue of <em>Bloomberg Businessweek</em> offers a terrifying glimpse of what photoshop can do to illustrate how the presidency can do to the appearence. And it's not pretty.</p>
<p>In 2016, Barack Obama will have more wrinkles, more grey hair and what appears to be larger ears (or maybe they are just floppier?), according to the <em>Businessweek </em>art department. And that's just on the outside. On the inside, it may even be worse. Because the photoshop job is actually a metaphor for the difficulties that the president-elect faces.<br />
<!--more--></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/1106_romneycover_inline405/" rel="attachment wp-att-275786"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-275786" title="1106_RomneyCover_inline405" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1106_romneycover_inline405.jpeg?w=217" height="300" width="217" /></a>"This issue of <em>Bloomberg Businessweek</em> reports on the road ahead for President Obama as he faces the fiscal cliff and crucial decisions for the future of the economy, business, and defense," <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-07/cover-of-bloomberg-businessweek-marks-reelection-of-president-obama">the magazine wrote</a>. "The opposition remains considerable, and no matter how successful he is, the hardest job in the world will take its toll."</p>
<p>So celebrate and be happy now, Mr. President. Because the rapid aging process is just beginning. Oh yeah, and all the other difficult challenges of running the country. But mostly the looks things.</p>
<p><em>Businessweek</em> ran a similarly photoshopped cover of Mitt Romney that they had in reserve in case the election had turned out differently. The republican candidate may be disappointed that he didn't win, but he can take solace in the fact that he won't look like this in four years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/11/businessweek-cover-gives-a-glimpse-of-the-future-for-president-elect-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3ae4eb6e34505b4a8a98a3342b6c0f35?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ksmokeobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1106_obamacover_inline4051.jpeg?w=217" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">1106_ObamaCover_inline4051</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1106_romneycover_inline405.jpeg?w=217" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">1106_RomneyCover_inline405</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Bloomberg Businessweek Cover: &#8220;It&#8217;s Global Warming, Stupid&#8221;</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/11/bloomberg-businessweek-cover-its-global-warming-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:34:52 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/11/bloomberg-businessweek-cover-its-global-warming-stupid/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=274339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/bloomberg-businessweek-cover-its-global-warming-stupid/11512_newsstand/" rel="attachment wp-att-274344"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-274344" title="bloomberg" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/11512_newsstand.jpg?w=225" height="300" width="225" /></a>Bloomberg Businessweek</em>, the magazine known for its provocative and striking covers, has dropped another one today: "IT'S GLOBAL WARMING, STUPID," reads the (huge) text, with an illustration of a flooded city street after Hurricane Sandy.</p>
<p>"<a href="https://twitter.com/Tyrangiel/status/263983816610308096">Our cover story this week may generate controversy</a>," wrote editor Josh Tyrangiel on Twitter. "But only among the stupid."</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/bloomberg-businessweek-cover-its-global-warming-stupid/11512_newsstand/" rel="attachment wp-att-274344"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-274344" title="bloomberg" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/11512_newsstand.jpg?w=225" height="300" width="225" /></a>Bloomberg Businessweek</em>, the magazine known for its provocative and striking covers, has dropped another one today: "IT'S GLOBAL WARMING, STUPID," reads the (huge) text, with an illustration of a flooded city street after Hurricane Sandy.</p>
<p>"<a href="https://twitter.com/Tyrangiel/status/263983816610308096">Our cover story this week may generate controversy</a>," wrote editor Josh Tyrangiel on Twitter. "But only among the stupid."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/11/bloomberg-businessweek-cover-its-global-warming-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/a35c3d1b27e222b5e66c510f759693b3?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ddaddarioobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/11512_newsstand.jpg?w=225" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bloomberg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Bloomberg Businessweek Gets Correction Regarding Spritzer-Drinking Protocol Out of The Economist</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/08/bloomberg-businessweek-economist-spritzer-08142012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:57:18 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/08/bloomberg-businessweek-economist-spritzer-08142012/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=257442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/08/bloomberg-businessweek-economist-spritzer-08142012/framboise/" rel="attachment wp-att-257454"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-257454" title="framboise" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/framboise.jpg?w=150" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Ever-progressive world policy journal <em>The Economist </em>ran a piece about the tragic state of sobriety in the workplace. Their argument boiled down to: Everyone is boring without booze, which while often true, isn't necessarily something you'd expect to find in <em>The Economist</em>.</p>
