<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Emmanuelle Riva</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/emmanuelle-riva/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>The 85th Annual Academy Awards Live Chat, Hosted by the Dog From Family Guy</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2013/02/the-85th-annual-academy-awards-live-chat-hosted-by-the-dog-from-family-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:56:46 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2013/02/the-85th-annual-academy-awards-live-chat-hosted-by-the-dog-from-family-guy/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=288970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_288971" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 408px"><a href="http://observer.com/2013/02/the-85th-annual-academy-awards-live-chat-hosted-by-the-dog-from-family-guy/85th-annual-academy-awards-arrivals/" rel="attachment wp-att-288971"><img class="size-large wp-image-288971" alt="The Best Picture category isn’t the only thing that bulked up." src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/162531352.jpg?w=398" width="398" height="600" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Best Picture category isn't the only thing that bulked up.</p></div><br />
<em>Update: Well, now we have an extra hour and a half of the red carpet! Talk amongst yourselves!</em></p>
<p>What is it about the Academy Awards? Intellectually, it's hard to muster up that much enthusiasm about who "wore it best" (Ang Lee) or how modest Katniss will be in her acceptance speech, hopefully avoiding a <em>First Wives' Club</em> reference that sounded like she was hating on Meryl Streep this time. And yet ... we still feel compelled to watch. Maybe it's because secretly, deep down, we still find it fascinating that the guy who does the voice of Stewie looks like the host of a reality game show about finding true love by having a dance-off on a stripper pole.</p>
<p>Or maybe it's because we're just suckers, who deep down believe that <em>Beasts of the Southern Wild</em> might still possibly have a chance against <em>Argo</em> or <em>Lincoln</em>.</p>
<p>Come join us, will you, on this the most magical of evenings for producers, people who are married to movie stars, and dress designers? We'll be hosting a live chat below. Just click the big countdown button and you're all set. Got it?</p>
<p>Great.<br />
<!--more--><br />
<iframe src="http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=bdaf9b76a5/height=650/width=470" height="650" width="470" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_288971" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 408px"><a href="http://observer.com/2013/02/the-85th-annual-academy-awards-live-chat-hosted-by-the-dog-from-family-guy/85th-annual-academy-awards-arrivals/" rel="attachment wp-att-288971"><img class="size-large wp-image-288971" alt="The Best Picture category isn’t the only thing that bulked up." src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/162531352.jpg?w=398" width="398" height="600" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Best Picture category isn't the only thing that bulked up.</p></div><br />
<em>Update: Well, now we have an extra hour and a half of the red carpet! Talk amongst yourselves!</em></p>
<p>What is it about the Academy Awards? Intellectually, it's hard to muster up that much enthusiasm about who "wore it best" (Ang Lee) or how modest Katniss will be in her acceptance speech, hopefully avoiding a <em>First Wives' Club</em> reference that sounded like she was hating on Meryl Streep this time. And yet ... we still feel compelled to watch. Maybe it's because secretly, deep down, we still find it fascinating that the guy who does the voice of Stewie looks like the host of a reality game show about finding true love by having a dance-off on a stripper pole.</p>
<p>Or maybe it's because we're just suckers, who deep down believe that <em>Beasts of the Southern Wild</em> might still possibly have a chance against <em>Argo</em> or <em>Lincoln</em>.</p>
<p>Come join us, will you, on this the most magical of evenings for producers, people who are married to movie stars, and dress designers? We'll be hosting a live chat below. Just click the big countdown button and you're all set. Got it?</p>
<p>Great.<br />
<!--more--><br />
