<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Election Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/election-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Big Apple Idolatry: Jon Hamm&#8217;s Penis Leans Left (And is a Democrat as Well)</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/11/big-apple-idolatry-zombie-apocolypse-thankfully-almos-upon-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:24:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/11/big-apple-idolatry-zombie-apocolypse-thankfully-almos-upon-us/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=275589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>- Feel like you just spent the day totally brain dead, shuffling mindlessly with hundreds of other glazed-eyed former human beings for several hours? Don't worry, the election is almost over, and Brad Pitt's adaptation of <em>World War Z</em> <a href="http://screenrant.com/world-war-z-movie-trailer/">finally has a trailer</a>!<br />
<!--more--><br />
http://youtu.be/t3hYKPt0uJQ</p>
<p>- MTV is <a href="http://jezebel.com/5958167/mtv-to-air-live-fundraiser-to-rebuild-seaside-heights">going to hold a live fundraiser for the Jersey shore</a>. It's about time they paid back to the community they took so, so much from. </p>
<p>- Jon Hamm's <a href="http://dlisted.com/2012/11/06/jons-hammaconda-endorses-obama">penis</a> is an Obama supporter, naturally. </p>
<p>- Here are the two main characters of <a href="http://videogum.com/609522/does-this-make-you-want-to-vote-more-or-to-vote-less/psas/">your favorite TV show of all time</a>, telling babies to get out and vote.<br />
http://youtu.be/QJpv_1YkFLs</p>
<p>-Here are <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/celebrities-voting-hilary-duff-heidi-klum_n_2083863.html">photos of all the celebrities voting on Election Day</a>. ALL of them. Thanks, Huffington Post!</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Feel like you just spent the day totally brain dead, shuffling mindlessly with hundreds of other glazed-eyed former human beings for several hours? Don't worry, the election is almost over, and Brad Pitt's adaptation of <em>World War Z</em> <a href="http://screenrant.com/world-war-z-movie-trailer/">finally has a trailer</a>!<br />
<!--more--><br />
http://youtu.be/t3hYKPt0uJQ</p>
<p>- MTV is <a href="http://jezebel.com/5958167/mtv-to-air-live-fundraiser-to-rebuild-seaside-heights">going to hold a live fundraiser for the Jersey shore</a>. It's about time they paid back to the community they took so, so much from. </p>
<p>- Jon Hamm's <a href="http://dlisted.com/2012/11/06/jons-hammaconda-endorses-obama">penis</a> is an Obama supporter, naturally. </p>
<p>- Here are the two main characters of <a href="http://videogum.com/609522/does-this-make-you-want-to-vote-more-or-to-vote-less/psas/">your favorite TV show of all time</a>, telling babies to get out and vote.<br />
http://youtu.be/QJpv_1YkFLs</p>
<p>-Here are <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/celebrities-voting-hilary-duff-heidi-klum_n_2083863.html">photos of all the celebrities voting on Election Day</a>. ALL of them. Thanks, Huffington Post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/11/big-apple-idolatry-zombie-apocolypse-thankfully-almos-upon-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/image.jpg?w=94" />
		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/image.jpg?w=94" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">image</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/66171f102efbbabd4a08d4202ed36b91?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dgrantobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Beyoncé, Registered-Independent Lena Dunham Make Election Day a Fashion&#8217;s Day Out</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/11/beyonce-registered-independent-lena-dunham-spotlight-their-election-looks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:12:57 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/11/beyonce-registered-independent-lena-dunham-spotlight-their-election-looks/</link>
			<dc:creator>Daniel D'Addario</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=275481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_275483" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/beyonce-registered-independent-lena-dunham-spotlight-their-election-looks/tumblr_md2ka5qy8k1rqgjz2o1_1280/" rel="attachment wp-att-275483"><img class="size-medium wp-image-275483" title="from iam.beyonce.com" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/tumblr_md2ka5qy8k1rqgjz2o1_1280.jpg?w=300" height="277" width="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">from iam.beyonce.com</p></div></p>