<p>Neither is the correction at the bottom of the piece.<!--more--></p>
<p>As noted by The Atlantic Wire, the correction on <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Awww.economist.com%2Fnode%2F21560265%3Ffsrc%3Dscn%2Ftw_ec%2Fthe_boredom_of_boozeless_business&amp;sugexp=chrome,mod=17&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8" target="_blank"><em>The Economist</em>'s workplace-boozing piece</a> reads:</p>
<blockquote><p><sub><strong>Correction:</strong> An earlier version of this article claimed that journalists at <em>Bloomberg Businessweek</em> could be disciplined for sipping a spritzer at work. This is not true. Sorry. We must have been drunk on the job.</sub></p></blockquote>
<p>As it turns out, eternal editorial wunderkind <strong>Josh Tyrangiel </strong>had <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/regret-the-error/184937/the-economist-corrects-claim-that-businessweek-journalists-cant-drink-on-the-job/" target="_blank">taken to Twitter</a> to rebuff the magazine's claim that "Hacks at Bloomberg Businessweek can be disciplined for so much as sipping a spritzer" (you should already know this, but "hacks" is British Mugglespeak for "reporters").</p>
<p>He also gave quote to <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2012/08/actually-bloomberg-businessweek-will-not-scold-you-spritzers/55757/" target="_blank">The Atlantic Wire</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"We love <em>The Economist,</em>" Tyrangiel told us over the phone. "The truth of the matter is that every staffer here has a spritzer two or three times a day, and contrary to what <em>The Economist </em>wrote, there's no scolding involved."</p></blockquote>
<p>Also:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obviously, Tyrangiel was joking: <em>Bloomberg Businessweek </em>staffers don't really drink on the job.</p></blockquote>
<p>But Tyrangiel isn't quoted saying that so <em>take it for what you will</em>.</p>
<p>And there is your Absurdist Correction of the Day.</p>
<p><em>fkamer@observer.com </em>| <a href="http://twitter.com/weareyourfek" target="_blank">@weareyourfek</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2012/08/bloomberg-businessweek-economist-spritzer-08142012/framboise/" rel="attachment wp-att-257454"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-257454" title="framboise" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/framboise.jpg?w=150" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Ever-progressive world policy journal <em>The Economist </em>ran a piece about the tragic state of sobriety in the workplace. Their argument boiled down to: Everyone is boring without booze, which while often true, isn't necessarily something you'd expect to find in <em>The Economist</em>.</p>
<p>Neither is the correction at the bottom of the piece.<!--more--></p>
<p>As noted by The Atlantic Wire, the correction on <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Awww.economist.com%2Fnode%2F21560265%3Ffsrc%3Dscn%2Ftw_ec%2Fthe_boredom_of_boozeless_business&amp;sugexp=chrome,mod=17&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8" target="_blank"><em>The Economist</em>'s workplace-boozing piece</a> reads:</p>
<blockquote><p><sub><strong>Correction:</strong> An earlier version of this article claimed that journalists at <em>Bloomberg Businessweek</em> could be disciplined for sipping a spritzer at work. This is not true. Sorry. We must have been drunk on the job.</sub></p></blockquote>
<p>As it turns out, eternal editorial wunderkind <strong>Josh Tyrangiel </strong>had <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/regret-the-error/184937/the-economist-corrects-claim-that-businessweek-journalists-cant-drink-on-the-job/" target="_blank">taken to Twitter</a> to rebuff the magazine's claim that "Hacks at Bloomberg Businessweek can be disciplined for so much as sipping a spritzer" (you should already know this, but "hacks" is British Mugglespeak for "reporters").</p>
<p>He also gave quote to <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2012/08/actually-bloomberg-businessweek-will-not-scold-you-spritzers/55757/" target="_blank">The Atlantic Wire</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"We love <em>The Economist,</em>" Tyrangiel told us over the phone. "The truth of the matter is that every staffer here has a spritzer two or three times a day, and contrary to what <em>The Economist </em>wrote, there's no scolding involved."</p></blockquote>
<p>Also:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obviously, Tyrangiel was joking: <em>Bloomberg Businessweek </em>staffers don't really drink on the job.</p></blockquote>
<p>But Tyrangiel isn't quoted saying that so <em>take it for what you will</em>.</p>
<p>And there is your Absurdist Correction of the Day.</p>
