<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Central park views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/central-park-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>&#8220;Priceless&#8221; Views Of The Park Not Quite Priceless, But Very Expensive Nonetheless</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/05/priceless-views-of-the-park-not-quite-priceless-but-very-expensive-nonetheless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:19:47 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/05/priceless-views-of-the-park-not-quite-priceless-but-very-expensive-nonetheless/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kim Velsey</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=243030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_243073" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/05/priceless-views-of-the-park-not-quite-priceless-but-very-expensive-nonetheless/centralpark/" rel="attachment wp-att-243073"><img class="size-large wp-image-243073" title="The most glorious of views (or at least the most expensive)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/centralpark.jpg?w=600" alt="" width="600" height="399" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The most glorious of views—or at least the most expensive (Brown Harris Stevens).</p></div></p>
<p>Ever wonder what a Central Park view—that most coveted of coveted features, that most desirable of desirable details—actually translates to in terms of cold, hard cash?</p>
<p>Quite a lot, in fact. Apartments with Central Park views fetch <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303674004577434732519633786.html?mod=WSJ_NY_RealEstate_LEFTTopStories">more than twice as much as surrounding apartments</a>, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reports. And if you just look at co-ops it's three times as much!</p>
<p>Forget the waterfront. All New Yorkers care about is tree line, tree line, tree line.<!--more--></p>
<p>The big premium buyers are willing to pay for Park is at its highest level since 2008, according to <em>The Journal. </em>Yet another sign of the <a href="http://observer.com/2012/04/fire-sale-luxury-home-contracts-were-raging-last-week/">cash-flush luxury market</a> these days? It seems that buyers are all too happy to swoop in and pick up a pricey pad. As long as it's on the Park!</p>
<p>"For being such an outgoing and outspoken culture here, we are very inward looking," Jonathan Miller commented to <em>The Journal</em>, noting the difference between New York and water-loving cities.</p>
<p>Some brokers are hopeful that the wealthy New Yorkers will learn to love the waterfront in coming years, where the air is fresh and pure? as one sales manager notes hopefully.</p>
<p>Most likely, buyers on the hunt for the most luxurious of pads will simply be looking for <em>both</em> waterfront and park views.</p>
<p><em>kvelsey@observer.com</em></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_243073" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/05/priceless-views-of-the-park-not-quite-priceless-but-very-expensive-nonetheless/centralpark/" rel="attachment wp-att-243073"><img class="size-large wp-image-243073" title="The most glorious of views (or at least the most expensive)" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/centralpark.jpg?w=600" alt="" width="600" height="399" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The most glorious of views—or at least the most expensive (Brown Harris Stevens).</p></div></p>
<p>Ever wonder what a Central Park view—that most coveted of coveted features, that most desirable of desirable details—actually translates to in terms of cold, hard cash?</p>
<p>Quite a lot, in fact. Apartments with Central Park views fetch <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303674004577434732519633786.html?mod=WSJ_NY_RealEstate_LEFTTopStories">more than twice as much as surrounding apartments</a>, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reports. And if you just look at co-ops it's three times as much!</p>
<p>Forget the waterfront. All New Yorkers care about is tree line, tree line, tree line.<!--more--></p>
<p>The big premium buyers are willing to pay for Park is at its highest level since 2008, according to <em>The Journal. </em>Yet another sign of the <a href="http://observer.com/2012/04/fire-sale-luxury-home-contracts-were-raging-last-week/">cash-flush luxury market</a> these days? It seems that buyers are all too happy to swoop in and pick up a pricey pad. As long as it's on the Park!</p>
<p>"For being such an outgoing and outspoken culture here, we are very inward looking," Jonathan Miller commented to <em>The Journal</em>, noting the difference between New York and water-loving cities.</p>
<p>Some brokers are hopeful that the wealthy New Yorkers will learn to love the waterfront in coming years, where the air is fresh and pure? as one sales manager notes hopefully.</p>
<p>Most likely, buyers on the hunt for the most luxurious of pads will simply be looking for <em>both</em> waterfront and park views.</p>
<p><em>kvelsey@observer.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/05/priceless-views-of-the-park-not-quite-priceless-but-very-expensive-nonetheless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/43304efa56123b72936b39839dd0a8a6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kvelseyobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/centralpark.jpg?w=600" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The most glorious of views (or at least the most expensive)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