<p>Pop singer, style icon, and vocal Obama supporter Beyoncé, whose husband Jay-Z played a show in Ohio to support the President's re-election bid yesterday, <a href="http://iam.beyonce.com/post/35125627550">has posted an image of herself</a> posing with her absentee ballot.<!--more--> Apparently Beyoncé still votes in Harris County, Texas, the county of her childhood home Houston; no word on whether she voted Ted Cruz for Senate, as she blocks the ballot with her hand (showcasing a set of Bachmann-worthy manicured talons and a giant amber-colored ring--are we <em>sure </em>she's not in the GOP?).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Lena Dunham of HBO's <i>Girls </i>has spent Election Day encouraging her Twitter followers to send in their voting-day outfits: Ms. Dunham's equipped with <a href="https://twitter.com/lenadunham/status/265815638600208384">"sunglasses and a patriotic peacoat."</a> Ms. Dunham, who recently filmed <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/lena-dunhams-new-obama-ad-as-controversial-as-everything-she-does/264139/">an ad for Barack Obama</a>, is according to <a href="http://www.canivote.org/">New York State's database of voters</a> a registered independent, has been encouraging her fans to get dressed up for the polls--though when you're Beyoncé, every day is an opportunity to dress up, even when you're only walking as far as the mailbox.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_275483" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://observer.com/2012/11/beyonce-registered-independent-lena-dunham-spotlight-their-election-looks/tumblr_md2ka5qy8k1rqgjz2o1_1280/" rel="attachment wp-att-275483"><img class="size-medium wp-image-275483" title="from iam.beyonce.com" alt="" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/tumblr_md2ka5qy8k1rqgjz2o1_1280.jpg?w=300" height="277" width="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">from iam.beyonce.com</p></div></p>
<p>Pop singer, style icon, and vocal Obama supporter Beyoncé, whose husband Jay-Z played a show in Ohio to support the President's re-election bid yesterday, <a href="http://iam.beyonce.com/post/35125627550">has posted an image of herself</a> posing with her absentee ballot.<!--more--> Apparently Beyoncé still votes in Harris County, Texas, the county of her childhood home Houston; no word on whether she voted Ted Cruz for Senate, as she blocks the ballot with her hand (showcasing a set of Bachmann-worthy manicured talons and a giant amber-colored ring--are we <em>sure </em>she's not in the GOP?).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Lena Dunham of HBO's <i>Girls </i>has spent Election Day encouraging her Twitter followers to send in their voting-day outfits: Ms. Dunham's equipped with <a href="https://twitter.com/lenadunham/status/265815638600208384">"sunglasses and a patriotic peacoat."</a> Ms. Dunham, who recently filmed <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/lena-dunhams-new-obama-ad-as-controversial-as-everything-she-does/264139/">an ad for Barack Obama</a>, is according to <a href="http://www.canivote.org/">New York State's database of voters</a> a registered independent, has been encouraging her fans to get dressed up for the polls--though when you're Beyoncé, every day is an opportunity to dress up, even when you're only walking as far as the mailbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/11/beyonce-registered-independent-lena-dunham-spotlight-their-election-looks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/a35c3d1b27e222b5e66c510f759693b3?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ddaddarioobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/tumblr_md2ka5qy8k1rqgjz2o1_1280.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">from iam.beyonce.com</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The Times Tracks Twitter Buzz of Candidates With Time-Lapse Diagram</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-timesem-tracks-twitter-buzz-of-candidates-with-timelapse-diagram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 19:33:24 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-timesem-tracks-twitter-buzz-of-candidates-with-timelapse-diagram/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/emthe-timesem-tracks-twitter-buzz-of-candidates-with-timelapse-diagram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/screen-shot-2010-11-02-at-3-20-37-pm.png?w=300&h=278" />Instead of <a href="/2010/media/washington-post-promote-election-twitter-trending-topic">buying a trending topic</a> like <em>The Washington Pos</em>t did, <em>The New York Times</em> used Twitter's well of election-related data to make <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/politics/2010-twitter-candidates.html?src=tptw">an animation-based chart </a>that tracks the number of tweets devoted to candidates in all Senate and Governor races over the past few weeks.</p>
