<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; content business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/content-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Aol&#8217;s Insidious Plan to Run Profitable Content Business Revealed</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2011/02/aols-insidious-plan-to-run-profitable-content-business-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:19:37 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2011/02/aols-insidious-plan-to-run-profitable-content-business-revealed/</link>
			<dc:creator>Mike Taylor</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2011/02/aols-insidious-plan-to-run-profitable-content-business-revealed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/aol-running-man-logo.jpg?w=300&h=211" />The Business Insider earlier today <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-aol-way#-1">obtained</a> a 58-slide document detailing Aol's content business plan, and the result has been a distinct bout of queasiness among journalists and media pundits.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"The Aol Way" reveals the company's desire that its consumer-facing websites be able to compete with rival sites without the considerable traffic subsidy offered by links from Aol's homepage. It also provides a hard-nosed look at what kind of traffic a given story would have to do given its production costs. Taken to its logical extreme, the manifesto reads like the Demand Media model, only even more aggressively dumb and cheap.</p>
<p>TheNextWeb asks, "<a href="http://thenextweb.com/media/2011/02/01/is-aol-destroying-tech-journalism/">Is Aol Destroying Journalism for Pageviews?</a>" Mark Coatney of Tumblr wonders what kind of<a href="http://markcoatney.com/post/3052869094/so-many-questions-about-this-for-instance-this"> premium content can be bought for $250</a>. And inquiring minds want to know: What does Aol-owned TechCrunch, which is <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/01/michael_arrington_bites_down_o.html">prone to assert its independence</a>, have to say about the memo? So far, mum's the word in the house of Arrington.</p>
<p>mtaylor [at] observer.com | <a href="http://twitter.com/mbrookstaylor">@mbrookstaylor</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/aol-running-man-logo.jpg?w=300&h=211" />The Business Insider earlier today <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-aol-way#-1">obtained</a> a 58-slide document detailing Aol's content business plan, and the result has been a distinct bout of queasiness among journalists and media pundits.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"The Aol Way" reveals the company's desire that its consumer-facing websites be able to compete with rival sites without the considerable traffic subsidy offered by links from Aol's homepage. It also provides a hard-nosed look at what kind of traffic a given story would have to do given its production costs. Taken to its logical extreme, the manifesto reads like the Demand Media model, only even more aggressively dumb and cheap.</p>
<p>TheNextWeb asks, "<a href="http://thenextweb.com/media/2011/02/01/is-aol-destroying-tech-journalism/">Is Aol Destroying Journalism for Pageviews?</a>" Mark Coatney of Tumblr wonders what kind of<a href="http://markcoatney.com/post/3052869094/so-many-questions-about-this-for-instance-this"> premium content can be bought for $250</a>. And inquiring minds want to know: What does Aol-owned TechCrunch, which is <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/01/michael_arrington_bites_down_o.html">prone to assert its independence</a>, have to say about the memo? So far, mum's the word in the house of Arrington.</p>
<p>mtaylor [at] observer.com | <a href="http://twitter.com/mbrookstaylor">@mbrookstaylor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2011/02/aols-insidious-plan-to-run-profitable-content-business-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/aol-running-man-logo.jpg?w=300&#38;h=211" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
