<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observer &#187; Fox Business Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observer.com/term/fox-business-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='observer.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://observer.com/osd.xml" title="Observer" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://observer.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Broke As A Peacock!</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/11/broke-as-a-peacock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:45:06 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/11/broke-as-a-peacock/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/11/broke-as-a-peacock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/zucker.jpg?w=199&h=300" />In recent months, bad news in the financial world has translated into big news for CNBC, and big news is good news for a 24-hour cable news network. With national interest in financial news at a fever pitch, the business news network has been posting its highest ratings in its 19-year history.</p>
<p class="text">And now, owner GE is rewarding them with … budget cuts!
<p class="text">Bosses at CNBC, <em>The Observer </em>has learned, are now preparing to scale back budgets. Sources inside CNBC have heard that the figure could approach a 10 percent overall budget cut.</p>
<p class="text">“We’re committed to having the best team in business news worldwide,” said CNBC spokesman Kevin Goldman. </p>
<p class="text">In recent years, NBC’s shift from the analog to the digital era has resulted in a range of money-saving maneuvers, particularly at MSNBC and NBC News. </p>
<p class="text">But until now CNBC has largely avoided the machete. Last year, for instance, the cable business channel was reportedly exempted from the cuts thanks to the nascent competition from the newly launched Fox Business Network. </p>
<p class="text">Over the past year, CNBC has enjoyed steady ratings dominance over their competitors at Fox Business. But the downside of CNBC’s competitive success is that it has apparently brought their budget back into play. The move doesn’t surprise many longtime observers of the NBC landscape. “It’s only logical that after cut after cut at NBC News and MSNBC that CNBC would eventually have to come to the table,” said one TV insider. </p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt">Back in October, NBC Universal chief Jeff Zucker sent an e-mail to employees, informing them that roughly $500 million, or roughly 3 percent of the budget, would be cut across the company, focusing on “reductions in promotion expenses; in discretionary spending, such as travel and entertainment and outside consultants; and in staffing costs.”</span></p>
<p class="text">Whether “staffing costs” are among those that will have to be implemented at CNBC remains to be seen.</p>
<p class="text">Meanwhile, serious changes are rumored to be afoot for NBC News’ investigative unit led by senior correspondent Lisa Myers and senior producer Jim Popkin. </p>
<p class="text">The unit is based in Washington,  D.C. On Friday, Nov. 7, TVNewser reported that Washington bureau chief Mark Whitaker was encouraging D.C. staffers to take buyout offers, which, according to their source, had been offered to “virtually everyone” in the bureau. </p>
<p class="text">Will the buyouts affect the investigative team moving forward? </p>
<p class="text">“Our commitment to investigative journalism remains as strong as ever,” NBC News spokesperson Allison Gollust said. “We aren’t looking to make any changes there. We’re not planning to make any changes to personnel.”</p>
<p style="text-align: left" class="emailtagline" align="left"><em>fgillette@observer.com</em> </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/zucker.jpg?w=199&h=300" />In recent months, bad news in the financial world has translated into big news for CNBC, and big news is good news for a 24-hour cable news network. With national interest in financial news at a fever pitch, the business news network has been posting its highest ratings in its 19-year history.</p>
<p class="text">And now, owner GE is rewarding them with … budget cuts!
<p class="text">Bosses at CNBC, <em>The Observer </em>has learned, are now preparing to scale back budgets. Sources inside CNBC have heard that the figure could approach a 10 percent overall budget cut.</p>
<p class="text">“We’re committed to having the best team in business news worldwide,” said CNBC spokesman Kevin Goldman. </p>
<p class="text">In recent years, NBC’s shift from the analog to the digital era has resulted in a range of money-saving maneuvers, particularly at MSNBC and NBC News. </p>
<p class="text">But until now CNBC has largely avoided the machete. Last year, for instance, the cable business channel was reportedly exempted from the cuts thanks to the nascent competition from the newly launched Fox Business Network. </p>
<p class="text">Over the past year, CNBC has enjoyed steady ratings dominance over their competitors at Fox Business. But the downside of CNBC’s competitive success is that it has apparently brought their budget back into play. The move doesn’t surprise many longtime observers of the NBC landscape. “It’s only logical that after cut after cut at NBC News and MSNBC that CNBC would eventually have to come to the table,” said one TV insider. </p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt">Back in October, NBC Universal chief Jeff Zucker sent an e-mail to employees, informing them that roughly $500 million, or roughly 3 percent of the budget, would be cut across the company, focusing on “reductions in promotion expenses; in discretionary spending, such as travel and entertainment and outside consultants; and in staffing costs.”</span></p>
<p class="text">Whether “staffing costs” are among those that will have to be implemented at CNBC remains to be seen.</p>
<p class="text">Meanwhile, serious changes are rumored to be afoot for NBC News’ investigative unit led by senior correspondent Lisa Myers and senior producer Jim Popkin. </p>