<p>As the time line elapses from Oct. 21 to the current second, each candidate's blue or red orb &mdash; for Democratic and Republican candidates, respectively and obviously &mdash; expands and shrinks according to their Twitter popularity over time. Scroll your mouse over one of the tinier circles and the candidate's name and Twitter handle will pop up. There's also a search feature. Hey, it's not as<a href="/2010/media/washington-post-promote-election-twitter-trending-topic"> game-changing</a> as buying a hashtag, but still pretty cool!</p>
<p>In case you were wondering, the most-covered candidate this election season was Christine O'Donnell, The Upshot <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101102/el_yblog_upshot/odonnell-receives-most-coverage-of-2010-candidates">reported</a> earlier today. Her circle is so engorged in the <em>Times</em> diagram that it stays at the maximum size for the entirety of the animation. And that's too bad &mdash; we would have loved to see <a href="/2010/media/gawker-editor-remy-stern-approach-odonnell-story">a spike on Oct. 28!</a></p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/screen-shot-2010-11-02-at-3-20-37-pm.png?w=300&h=278" />Instead of <a href="/2010/media/washington-post-promote-election-twitter-trending-topic">buying a trending topic</a> like <em>The Washington Pos</em>t did, <em>The New York Times</em> used Twitter's well of election-related data to make <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/politics/2010-twitter-candidates.html?src=tptw">an animation-based chart </a>that tracks the number of tweets devoted to candidates in all Senate and Governor races over the past few weeks.</p>
<p>As the time line elapses from Oct. 21 to the current second, each candidate's blue or red orb &mdash; for Democratic and Republican candidates, respectively and obviously &mdash; expands and shrinks according to their Twitter popularity over time. Scroll your mouse over one of the tinier circles and the candidate's name and Twitter handle will pop up. There's also a search feature. Hey, it's not as<a href="/2010/media/washington-post-promote-election-twitter-trending-topic"> game-changing</a> as buying a hashtag, but still pretty cool!</p>
<p>In case you were wondering, the most-covered candidate this election season was Christine O'Donnell, The Upshot <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101102/el_yblog_upshot/odonnell-receives-most-coverage-of-2010-candidates">reported</a> earlier today. Her circle is so engorged in the <em>Times</em> diagram that it stays at the maximum size for the entirety of the animation. And that's too bad &mdash; we would have loved to see <a href="/2010/media/gawker-editor-remy-stern-approach-odonnell-story">a spike on Oct. 28!</a></p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/emthe-timesem-tracks-twitter-buzz-of-candidates-with-timelapse-diagram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/screen-shot-2010-11-02-at-3-20-37-pm.png?w=300&#38;h=278" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Why the Heck Do We Vote on Tuesdays?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/why-the-heck-do-we-vote-on-tuesdays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:38:10 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/why-the-heck-do-we-vote-on-tuesdays/</link>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/why-the-heck-do-we-vote-on-tuesdays/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/polling-line.jpg?w=300&h=200" />Know why we vote on Tuesdays? Because Sunday is the Lord's day, and it takes at least a day to get to the polling place by horse and buggy. Wednesday, that's market day.</p>
<p>Hmmm. This rationale may have been convincing in 1845, when the law was passed that made Election Day a Tuesday. Now, it's just absurd.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/11/why_you_shouldnt_be_voting_tod.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nymag%2Fintel+%28Daily+Intelligencer+-+New+York+Magazine%29">Dan Amira at Daily Intel</a> points out, the number one reason people fail to vote is "No time off/too busy."</p>
<p>Amira has a great interview with <a href="http://www.whytuesday.org/">Jacob Soboroff, executive director at Why Tuesday?</a>, a group dedicated to changing when we vote. Soboroff would prefer a Saturday/Sunday vote, and says big names like Mayor Bloomberg and President Obama have endorsed this idea.</p>
<p>It seems like a good idea until you realize that it will completely disenfranchise the hipster vote, who consider Friday and Saturday sacred party days, and Sunday the Lord's way of curing a hangover.</p>
