<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; danger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/danger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Let the Bicycle Backlash Begin</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/10/let-the-bicycle-backlash-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:20:06 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/10/let-the-bicycle-backlash-begin/</link>
			<dc:creator>Matt Chaban</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/10/let-the-bicycle-backlash-begin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bike_joust.jpg?w=199&h=300" />It used to be that biking in the city fell into the domain of messengers, mad men <a href="http://www.davidbyrne.com/art/books/bicycle_diaries/">and David Byrne</a>. Now, thanks to the Bloomberg administration and <a href="/2008/real-estate/bloomberg-s-street-fighter">progressive streets czarina Janette Sadik-Khan</a>, bike lanes are all over the damn place -- the city has added 250 miles of the designated paths over the past four years -- and the streets are safer and more enjoyable for everyone.</p>
<p>Well, maybe. As the already crowded streets get <a href="/2010/real-estate/friday-afternoon-conspiracy-union-square-improvements-could-kill-people">more crowded</a>, things can go wrong. Deliveries are missed, parking is harder to find, <a href="/2010/real-estate/bike-lanes-actually-kinda-dangerous">babies get left in bike lanes</a>, <a href="http://gothamist.com/2010/10/14/cyclist_impaled_on_hudson_river_bik.php">joggers get impaled</a>. (Life in New York is <a href="/2010/real-estate/friday-afternoon-conspiracy-union-square-improvements-could-kill-people">so hard</a>!)</p>
<p>Naturally, a backlash is underway. Not in Queens or Staten Island, though, but the beating heart of boho New York. Both the East Village and Park Slope are home to relatively new bike lanes -- one on First and Second avenues, the other along Prospect Park West. Apparently, some locals are not happy about the interference the new lanes are causing to their usual routine -- like double parking and standing in the middle of the street while waiting to cross it -- and so <a href="http://gothamist.com/2010/10/14/two_anti-bike_lane_protests_aim_to.php">protests have been planned</a>! As have <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/10/14/next-thursday-a-neighborly-rally-for-the-traffic-calming-ppw-bike-lane/">counter-protests</a>! Things could get ugly.</p>
<p>We've been here before. Last year, Councilman Alan Gerson (an elected official, for gosh sakes) <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/08/21/gerson-on-grand-street-safety-never-mind-the-facts/">led a protest</a> of the then-new Grand Street bike lane. Which is still very much there 14 months later. Then again, a bunch of politically connected Chasidim got <a href="http://www.brooklyntheborough.com/2010/01/meeting-on-bedford-bike-lanes-ends-in-detente-for-now/">a lane erased in South Brooklyn</a>, supposedly in exchange for voting for the mayor. According to an online poll from <em>Crain's</em>, people are <a href="http://mycrains.crainsnewyork.com/polls/2010/10/should-we-pull-the-plug-on-man.php">overwhelmingly in favor of bike lanes</a>. Then again, that's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias">not the most scientific</a> proof. For all anybody knows, those voting for bike lanes could just be a bunch of madmen.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:mchaban@observer.com">mchaban [at] observer.com</a> </strong>/<strong> <a>@mc_nyo</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bike_joust.jpg?w=199&h=300" />It used to be that biking in the city fell into the domain of messengers, mad men <a href="http://www.davidbyrne.com/art/books/bicycle_diaries/">and David Byrne</a>. Now, thanks to the Bloomberg administration and <a href="/2008/real-estate/bloomberg-s-street-fighter">progressive streets czarina Janette Sadik-Khan</a>, bike lanes are all over the damn place -- the city has added 250 miles of the designated paths over the past four years -- and the streets are safer and more enjoyable for everyone.</p>
<p>Well, maybe. As the already crowded streets get <a href="/2010/real-estate/friday-afternoon-conspiracy-union-square-improvements-could-kill-people">more crowded</a>, things can go wrong. Deliveries are missed, parking is harder to find, <a href="/2010/real-estate/bike-lanes-actually-kinda-dangerous">babies get left in bike lanes</a>, <a href="http://gothamist.com/2010/10/14/cyclist_impaled_on_hudson_river_bik.php">joggers get impaled</a>. (Life in New York is <a href="/2010/real-estate/friday-afternoon-conspiracy-union-square-improvements-could-kill-people">so hard</a>!)</p>
<p>Naturally, a backlash is underway. Not in Queens or Staten Island, though, but the beating heart of boho New York. Both the East Village and Park Slope are home to relatively new bike lanes -- one on First and Second avenues, the other along Prospect Park West. Apparently, some locals are not happy about the interference the new lanes are causing to their usual routine -- like double parking and standing in the middle of the street while waiting to cross it -- and so <a href="http://gothamist.com/2010/10/14/two_anti-bike_lane_protests_aim_to.php">protests have been planned</a>! As have <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/10/14/next-thursday-a-neighborly-rally-for-the-traffic-calming-ppw-bike-lane/">counter-protests</a>! Things could get ugly.</p>