<iframe src="http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=bdaf9b76a5/height=650/width=470" height="650" width="470" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2013/02/the-85th-annual-academy-awards-live-chat-hosted-by-the-dog-from-family-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/66171f102efbbabd4a08d4202ed36b91?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dgrantobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/162531352.jpg?w=398" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The Best Picture category isn’t the only thing that bulked up.</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Leo and Tigers and Ben Affleck, (Arg)O My!: Who Will Be the Sorest Loser at Tonight&#8217;s Academy Awards?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2013/02/leo-and-tigers-and-ben-affleck-argo-my-who-will-be-the-sorest-loser-at-tonights-academy-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:59:39 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2013/02/leo-and-tigers-and-ben-affleck-argo-my-who-will-be-the-sorest-loser-at-tonights-academy-awards/</link>
			<dc:creator>Drew Grant</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=288950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2013/02/leo-and-tigers-and-ben-affleck-argo-my-who-will-be-the-sorest-loser-at-tonights-academy-awards/oscar-predictions/" rel="attachment wp-att-288951"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-288951" alt="oscar predictions" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/oscar-predictions.jpg?w=600" width="522" height="204" /></a>Tonight is the 85th Academy Awards, and for all intents and purposes it should be a good one. Look at all those serious films, and the one movie by Quentin Tarantino! And with big snubs for Best Director for both <em>Argo</em> and <em>Zero Dark Thirty</em>, does that mean one of them will be be sweeping up the Best Picture Award as a consolation prize? And most importantly, is it too late to write in a ballot for Javier Bardem in <em>Skyfall</em>? Because he was <em>great</em>.</p>
<p><!--more-->This year we're making our predictions in order of the film and/or celebrity, not the award. That's because this time ... it's personal. No, seriously: between Kathryn Bigelow and Ben Affleck being iced out of Best Director, the Weinstein Bros. not having a snowball's chance in hell of scoring a big win and the fact that we're practically giving an award to Anne Hathaway just to make her stop sing-crying, there's going to be a lot of sore losers tonight. But don't worry; we're using a time-tested formula for predicting the bitter ceremonies, including taking all of the guesses on Twitter and averaging them against Nate Silver's predictions. Then we throw those out the window and  get ourselves angry over <em>Lincoln</em>’s inevitable windfall of awards that should be going to that movie that had all those great <em>New Yorker</em> articles written about it and stars a 9-year-old who wasn't even an <em>actress</em> when she started the film, which is about 50 percent more method than Daniel Day-Lewis's decision to become an Italian cobbler every time he's taking a hiatus from Hollywood.</p>
<p>So enjoy, and don't forget to tune into our live chat on the Oscars, starting at 7 p.m.!</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observer.com/2013/02/leo-and-tigers-and-ben-affleck-argo-my-who-will-be-the-sorest-loser-at-tonights-academy-awards/oscar-predictions/" rel="attachment wp-att-288951"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-288951" alt="oscar predictions" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/oscar-predictions.jpg?w=600" width="522" height="204" /></a>Tonight is the 85th Academy Awards, and for all intents and purposes it should be a good one. Look at all those serious films, and the one movie by Quentin Tarantino! And with big snubs for Best Director for both <em>Argo</em> and <em>Zero Dark Thirty</em>, does that mean one of them will be be sweeping up the Best Picture Award as a consolation prize? And most importantly, is it too late to write in a ballot for Javier Bardem in <em>Skyfall</em>? Because he was <em>great</em>.</p>
<p><!--more-->This year we're making our predictions in order of the film and/or celebrity, not the award. That's because this time ... it's personal. No, seriously: between Kathryn Bigelow and Ben Affleck being iced out of Best Director, the Weinstein Bros. not having a snowball's chance in hell of scoring a big win and the fact that we're practically giving an award to Anne Hathaway just to make her stop sing-crying, there's going to be a lot of sore losers tonight. But don't worry; we're using a time-tested formula for predicting the bitter ceremonies, including taking all of the guesses on Twitter and averaging them against Nate Silver's predictions. Then we throw those out the window and  get ourselves angry over <em>Lincoln</em>’s inevitable windfall of awards that should be going to that movie that had all those great <em>New Yorker</em> articles written about it and stars a 9-year-old who wasn't even an <em>actress</em> when she started the film, which is about 50 percent more method than Daniel Day-Lewis's decision to become an Italian cobbler every time he's taking a hiatus from Hollywood.</p>
