<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; boobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/boobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:33:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Futher Evidence Apple&#8217;s Censors Are Complete Hypocrites</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/futher-evidence-apples-censors-are-complete-hypocrites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:43:55 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/futher-evidence-apples-censors-are-complete-hypocrites/</link>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/futher-evidence-apples-censors-are-complete-hypocrites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/apple-censorship.jpg?w=300&h=191" />Four weeks after it was submitted to Apple, the <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/11/16/esquire-sexiest-woman-alive-app-store/">November issue of <em>Esquire</em> still hasn't been approved for the iPad</a>. Mashable reports that the app was deemed too risque, and that Hearst has resubmitted a less sexual version.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, British tabloid <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3228523/Check-out-Page-360-on-your-iPad.html"><em>The Sun</em> introduced page 360 for the iPad</a>, displaying topless ladies on the tablet device from every conceivable angle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/technology/23apps.html">Apple sparked a storm of complaints back in February</a> when it removed dozens of low level apps for sexual content, but allowed major publishers like <em>ESPN</em> and <em>Playboy</em> to remain, despite instances of nudity.</p>
<p>"The difference is this is a well-known company with previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format," Philip W. Schiller, head of worldwide product marketing at Apple,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/technology/23apps.html"> told <em>The New York Times </em></a>about the February snafu.<em> </em></p>
<p>That seems to be a way of saying that Apple's bigger partners get preferential treatment. Not that Hearst is small potatoes, but earning the right to show 360 degrees of female nudity might just require a play as Apple-friendly as&nbsp;<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-news-corp.-ipad-venture-fishing-in-wrong-pond/">launching a new, tablet-only magazine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/apple-censorship.jpg?w=300&h=191" />Four weeks after it was submitted to Apple, the <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/11/16/esquire-sexiest-woman-alive-app-store/">November issue of <em>Esquire</em> still hasn't been approved for the iPad</a>. Mashable reports that the app was deemed too risque, and that Hearst has resubmitted a less sexual version.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, British tabloid <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3228523/Check-out-Page-360-on-your-iPad.html"><em>The Sun</em> introduced page 360 for the iPad</a>, displaying topless ladies on the tablet device from every conceivable angle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/technology/23apps.html">Apple sparked a storm of complaints back in February</a> when it removed dozens of low level apps for sexual content, but allowed major publishers like <em>ESPN</em> and <em>Playboy</em> to remain, despite instances of nudity.</p>
<p>"The difference is this is a well-known company with previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format," Philip W. Schiller, head of worldwide product marketing at Apple,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/technology/23apps.html"> told <em>The New York Times </em></a>about the February snafu.<em> </em></p>
<p>That seems to be a way of saying that Apple's bigger partners get preferential treatment. Not that Hearst is small potatoes, but earning the right to show 360 degrees of female nudity might just require a play as Apple-friendly as&nbsp;<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-news-corp.-ipad-venture-fishing-in-wrong-pond/">launching a new, tablet-only magazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/futher-evidence-apples-censors-are-complete-hypocrites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/apple-censorship.jpg?w=300&#38;h=191" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