<p>We've been here before. Last year, Councilman Alan Gerson (an elected official, for gosh sakes) <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/08/21/gerson-on-grand-street-safety-never-mind-the-facts/">led a protest</a> of the then-new Grand Street bike lane. Which is still very much there 14 months later. Then again, a bunch of politically connected Chasidim got <a href="http://www.brooklyntheborough.com/2010/01/meeting-on-bedford-bike-lanes-ends-in-detente-for-now/">a lane erased in South Brooklyn</a>, supposedly in exchange for voting for the mayor. According to an online poll from <em>Crain's</em>, people are <a href="http://mycrains.crainsnewyork.com/polls/2010/10/should-we-pull-the-plug-on-man.php">overwhelmingly in favor of bike lanes</a>. Then again, that's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias">not the most scientific</a> proof. For all anybody knows, those voting for bike lanes could just be a bunch of madmen.</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:mchaban@observer.com">mchaban [at] observer.com</a> </strong>/<strong> <a>@mc_nyo</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/10/let-the-bicycle-backlash-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bike_joust.jpg?w=199&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Lithium-Ion Batteries Will (Probably Not) Kill Us All, But&#8230;</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/08/lithiumion-batteries-will-probably-not-kill-us-all-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:30:45 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/08/lithiumion-batteries-will-probably-not-kill-us-all-but/</link>
			<dc:creator>Steve Huff</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/08/lithiumion-batteries-will-probably-not-kill-us-all-but/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/iphone-lithium-ion-battery.jpg?w=292&h=300" />The latest peril lurking in your friendly skies: lithium-ion batteries. They're in our cellphones, laptops and a wide variety of other electronic devices - devices that we're already tasked to turn off at the beginning of a flight for fear the aircraft's autopilot may pull a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000" target="_blank">HAL 9000</a> at 36,000 feet.</p>
<p><em>USA Today</em> <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-08-16-airlinebatteries16_CV_N.htm">reports</a> that these ubiquitous, rechargeable and sometimes impossible to remove batteries are a fairly new and serious concern for airlines. A concern that has nothing to do with possibly causing navigational woes:</p>
<blockquote><p>FAA  data show that from March 20, 1991, through Aug. 3, 2010, batteries and battery-powered devices were involved in 113 incidents with "smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion" on passenger and cargo planes. The data are for lithium and non-lithium batteries and are not a complete list of such incidents, the agency says.</p>
<p>In January, the Transportation Department proposed stricter rules for companies that ship lithium batteries in cargo holds. "The frequency of incidents, combined with the difficulty in extinguishing lithium-battery fires, warrants taking strong action," Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill., chairman of the House aviation subcommittee, said of the Transportation Department's proposal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>An overheated lithium battery can cause a small explosion and the fire may not always be all that easy to put out. There is, however, no limit on how many of these a single passenger can carry on a given flight. Last June an American Airlines flight crew took 58 devices using these batteries from one passenger on a flight from New York to Buenos Aires.</p>
<p>If restrictions are passed on electronic devices using these batteries requiring their removal before boarding a flight, users of Apple devices in particular are going to find themselves with a serious problem, as many of the smaller Apple products require the battery be removed at an Apple store.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/iphone-lithium-ion-battery.jpg?w=292&h=300" />The latest peril lurking in your friendly skies: lithium-ion batteries. They're in our cellphones, laptops and a wide variety of other electronic devices - devices that we're already tasked to turn off at the beginning of a flight for fear the aircraft's autopilot may pull a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000" target="_blank">HAL 9000</a> at 36,000 feet.</p>
<p><em>USA Today</em> <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-08-16-airlinebatteries16_CV_N.htm">reports</a> that these ubiquitous, rechargeable and sometimes impossible to remove batteries are a fairly new and serious concern for airlines. A concern that has nothing to do with possibly causing navigational woes:</p>
<blockquote><p>FAA  data show that from March 20, 1991, through Aug. 3, 2010, batteries and battery-powered devices were involved in 113 incidents with "smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion" on passenger and cargo planes. The data are for lithium and non-lithium batteries and are not a complete list of such incidents, the agency says.</p>
<p>In January, the Transportation Department proposed stricter rules for companies that ship lithium batteries in cargo holds. "The frequency of incidents, combined with the difficulty in extinguishing lithium-battery fires, warrants taking strong action," Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill., chairman of the House aviation subcommittee, said of the Transportation Department's proposal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>An overheated lithium battery can cause a small explosion and the fire may not always be all that easy to put out. There is, however, no limit on how many of these a single passenger can carry on a given flight. Last June an American Airlines flight crew took 58 devices using these batteries from one passenger on a flight from New York to Buenos Aires.</p>
<p>If restrictions are passed on electronic devices using these batteries requiring their removal before boarding a flight, users of Apple devices in particular are going to find themselves with a serious problem, as many of the smaller Apple products require the battery be removed at an Apple store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/08/lithiumion-batteries-will-probably-not-kill-us-all-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/iphone-lithium-ion-battery.jpg?w=292&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