<p><em>fkamer@observer.com </em>| <a href="http://twitter.com/weareyourfek" target="_blank">@weareyourfek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/08/bloomberg-businessweek-economist-spritzer-08142012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/framboise.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/framboise.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">framboise</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f8ca6f7b44ae87c74e4272334c526ad?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fkamerobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>New York &#8216;Pregnant Over 50&#8242; Named Best Cover of 2011</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/05/new-york-pregnant-over-50-wins-best-cover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 09:15:12 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/05/new-york-pregnant-over-50-wins-best-cover/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kat Stoeffel</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/?p=237043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/05/new-york-pregnant-over-50-wins-best-cover/nymag-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-237045"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-237045" title="nymag" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/nymag.jpg?w=225&h=300" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a>The American Society of Magazine Editors named <em>New York</em>'s Demi Moore-referencing, <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/mothers-over-50-2011-10/">pregnant after 50</a> photoillustration the best cover of the year. It's certainly burned into our skull.</p>
<p>If they were giving out prizes for best ledes, the same issue of <em>New York</em> would be our top pick as well. Remember?<!--more--></p>
<blockquote><p>"The first time they had sex, during that initial exploration of unfamiliar flesh, John Ross uttered words to Ann Maloney that would sound to her like prophecy. 'You have the body of a young girl. You need a baby.'"</p>
<p>Chills!</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Bloomberg Businessweek </em>won the Business &amp; Technology category for its last-minute Steve Jobs cover.  Two different <em>Real Simple </em>covers—both blown-up photographs of flowers—won the Health &amp; Fitness and Women's Interest categories, while <em>GQ's</em> <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/07/is-it-iced-coffee-weather-gq/">Mila Kunis with iced coffee</a> cover won Men's Interest.</p>
<p>Many more accolades to come at tonight's Ellies.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/2012/05/new-york-pregnant-over-50-wins-best-cover/nymag-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-237045"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-237045" title="nymag" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/nymag.jpg?w=225&h=300" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a>The American Society of Magazine Editors named <em>New York</em>'s Demi Moore-referencing, <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/mothers-over-50-2011-10/">pregnant after 50</a> photoillustration the best cover of the year. It's certainly burned into our skull.</p>
<p>If they were giving out prizes for best ledes, the same issue of <em>New York</em> would be our top pick as well. Remember?<!--more--></p>
<blockquote><p>"The first time they had sex, during that initial exploration of unfamiliar flesh, John Ross uttered words to Ann Maloney that would sound to her like prophecy. 'You have the body of a young girl. You need a baby.'"</p>
<p>Chills!</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Bloomberg Businessweek </em>won the Business &amp; Technology category for its last-minute Steve Jobs cover.  Two different <em>Real Simple </em>covers—both blown-up photographs of flowers—won the Health &amp; Fitness and Women's Interest categories, while <em>GQ's</em> <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/07/is-it-iced-coffee-weather-gq/">Mila Kunis with iced coffee</a> cover won Men's Interest.</p>
<p>Many more accolades to come at tonight's Ellies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/05/new-york-pregnant-over-50-wins-best-cover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/nymag.jpg?w=225&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nymag</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Bloomberg BusinessWeek  Really Wants to End Bailouts</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/10/embloomberg-businessweek-em-really-wants-to-end-bailouts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:51:54 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/10/embloomberg-businessweek-em-really-wants-to-end-bailouts/</link>
			<dc:creator>Mike Taylor</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/10/embloomberg-businessweek-em-really-wants-to-end-bailouts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/3324953932_57cef5dcdc.jpg?w=300&h=225" />Apparently <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek</em> has a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/oct2010/pi20101025_234773.htm">severe beef with the very idea of any future government bailouts of U.S. financial firms</a>. Readers who use an RSS reader have seen Chris Farrell's Monday evening missive titled "End Bailouts -- No Ifs, Ands, or Buts" cycle before their eyes untold times today.</p>
<p><img src="/files/uploads/untitled.JPG" width="608" height="142" /></p>