<p>So enjoy, and don't forget to tune into our live chat on the Oscars, starting at 7 p.m.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2013/02/leo-and-tigers-and-ben-affleck-argo-my-who-will-be-the-sorest-loser-at-tonights-academy-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/66171f102efbbabd4a08d4202ed36b91?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dgrantobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/oscar-predictions.jpg?w=600" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">oscar predictions</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The Comforts of Home: Amour Boasts No Melodrama</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2012/12/the-comforts-of-home-amour-boasts-no-melodrama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:52:19 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2012/12/the-comforts-of-home-amour-boasts-no-melodrama/</link>
			<dc:creator>Rex Reed</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observer.com/?p=281189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_281190" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-281190" alt="Huppert." src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/9.jpg?w=300" width="300" height="162" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Huppert.</p></div></p>
<p>It’s always reassuring to see a nutty director go straight. Austria’s Michael Haneke is famous for his lurid, violent and thoroughly sick exercises in torture and sexual depravity. Wait a sec. Did I say famous? Only to the occasional film festival audience. The public has avoided him like a dose of swine flu. Who sat through a pair of homicidal maniacs slicing and dicing up a family in their summer vacation home on a deserted lake in <i>Funny Games, </i>a film he loved so much he made it twice? Or the sight of Isabelle Huppert in <i>La Pianiste, </i>making love to her mother before slicing off her own genitals with a razor blade? No, I’m afraid Mr. Haneke’s career has thus far existed only in the “asylum home movies” department.</p>
<p>All of that is about to change. <i>Amour </i>has set the critics drooling, this time for the right reasons. Beautifully acted, sensitively written and uncommonly refined, this delicate portrait of an elderly couple struggling with fate, mortality and immortal devotion breathes clarity and passion into the verboten subject of old age without the usual attendant sentimental soap opera clichés. This is due, in a large part, to the vibrant talents of two beloved veterans of classic French cinema—Jean-Louis Trintignant (memorable in Bertolucci’s <i>The Conformist</i>,among others) and the incandescent Emmanuelle Riva (of Resnais’s <i>Hiroshima, mon amour</i>)<i>. </i>Probably neither of them ever thought they would live to see the day when their hair was gone and the apple wouldn’t bite. I’m so glad they hung in there. They’re worth waiting for.</p>
<p>They play Anne and Georges, a pair of octogenarian musicians who have been married for decades, their careers largely behind them but their future together in old age cloudless and optimistic. One night, they return home from a concert to find their apartment robbed and their privacy invaded. Anne is so unnerved by the intrusion that the next morning she suffers a small stroke that turns out to be the beginning of a physical and mental decline. Paralyzed and confined to a wheelchair, she succumbs to her illness while Georges attempts to care for her at home. Each day presents a new challenge, as they deal with the evolution of senior surrender—immobility, dementia, incontinence. But no matter what cards they are dealt by the devils who nurse our universe, they cling to a love that might even resist death. The daily events in their lives are dramatized indirectly, not in bold strokes. The details of everything that defines them—from the furnishings that make their apartment as familiar as an old sweater to their passive relationship with their daughter (Haneke alumna Isabelle Huppert, in a guest appearance without razor blades)—carry out the director’s theme: that life is not about the big issues, but the sum total of the little things, like what we saved in the attic and the brand of cereal we ate for breakfast. The scenes, like the performances, are meted out quietly, in small, languid sips. Mr. Haneke’s screenplay, like his controlled direction, is lucid, without obvious overstatement. The performances are a miracle, as much about the aging of the two stars as the characters they play. Ms. Riva and Mr. Trintignant are fearless, hiding nothing from the camera. It’s a triumph of subtlety one doesn’t often see within today’s fast pace. As Anne slips sadly away, her private world turns intimate and remote. But love remains, even in the final resolution.</p>