<p>bpopper [at] observer.com</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/benpopper/">@benpopper</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/polling-line.jpg?w=300&h=200" />Know why we vote on Tuesdays? Because Sunday is the Lord's day, and it takes at least a day to get to the polling place by horse and buggy. Wednesday, that's market day.</p>
<p>Hmmm. This rationale may have been convincing in 1845, when the law was passed that made Election Day a Tuesday. Now, it's just absurd.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/11/why_you_shouldnt_be_voting_tod.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nymag%2Fintel+%28Daily+Intelligencer+-+New+York+Magazine%29">Dan Amira at Daily Intel</a> points out, the number one reason people fail to vote is "No time off/too busy."</p>
<p>Amira has a great interview with <a href="http://www.whytuesday.org/">Jacob Soboroff, executive director at Why Tuesday?</a>, a group dedicated to changing when we vote. Soboroff would prefer a Saturday/Sunday vote, and says big names like Mayor Bloomberg and President Obama have endorsed this idea.</p>
<p>It seems like a good idea until you realize that it will completely disenfranchise the hipster vote, who consider Friday and Saturday sacred party days, and Sunday the Lord's way of curing a hangover.</p>
<p>bpopper [at] observer.com</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/benpopper/">@benpopper</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/why-the-heck-do-we-vote-on-tuesdays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/polling-line.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Trending on Twitter: #Election, Brought To You By The Washington Post</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/trending-on-twitter-election-brought-to-you-by-emthe-washington-postem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:09:44 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/trending-on-twitter-election-brought-to-you-by-emthe-washington-postem/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nate Freeman</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/trending-on-twitter-election-brought-to-you-by-emthe-washington-postem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/screen-shot-2010-11-02-at-9-51-15-am.png?w=300&h=199" />Happy election day, everyone! Chances are, if you've already exercised you civic duty to vote, you've taken to Twitter to air your participation in democracy to the masses. Currently, #Election is the number one trending topic in the world, and a glance at the<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23Election"> live stream</a>&nbsp;of its related tweets provides bursts of news about candidates, races, and issues.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Its place atop the Twitter totem pole was prearranged &mdash; it's a "promoted trend," which ensures it will stay on the list, right there above <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23bieber4australia">#bieber4australia.</a> But while topics have mostly been bought by, for example, film studios hyping a movie, the organization backing #Election is none other than<em> The Washington Post.</em> As a spokesperson for Twitter <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=101&amp;aid=193733">told Poynter,</a> it is the first time a media organization has promoted a hashtag on the social networking site, marking a type of collaboration that might predict how the old guard will utilize the microblogging service's ranking functions in the future.</p>
<p>When a Twitter user clicks on <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23Election">#Election</a> on the left sidebar &mdash; or whenever it's included in a tweet &mdash; the aggregated tweets containing that hash tag will be filed under a tweeted link to a Post story. The <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/washingtonpost/status/29457743649">message</a> that the paper now has in that prime real estate says "Can Michelle Obama give Harry Reid the boost he needs? A last-minute campaign swing." Then it links to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/01/AR2010110107591.html">the story.</a></p>