<p><em>The Observer</em> wouldn't have said anything, but on the piece's most recent trip into our Google Reader feed, we felt we had to investigate, and it turned out we are not alone:</p>
<p><img src="/files/uploads/bailouts.JPG" width="641" height="404" /></p>
<p>We're no fans of bailouts either, and with the foreclosure crisis escalating, we're concerned about what the government might do to prop up the sector with "most favored industry" status. But simple repetition isn't going to help! At least change the phrasing. Theme and variation, guys, theme and variation.</p>
<p>mtaylor [at] observer.com | <a href="http://twitter.com/mbrookstaylor">@mbrookstaylor</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/3324953932_57cef5dcdc.jpg?w=300&h=225" />Apparently <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek</em> has a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/oct2010/pi20101025_234773.htm">severe beef with the very idea of any future government bailouts of U.S. financial firms</a>. Readers who use an RSS reader have seen Chris Farrell's Monday evening missive titled "End Bailouts -- No Ifs, Ands, or Buts" cycle before their eyes untold times today.</p>
<p><img src="/files/uploads/untitled.JPG" width="608" height="142" /></p>
<p><em>The Observer</em> wouldn't have said anything, but on the piece's most recent trip into our Google Reader feed, we felt we had to investigate, and it turned out we are not alone:</p>
<p><img src="/files/uploads/bailouts.JPG" width="641" height="404" /></p>
<p>We're no fans of bailouts either, and with the foreclosure crisis escalating, we're concerned about what the government might do to prop up the sector with "most favored industry" status. But simple repetition isn't going to help! At least change the phrasing. Theme and variation, guys, theme and variation.</p>
<p>mtaylor [at] observer.com | <a href="http://twitter.com/mbrookstaylor">@mbrookstaylor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/10/embloomberg-businessweek-em-really-wants-to-end-bailouts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/3324953932_57cef5dcdc.jpg?w=300&#38;h=225" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/uploads/untitled.JPG" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/uploads/bailouts.JPG" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Winklevoss Twins Take &#8216;Man Purses&#8217; to &#8216;Social Network&#8217; Screening</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/09/winklevoss-twins-take-man-purses-to-social-network-screening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:08:34 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/09/winklevoss-twins-take-man-purses-to-social-network-screening/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/09/winklevoss-twins-take-man-purses-to-social-network-screening/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/facebookfraud_wideweb__470x3362.jpg?w=300&h=214" />Jilted identical twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss attended a screening of "The Social Network" yesterday with <em><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_40/b4197072727718.htm">Bloomberg BusinessWeek</a></em>, to pick apart the facts from the fiction in the retelling of the Facebook creation myth. Unsurprisingly, the two Olympic rowers &mdash; who, after claiming ownership of the Facebook idea,&nbsp;successfully&nbsp;sued Mark Zuckerberg for $65 million in 2008 and are trying to leech more &mdash; were a bit dazed at seeing their onscreen personae.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>"It's a little surreal," says Cameron Winklevoss, standing outside the Sony office building in midtown Manhattan with his twin brother, Tyler. "Like hearing your voice on an answering machine."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In a cab taking them to dinner following the movie, the Winklevoss twins &mdash; who were dressed in preppy clothes and each toting "identical gray Tucano man&nbsp;purses" &mdash; discussed which scenes they found to be accurate depictions of their experience in the formation of Facebook, and which scenes were, to them, total fabrications. They praise the re-imagining of their sit-down with Harvard President Larry Summers, and admit that though they don't come out unscathed, the brutal take-downs of Napster founder Sean Parker and, of course, Zuckerberg are far more damning.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But Tyler Winklevoss called the final moment of the film, when Zuckerberg finally shows some guilt and emotion, to be a bit unrealistic.&nbsp;"The real-life Mark Zuckerberg," Tyler said, "has never shown that inner turmoil in the six years I've dealt with him."</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/facebookfraud_wideweb__470x3362.jpg?w=300&h=214" />Jilted identical twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss attended a screening of "The Social Network" yesterday with <em><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_40/b4197072727718.htm">Bloomberg BusinessWeek</a></em>, to pick apart the facts from the fiction in the retelling of the Facebook creation myth. Unsurprisingly, the two Olympic rowers &mdash; who, after claiming ownership of the Facebook idea,&nbsp;successfully&nbsp;sued Mark Zuckerberg for $65 million in 2008 and are trying to leech more &mdash; were a bit dazed at seeing their onscreen personae.