<p class="text">The unit is based in Washington,  D.C. On Friday, Nov. 7, TVNewser reported that Washington bureau chief Mark Whitaker was encouraging D.C. staffers to take buyout offers, which, according to their source, had been offered to “virtually everyone” in the bureau. </p>
<p class="text">Will the buyouts affect the investigative team moving forward? </p>
<p class="text">“Our commitment to investigative journalism remains as strong as ever,” NBC News spokesperson Allison Gollust said. “We aren’t looking to make any changes there. We’re not planning to make any changes to personnel.”</p>
<p style="text-align: left" class="emailtagline" align="left"><em>fgillette@observer.com</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/11/broke-as-a-peacock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/zucker.jpg?w=199&#38;h=300" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Move Over, Cody! Eric Bolling Joins FBN&#8217;s Happy Hour as Co-Host</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/11/move-over-cody-eric-bolling-joins-fbns-ihappy-houri-as-cohost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:10:40 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/11/move-over-cody-eric-bolling-joins-fbns-ihappy-houri-as-cohost/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/11/move-over-cody-eric-bolling-joins-fbns-ihappy-houri-as-cohost/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bolling111008.jpg" />Executives at the Fox Business Network announced today that <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/our-team/personalities/eric-bolling">Eric Bolling</a> will be joining <a href="http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/">Cody Willard</a> and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,97378,00.html%22">Rebecca Diamond</a> as the co-host of <em>Happy Hour</em>—FBN's breezy, after work business-lite show, set in the Bull &amp; Bear bar at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel. </p>
<p>&quot;<em>Happy Hour</em> is a dynamic show that takes the headlines and market reactions and turns them into useful and intelligent information,&quot; said Mr. Bolling in a press release. &quot;I am excited to take on this new role as co-host.&quot;</p>
<p>Presumably, Mr. Bolling will also be excited to interview the wide range of business leaders who appear on the show. Past guests have <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/10/fox_business_networks_happy_ho.html">included</a> skateboarding legend Tony Hawk and porn star Savannah Samson.</p>
<p>Last time we wrote about Mr. Bolling, a high-rolling commodities trader-turned-charismatic talking head, he was battling in court to get out of his contract with CNBC and, um, sending emails to the <a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/catch-catch-predator">wrong Kevin</a> (see second item). </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bolling111008.jpg" />Executives at the Fox Business Network announced today that <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/our-team/personalities/eric-bolling">Eric Bolling</a> will be joining <a href="http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/">Cody Willard</a> and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,97378,00.html%22">Rebecca Diamond</a> as the co-host of <em>Happy Hour</em>—FBN's breezy, after work business-lite show, set in the Bull &amp; Bear bar at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel. </p>
<p>&quot;<em>Happy Hour</em> is a dynamic show that takes the headlines and market reactions and turns them into useful and intelligent information,&quot; said Mr. Bolling in a press release. &quot;I am excited to take on this new role as co-host.&quot;</p>
<p>Presumably, Mr. Bolling will also be excited to interview the wide range of business leaders who appear on the show. Past guests have <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/10/fox_business_networks_happy_ho.html">included</a> skateboarding legend Tony Hawk and porn star Savannah Samson.</p>
<p>Last time we wrote about Mr. Bolling, a high-rolling commodities trader-turned-charismatic talking head, he was battling in court to get out of his contract with CNBC and, um, sending emails to the <a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/catch-catch-predator">wrong Kevin</a> (see second item). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/11/move-over-cody-eric-bolling-joins-fbns-ihappy-houri-as-cohost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/bolling111008.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Fox Business Network Targets CNBC&#8217;s Jim Cramer in Financial Crisis Ads</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/10/fox-business-network-targets-cnbcs-jim-cramer-in-financial-crisis-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:41:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/10/fox-business-network-targets-cnbcs-jim-cramer-in-financial-crisis-ads/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/10/fox-business-network-targets-cnbcs-jim-cramer-in-financial-crisis-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to recent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/business/media/03fox.html">articles</a>, the Fox Business Network (FBN) still lags far, far behind its competitors at CNBC in terms of the size of its audience.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>But amid the current financial panic, FBN is hoping to win over some viewers by running a political-style attack-ad knocking the record of CNBC's Jim Cramer. </p>
<p>&quot;Financially, these are crazy times,&quot; warns a scary voiceover in the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yca7nbhyMVY">ads</a>. &quot;The last thing you need is bad advice. The last thing you need is CNBC's Jim Cramer.&quot; </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to recent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/business/media/03fox.html">articles</a>, the Fox Business Network (FBN) still lags far, far behind its competitors at CNBC in terms of the size of its audience.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>But amid the current financial panic, FBN is hoping to win over some viewers by running a political-style attack-ad knocking the record of CNBC's Jim Cramer. </p>