<p>With such a fast-track to Twitter's showcase of the moment's most vital topics, <em>The Washington Post</em> is making a bid to be the indispensable resource for all things election day, at least in the eyes of Twitter devotees. Though it will certainly give the paper's website some sort of boost today, the "Election" hashtag is essentially worthless by tomorrow. The Poynter story doesn't indicate how much the paper paid for the exposure, but it will take more than one day befor any real integration between Twitter's 140-character&nbsp;bulletins and something like the <em>Post</em>'s fully formed news reporting can take place.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Regardless of how many extra hits the deal brings the <em>Post</em>, this kind of stunt will most likely take place again. As Twitter grows it will become a more accurate reflection of the world's news pulse, and at this point we can agree that even our oldest and most cherished media organizations need Twitter more than Twitter needs them. With the estimated value of Twitter <a href="/2010/media/new-york-times-and-twitter-now-worth-same">now equal</a>, or perhaps higher, than that of <em>The New York Times</em>, this is becoming less and less surprising.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/screen-shot-2010-11-02-at-9-51-15-am.png?w=300&h=199" />Happy election day, everyone! Chances are, if you've already exercised you civic duty to vote, you've taken to Twitter to air your participation in democracy to the masses. Currently, #Election is the number one trending topic in the world, and a glance at the<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23Election"> live stream</a>&nbsp;of its related tweets provides bursts of news about candidates, races, and issues.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Its place atop the Twitter totem pole was prearranged &mdash; it's a "promoted trend," which ensures it will stay on the list, right there above <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23bieber4australia">#bieber4australia.</a> But while topics have mostly been bought by, for example, film studios hyping a movie, the organization backing #Election is none other than<em> The Washington Post.</em> As a spokesperson for Twitter <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=101&amp;aid=193733">told Poynter,</a> it is the first time a media organization has promoted a hashtag on the social networking site, marking a type of collaboration that might predict how the old guard will utilize the microblogging service's ranking functions in the future.</p>
<p>When a Twitter user clicks on <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/%23Election">#Election</a> on the left sidebar &mdash; or whenever it's included in a tweet &mdash; the aggregated tweets containing that hash tag will be filed under a tweeted link to a Post story. The <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/washingtonpost/status/29457743649">message</a> that the paper now has in that prime real estate says "Can Michelle Obama give Harry Reid the boost he needs? A last-minute campaign swing." Then it links to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/01/AR2010110107591.html">the story.</a></p>
<p>With such a fast-track to Twitter's showcase of the moment's most vital topics, <em>The Washington Post</em> is making a bid to be the indispensable resource for all things election day, at least in the eyes of Twitter devotees. Though it will certainly give the paper's website some sort of boost today, the "Election" hashtag is essentially worthless by tomorrow. The Poynter story doesn't indicate how much the paper paid for the exposure, but it will take more than one day befor any real integration between Twitter's 140-character&nbsp;bulletins and something like the <em>Post</em>'s fully formed news reporting can take place.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Regardless of how many extra hits the deal brings the <em>Post</em>, this kind of stunt will most likely take place again. As Twitter grows it will become a more accurate reflection of the world's news pulse, and at this point we can agree that even our oldest and most cherished media organizations need Twitter more than Twitter needs them. With the estimated value of Twitter <a href="/2010/media/new-york-times-and-twitter-now-worth-same">now equal</a>, or perhaps higher, than that of <em>The New York Times</em>, this is becoming less and less surprising.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="mailto:nfreeman@observer.com">nfreeman [at] observer.com</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/NFreeman1234">@nfreeman1234</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/trending-on-twitter-election-brought-to-you-by-emthe-washington-postem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/screen-shot-2010-11-02-at-9-51-15-am.png?w=300&#38;h=199" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Can Foursquare Make Voting Cool?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2010/11/can-foursquare-make-voting-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:26:40 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2010/11/can-foursquare-make-voting-cool/</link>
			<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2010/11/can-foursquare-make-voting-cool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/uploads/4%20Square%20I%20Voted.JPG" alt="4square vote" width="330" height="257" style="float: right;margin: 5px 10px" /></p>