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>"It's a little surreal," says Cameron Winklevoss, standing outside the Sony office building in midtown Manhattan with his twin brother, Tyler. "Like hearing your voice on an answering machine."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In a cab taking them to dinner following the movie, the Winklevoss twins &mdash; who were dressed in preppy clothes and each toting "identical gray Tucano man&nbsp;purses" &mdash; discussed which scenes they found to be accurate depictions of their experience in the formation of Facebook, and which scenes were, to them, total fabrications. They praise the re-imagining of their sit-down with Harvard President Larry Summers, and admit that though they don't come out unscathed, the brutal take-downs of Napster founder Sean Parker and, of course, Zuckerberg are far more damning.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But Tyler Winklevoss called the final moment of the film, when Zuckerberg finally shows some guilt and emotion, to be a bit unrealistic.&nbsp;"The real-life Mark Zuckerberg," Tyler said, "has never shown that inner turmoil in the six years I've dealt with him."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/09/winklevoss-twins-take-man-purses-to-social-network-screening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/facebookfraud_wideweb__470x3362.jpg?w=300&#38;h=214" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Gillette on Little Twitter Stars</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/07/gillette-on-little-twitter-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:51:19 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/07/gillette-on-little-twitter-stars/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zeke Turner</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/07/gillette-on-little-twitter-stars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"The genre of corporate Twitter writing does not, as a rule, lend itself  to brilliance. Noteworthiness is not the goal. Diligence and volume tend  to be the yardsticks by which one's opus is measured. The prolific  Scott Monty, head of social media at Ford, is often cited by his peers  as a luminary of the field. On a recent Thursday he oversaw 12 updates  on the Ford general Twitter account, eight on the Ford customer-service  Twitter, two posts on FordDriveGreen Twitter, and one on FordMustang  Twitter. That same day, Monty wrote 38 Ford-related posts on his own  Twitter account. Most were aimed at other posters, creating in sum a  long string of half-conversations, all of which were successfully  innocuous and perfectly forgettable" -- <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_30/b4188064364442.htm">Felix Gillette's on social media professionals for <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek.</em></a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The genre of corporate Twitter writing does not, as a rule, lend itself  to brilliance. Noteworthiness is not the goal. Diligence and volume tend  to be the yardsticks by which one's opus is measured. The prolific  Scott Monty, head of social media at Ford, is often cited by his peers  as a luminary of the field. On a recent Thursday he oversaw 12 updates  on the Ford general Twitter account, eight on the Ford customer-service  Twitter, two posts on FordDriveGreen Twitter, and one on FordMustang  Twitter. That same day, Monty wrote 38 Ford-related posts on his own  Twitter account. Most were aimed at other posters, creating in sum a  long string of half-conversations, all of which were successfully  innocuous and perfectly forgettable" -- <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_30/b4188064364442.htm">Felix Gillette's on social media professionals for <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/07/gillette-on-little-twitter-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Bloomberg BusinessWeek Grabs Times Tech Correspondent</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/07/embloomberg-businessweekem-grabs-emtimesem-tech-correspondent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:51:28 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/07/embloomberg-businessweekem-grabs-emtimesem-tech-correspondent/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zeke Turner</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/07/embloomberg-businessweekem-grabs-emtimesem-tech-correspondent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/0715bbwgiants.gif?w=225&h=300" /><em>New York Times</em> technology correspondent and Bits blogger Brad Stone has been scooped up by <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek</em> editor Josh Tyrangiel.</p>
<p>Mr. Stone launched his career at <em>Newsweek </em>in 1996, taking up coverage of Silicon Velly for the newsweekly two years later. He will work out of Bloomberg's San Francisco bureau.</p>
<p>He has a piece in <em>The Times</em> today about a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/technology/15verizon.html?ref=brad_stone">new smartphone</a>, the Motorola Droid X, which went on sale this morning.</p>
<p>Here's the release:</p>
<p><strong>New York, NY,  July 15, 2010</strong>-Brad Stone,  technology correspondent for The New York Times, will be joining  Bloomberg Businessweek as a senior writer in Bloomberg's San Francisco  bureau, effective August 2, 2010.&nbsp; Stone will be covering a broad range  of technology issues and companies.</p>