<p>Old age affects us all, but at the movies it’s a subject that defies commercial success. So I have doubts about the box office future of <i>Amour</i>, but no reservations about its compassion and artistry. Even if it moves you to tears, the intelligence and humanity you will experience are worth the emotional stress. That doesn’t mean I want to see a lot of films about Alzheimer’s or that I will even like Michael Haneke’s next film. But don’t let <i>Amour </i>join the legion of “Best Films You Never Saw.” I urge you to share its sweetness and wisdom, and learn something.</p>
<p align="right"><i>rreed@observer.com</i></p>
<p>AMOUR</p>
<p>Running Time 127 minutes</p>
<p>Written and Directed by Michael Haneke</p>
<p>Starring Jean-Louis Trintignant, Emmanuelle Riva and Isabelle Huppert</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_281190" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-281190" alt="Huppert." src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/9.jpg?w=300" width="300" height="162" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Huppert.</p></div></p>
<p>It’s always reassuring to see a nutty director go straight. Austria’s Michael Haneke is famous for his lurid, violent and thoroughly sick exercises in torture and sexual depravity. Wait a sec. Did I say famous? Only to the occasional film festival audience. The public has avoided him like a dose of swine flu. Who sat through a pair of homicidal maniacs slicing and dicing up a family in their summer vacation home on a deserted lake in <i>Funny Games, </i>a film he loved so much he made it twice? Or the sight of Isabelle Huppert in <i>La Pianiste, </i>making love to her mother before slicing off her own genitals with a razor blade? No, I’m afraid Mr. Haneke’s career has thus far existed only in the “asylum home movies” department.</p>
<p>All of that is about to change. <i>Amour </i>has set the critics drooling, this time for the right reasons. Beautifully acted, sensitively written and uncommonly refined, this delicate portrait of an elderly couple struggling with fate, mortality and immortal devotion breathes clarity and passion into the verboten subject of old age without the usual attendant sentimental soap opera clichés. This is due, in a large part, to the vibrant talents of two beloved veterans of classic French cinema—Jean-Louis Trintignant (memorable in Bertolucci’s <i>The Conformist</i>,among others) and the incandescent Emmanuelle Riva (of Resnais’s <i>Hiroshima, mon amour</i>)<i>. </i>Probably neither of them ever thought they would live to see the day when their hair was gone and the apple wouldn’t bite. I’m so glad they hung in there. They’re worth waiting for.</p>
<p>They play Anne and Georges, a pair of octogenarian musicians who have been married for decades, their careers largely behind them but their future together in old age cloudless and optimistic. One night, they return home from a concert to find their apartment robbed and their privacy invaded. Anne is so unnerved by the intrusion that the next morning she suffers a small stroke that turns out to be the beginning of a physical and mental decline. Paralyzed and confined to a wheelchair, she succumbs to her illness while Georges attempts to care for her at home. Each day presents a new challenge, as they deal with the evolution of senior surrender—immobility, dementia, incontinence. But no matter what cards they are dealt by the devils who nurse our universe, they cling to a love that might even resist death. The daily events in their lives are dramatized indirectly, not in bold strokes. The details of everything that defines them—from the furnishings that make their apartment as familiar as an old sweater to their passive relationship with their daughter (Haneke alumna Isabelle Huppert, in a guest appearance without razor blades)—carry out the director’s theme: that life is not about the big issues, but the sum total of the little things, like what we saved in the attic and the brand of cereal we ate for breakfast. The scenes, like the performances, are meted out quietly, in small, languid sips. Mr. Haneke’s screenplay, like his controlled direction, is lucid, without obvious overstatement. The performances are a miracle, as much about the aging of the two stars as the characters they play. Ms. Riva and Mr. Trintignant are fearless, hiding nothing from the camera. It’s a triumph of subtlety one doesn’t often see within today’s fast pace. As Anne slips sadly away, her private world turns intimate and remote. But love remains, even in the final resolution.</p>