<p><strong>Update - Noon: 11,751 voters have checked in from 7,440 locations. Video of Crowley talking elections and astronauts below.</strong></p>
<p>Foursquare users who glance at their mobile apps this morning will notice something new: polling stations near them pushed to the top of the Places page.</p>
<p>On top of this, <a href="http://elections.foursquare.com/">Foursquare has created a special "I Voted" badge</a>, which unlocks as soon as a user checks in to a polling station.</p>
<p>Will location notifications and game mechanics help to get out the vote? It's certainly an interesting experiment. As of 9:15 a.m., more than 3,800 folks had checked in to vote at some 2,300 locations all over the country.</p>
<p>"We use game mechanics to encourage people to do things we think they'll be really excited about doing," <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_social_voting_increase_real-world_participation_foursquare_founder_says_yes.php">Foursquare founder Dennis Crowley told Read Write Web</a>. "It could be traveling to different countries or seeking out new places or new experiences. I don't think of it so much as a game. It's using the mechanics to, you know, influence behavior and try to change behavior a little. And I think that really plays into some of the stuff we're doing with the I Voted Badge.</p>
<p>The group skewed 2/1 male to female, although this probably reflects the demographic of Foursqaure more than gender participation in our grand democratic process.</p>
<p>When all is said and done, Foursquare should have some interesting data on which polling stations saw the most activity.</p>
<p><a href="/2010/politics/mayor-launches-election-day-twitter-and-311-back-incompetent-boe">Add this to the city's official Twitter tag for reporting problems at polling places</a> and there is going to be a more detailed snapshot of how the election played out at the street level than ever before.</p>
<p>bpopper [at] observer.com | <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/benpopper/">@benpopper</a></p>
<p>Crowley Talks Astronauts, Voting via Game Mechanics and Foursquare's Incredible Growth </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/uploads/4%20Square%20I%20Voted.JPG" alt="4square vote" width="330" height="257" style="float: right;margin: 5px 10px" /></p>
<p><strong>Update - Noon: 11,751 voters have checked in from 7,440 locations. Video of Crowley talking elections and astronauts below.</strong></p>
<p>Foursquare users who glance at their mobile apps this morning will notice something new: polling stations near them pushed to the top of the Places page.</p>
<p>On top of this, <a href="http://elections.foursquare.com/">Foursquare has created a special "I Voted" badge</a>, which unlocks as soon as a user checks in to a polling station.</p>
<p>Will location notifications and game mechanics help to get out the vote? It's certainly an interesting experiment. As of 9:15 a.m., more than 3,800 folks had checked in to vote at some 2,300 locations all over the country.</p>
<p>"We use game mechanics to encourage people to do things we think they'll be really excited about doing," <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_social_voting_increase_real-world_participation_foursquare_founder_says_yes.php">Foursquare founder Dennis Crowley told Read Write Web</a>. "It could be traveling to different countries or seeking out new places or new experiences. I don't think of it so much as a game. It's using the mechanics to, you know, influence behavior and try to change behavior a little. And I think that really plays into some of the stuff we're doing with the I Voted Badge.</p>
<p>The group skewed 2/1 male to female, although this probably reflects the demographic of Foursqaure more than gender participation in our grand democratic process.</p>
<p>When all is said and done, Foursquare should have some interesting data on which polling stations saw the most activity.</p>
<p><a href="/2010/politics/mayor-launches-election-day-twitter-and-311-back-incompetent-boe">Add this to the city's official Twitter tag for reporting problems at polling places</a> and there is going to be a more detailed snapshot of how the election played out at the street level than ever before.</p>
<p>bpopper [at] observer.com | <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/benpopper/">@benpopper</a></p>
<p>Crowley Talks Astronauts, Voting via Game Mechanics and Foursquare's Incredible Growth </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2010/11/can-foursquare-make-voting-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/uploads/4%20Square%20I%20Voted.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">4square vote</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