<p>"Brad is one of the  top journalists in his field and brings a deep knowledge of the tech  industry to Bloomberg Businessweek," said Josh Tyrangiel, Editor of  Bloomberg Businessweek.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Stone has been with  The New York Times since 2006.&nbsp; From 1998 to 2006, he served as the  Silicon Valley Correspondent for Newsweek magazine, writing for the  technology and business sections of the magazine and authoring a regular  online column. He joined the Newsweek writing staff in 1996 as a  general assignment reporter.</p>
<p>Stone graduated from  Columbia University in 1993.&nbsp; He lives with his family in San  Francisco.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/0715bbwgiants.gif?w=225&h=300" /><em>New York Times</em> technology correspondent and Bits blogger Brad Stone has been scooped up by <em>Bloomberg BusinessWeek</em> editor Josh Tyrangiel.</p>
<p>Mr. Stone launched his career at <em>Newsweek </em>in 1996, taking up coverage of Silicon Velly for the newsweekly two years later. He will work out of Bloomberg's San Francisco bureau.</p>
<p>He has a piece in <em>The Times</em> today about a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/technology/15verizon.html?ref=brad_stone">new smartphone</a>, the Motorola Droid X, which went on sale this morning.</p>
<p>Here's the release:</p>
<p><strong>New York, NY,  July 15, 2010</strong>-Brad Stone,  technology correspondent for The New York Times, will be joining  Bloomberg Businessweek as a senior writer in Bloomberg's San Francisco  bureau, effective August 2, 2010.&nbsp; Stone will be covering a broad range  of technology issues and companies.</p>
<p>"Brad is one of the  top journalists in his field and brings a deep knowledge of the tech  industry to Bloomberg Businessweek," said Josh Tyrangiel, Editor of  Bloomberg Businessweek.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Stone has been with  The New York Times since 2006.&nbsp; From 1998 to 2006, he served as the  Silicon Valley Correspondent for Newsweek magazine, writing for the  technology and business sections of the magazine and authoring a regular  online column. He joined the Newsweek writing staff in 1996 as a  general assignment reporter.</p>
<p>Stone graduated from  Columbia University in 1993.&nbsp; He lives with his family in San  Francisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/07/embloomberg-businessweekem-grabs-emtimesem-tech-correspondent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/0715bbwgiants.gif?w=225&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Businessweek Moves to Bloomberg Tower, The Economist and Reader&#8217;s Digest Are Roommates; Other Media Office Moves</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/05/embusinessweekem-moves-to-bloomberg-tower-emthe-economistem-and-ireaders-digesti-are-roommates-other-media-office-moves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:14:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/05/embusinessweekem-moves-to-bloomberg-tower-emthe-economistem-and-ireaders-digesti-are-roommates-other-media-office-moves/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zeke Turner</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/05/embusinessweekem-moves-to-bloomberg-tower-emthe-economistem-and-ireaders-digesti-are-roommates-other-media-office-moves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/new-york-times_0.jpg?w=300&h=200" /><em>Newsweek</em> has gotten the most attention for moving offices after it <a href="/2008/newsweek-plans-move-downtown-sapir-s-100-church">went downtown</a> to Hudson Street last year only to find out that it will be <a href="/2010/media/newsweek-booted-tribeca-lovely-seventh-avenue">returning to midtown</a> this summer.</p>
<p>Today <em> The Wall Street Journal</em> takes a look at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703880304575236341826598122.html#mod=todays_us_new_york">media companies in the middle of real estate moves</a>. And what better time to bring up <em>The New York Times</em>' financial situation.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Wall Street Journal now occupies space in the News Corp. building  in midtown. News Corp. acquired Journal publisher Dow Jones in 2007,  and last year moved the company out of its downtown offices.</p>
<p>Unlike  many of their peers, the New York Times Co. and Forbes stayed put. But  both now are tenants in space they used to own after their owners sold  part or all of their buildings.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Businessweek</em> will leave Rockefeller Center this month and head east to <a href="/node/38914">Bloomberg headquarters</a> on Lexington Avenue.</p>
<p>Hachette Filipacchi is moving from 50th and Broadway to the Time &amp; Life building.</p>
<p>Last month, the publisher of <em>The Economist</em> moved to 750 Third Avenue, where it will share offices with editors and executives from <em>Reader's Digest</em>.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/new-york-times_0.jpg?w=300&h=200" /><em>Newsweek</em> has gotten the most attention for moving offices after it <a href="/2008/newsweek-plans-move-downtown-sapir-s-100-church">went downtown</a> to Hudson Street last year only to find out that it will be <a href="/2010/media/newsweek-booted-tribeca-lovely-seventh-avenue">returning to midtown</a> this summer.</p>