<p>Old age affects us all, but at the movies it’s a subject that defies commercial success. So I have doubts about the box office future of <i>Amour</i>, but no reservations about its compassion and artistry. Even if it moves you to tears, the intelligence and humanity you will experience are worth the emotional stress. That doesn’t mean I want to see a lot of films about Alzheimer’s or that I will even like Michael Haneke’s next film. But don’t let <i>Amour </i>join the legion of “Best Films You Never Saw.” I urge you to share its sweetness and wisdom, and learn something.</p>
<p align="right"><i>rreed@observer.com</i></p>
<p>AMOUR</p>
<p>Running Time 127 minutes</p>
<p>Written and Directed by Michael Haneke</p>
<p>Starring Jean-Louis Trintignant, Emmanuelle Riva and Isabelle Huppert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2012/12/the-comforts-of-home-amour-boasts-no-melodrama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e4d240ca4e5c5c4ff5cf2c9ef32616ef?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">rreed</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/9.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Huppert.</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>The Underappreciated Giant of the French New Wave</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2009/04/the-underappreciated-giant-of-the-french-new-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:00:38 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2009/04/the-underappreciated-giant-of-the-french-new-wave/</link>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Sarris</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2009/04/the-underappreciated-giant-of-the-french-new-wave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/leon_morin_pretre.jpg?w=300&h=200" />Jean-Pierre Melville&rsquo;s (1933-1973) <em>L&eacute;on Morin, Pr&ecirc;tre</em> (L&eacute;on Morin, priest) (1961), from his own screenplay, based on B&eacute;atrix&rsquo; Beck&rsquo;s (1914-2008) autobiographical novel, will be revived at Film Forum from April 17 to April 23. Both the book and the film are constructed as a dialectical confrontation between a skeptical communist woman and an intellectual Catholic priest, with Emmanuelle Riva as the woman, and Jean-Paul Belmondo as the priest. Riva had just created a sensation in Alain Resnais&rsquo; <em>Hiroshima Mon Amour</em> (1959), and Belmondo had just leaped to stardom in Jean-Luc Godard&rsquo;s <em>Breathless</em> (1960), in which Melville himself had played a cameo part as a Rumanian poet interviewed at the Paris airport by Jean Seberg.</p>
<p>The setting of the film is a small French provincial town during and after the German Occupation. Henri Decae provided the ritualized cinematography in a series of short uninflected vignettes centered on a spiritual duel between a nonbeliever and a true believer. It further establishes Melville as the last to be discovered and appreciated giant of the French New Wave of the &rsquo;50s and &rsquo;60s.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/leon_morin_pretre.jpg?w=300&h=200" />Jean-Pierre Melville&rsquo;s (1933-1973) <em>L&eacute;on Morin, Pr&ecirc;tre</em> (L&eacute;on Morin, priest) (1961), from his own screenplay, based on B&eacute;atrix&rsquo; Beck&rsquo;s (1914-2008) autobiographical novel, will be revived at Film Forum from April 17 to April 23. Both the book and the film are constructed as a dialectical confrontation between a skeptical communist woman and an intellectual Catholic priest, with Emmanuelle Riva as the woman, and Jean-Paul Belmondo as the priest. Riva had just created a sensation in Alain Resnais&rsquo; <em>Hiroshima Mon Amour</em> (1959), and Belmondo had just leaped to stardom in Jean-Luc Godard&rsquo;s <em>Breathless</em> (1960), in which Melville himself had played a cameo part as a Rumanian poet interviewed at the Paris airport by Jean Seberg.</p>
<p>The setting of the film is a small French provincial town during and after the German Occupation. Henri Decae provided the ritualized cinematography in a series of short uninflected vignettes centered on a spiritual duel between a nonbeliever and a true believer. It further establishes Melville as the last to be discovered and appreciated giant of the French New Wave of the &rsquo;50s and &rsquo;60s.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2009/04/the-underappreciated-giant-of-the-french-new-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/leon_morin_pretre.jpg?w=300&#38;h=200" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