<p>Today <em> The Wall Street Journal</em> takes a look at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703880304575236341826598122.html#mod=todays_us_new_york">media companies in the middle of real estate moves</a>. And what better time to bring up <em>The New York Times</em>' financial situation.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Wall Street Journal now occupies space in the News Corp. building  in midtown. News Corp. acquired Journal publisher Dow Jones in 2007,  and last year moved the company out of its downtown offices.</p>
<p>Unlike  many of their peers, the New York Times Co. and Forbes stayed put. But  both now are tenants in space they used to own after their owners sold  part or all of their buildings.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Businessweek</em> will leave Rockefeller Center this month and head east to <a href="/node/38914">Bloomberg headquarters</a> on Lexington Avenue.</p>
<p>Hachette Filipacchi is moving from 50th and Broadway to the Time &amp; Life building.</p>
<p>Last month, the publisher of <em>The Economist</em> moved to 750 Third Avenue, where it will share offices with editors and executives from <em>Reader's Digest</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/05/embusinessweekem-moves-to-bloomberg-tower-emthe-economistem-and-ireaders-digesti-are-roommates-other-media-office-moves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/new-york-times_0.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Reuters Launches Bloomberg-esque &#8216;Reuters Insider&#8217; for Video</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/05/reuters-launches-bloombergesque-reuters-insider-for-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:44:23 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/05/reuters-launches-bloombergesque-reuters-insider-for-video/</link>
			<dc:creator>Zeke Turner</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/05/reuters-launches-bloombergesque-reuters-insider-for-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/picture-1_14.png?w=300&h=156" />Tomorrow marks the launch of a new digital news source for financial professionals--<a href="http://etv.thomsonreuters.com/">Reuters Insider</a>, a searchable video network stocked full of niche content from all corners of the market.</p>
<p>Insider will allow subscribers to follow the specific markets that are relevant to their work and would narrow down the broad stream of market news they see on channels like CNBC.</p>
<p>David Carr <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/business/media/10carr.html">calls the service</a> "something like a You Tube for the financially interested, albeit one that is available only to Reuters subscribers, who pay as much as $2,000 a month."</p>
<blockquote><p>Reuters Insider also  produces almost real-time transcripts through voice recognition  technology &mdash; the renderings are pretty rough, but useful &mdash; and then  humans come behind and clean up some of those transcripts, while adding  additional tags, links and other relevant information.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>That metadata, along with highlighted search terms that allow the viewer  to go to the exact moment in the video when the term is  mentioned,  could become part of a new informational system in which links are  passed, video is shared and Web stars can be born</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mr. Carr also points out that Thomson Reuters' $100 million investment in the new platform, which draws revenues from pricey subscriptions, is a Bloomberg-esque move.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/picture-1_14.png?w=300&h=156" />Tomorrow marks the launch of a new digital news source for financial professionals--<a href="http://etv.thomsonreuters.com/">Reuters Insider</a>, a searchable video network stocked full of niche content from all corners of the market.</p>
<p>Insider will allow subscribers to follow the specific markets that are relevant to their work and would narrow down the broad stream of market news they see on channels like CNBC.</p>
<p>David Carr <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/business/media/10carr.html">calls the service</a> "something like a You Tube for the financially interested, albeit one that is available only to Reuters subscribers, who pay as much as $2,000 a month."</p>
<blockquote><p>Reuters Insider also  produces almost real-time transcripts through voice recognition  technology &mdash; the renderings are pretty rough, but useful &mdash; and then  humans come behind and clean up some of those transcripts, while adding  additional tags, links and other relevant information.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>That metadata, along with highlighted search terms that allow the viewer  to go to the exact moment in the video when the term is  mentioned,  could become part of a new informational system in which links are  passed, video is shared and Web stars can be born</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mr. Carr also points out that Thomson Reuters' $100 million investment in the new platform, which draws revenues from pricey subscriptions, is a Bloomberg-esque move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/05/reuters-launches-bloombergesque-reuters-insider-for-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/picture-1_14.png?w=300&#38;h=156" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