<p>&quot;Financially, these are crazy times,&quot; warns a scary voiceover in the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yca7nbhyMVY">ads</a>. &quot;The last thing you need is bad advice. The last thing you need is CNBC's Jim Cramer.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/10/fox-business-network-targets-cnbcs-jim-cramer-in-financial-crisis-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Report: Fox Business Network Averaging Just 8,000 Daytime Viewers; 20,000 Prime Time</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/07/report-fox-business-network-averaging-just-8000-daytime-viewers-20000-prime-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:32:55 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/07/report-fox-business-network-averaging-just-8000-daytime-viewers-20000-prime-time/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/07/report-fox-business-network-averaging-just-8000-daytime-viewers-20000-prime-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/fbn.jpg?w=300&h=163" />On Saturday, <em>The Washington Post</em>'s Howard Kurtz got his hands on a new set of Nielsen numbers for the Fox Business Network. How's Rupert Murdoch's fledgling cable business-news network doing? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/25/AR2008072502843.html">According</a> to Mr. Kurtz the numbers to date remain far behind competitor CNBC. </p>
<p>&quot;Fox News executives knew it would be a long, uphill battle to challenge CNBC when they launched a new business channel last October -- and new ratings confirm that they are right,&quot; writes Mr. Kurtz. </p>
<p>More from the article: </p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>For the first three weeks of July, according to Nielsen figures obtained yesterday that have not been publicly released, Fox Business Network is averaging just 8,000 viewers during daytime hours, and 20,000 in prime time. </p>
<p>CNBC, by contrast, is drawing an average of 284,000 viewers during the day and 191,000 in prime time. </p>
</div>
<p>      So, what's the next move, Rupert?</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/fbn.jpg?w=300&h=163" />On Saturday, <em>The Washington Post</em>'s Howard Kurtz got his hands on a new set of Nielsen numbers for the Fox Business Network. How's Rupert Murdoch's fledgling cable business-news network doing? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/25/AR2008072502843.html">According</a> to Mr. Kurtz the numbers to date remain far behind competitor CNBC. </p>
<p>&quot;Fox News executives knew it would be a long, uphill battle to challenge CNBC when they launched a new business channel last October -- and new ratings confirm that they are right,&quot; writes Mr. Kurtz. </p>
<p>More from the article: </p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>For the first three weeks of July, according to Nielsen figures obtained yesterday that have not been publicly released, Fox Business Network is averaging just 8,000 viewers during daytime hours, and 20,000 in prime time. </p>
<p>CNBC, by contrast, is drawing an average of 284,000 viewers during the day and 191,000 in prime time. </p>
</div>
<p>      So, what's the next move, Rupert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/07/report-fox-business-network-averaging-just-8000-daytime-viewers-20000-prime-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/fbn.jpg?w=300&#38;h=163" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>WSJ&#039;s Walt Mossberg Joins Fox Business Network; The Inexorable Roll Continues?</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/07/wsjs-walt-mossberg-joins-fox-business-network-the-inexorable-roll-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:22:42 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/07/wsjs-walt-mossberg-joins-fox-business-network-the-inexorable-roll-continues/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/07/wsjs-walt-mossberg-joins-fox-business-network-the-inexorable-roll-continues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/waltmossberg.jpg?w=300&h=150" />Brian Stelter <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/business/media/09fox.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">reports in</a> <em>The Times</em> today that <em>The Journal's</em> personal tech columnist Walt Mossberg will join up with the Fox Business Network as a contributor.</p>
<p>But the whole deal is a tricky one. <em>The Journal</em> still has an agreement with CNBC that runs through 2012, and it's a contract that might prevent <em>Journal</em>ists from appearing too regularly on FBN. </p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>A 15-year contract that extends until 2012 between CNBC, the dominant business channel, and The Journal prevents many reporters from appearing on Fox Business programs. The News Corporation has not tried to unwind itself from the contract, at least not publicly. But the scope of the agreement is limited, and as the announcement about Mr. Mossberg illustrates, Fox is finding ways to chisel away at it. </p>
<p>“As long as we stay away from branded, regularly scheduled segments of business news, we’re safe,” Kevin Magee, an executive vice president at Fox News, said in an interview. “Breaking news is fine and nonbusiness news is fine.”</p>
</div>
<p>So how many more of those breaking news and nonbusiness news people can they pluck away?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/waltmossberg.jpg?w=300&h=150" />Brian Stelter <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/business/media/09fox.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">reports in</a> <em>The Times</em> today that <em>The Journal's</em> personal tech columnist Walt Mossberg will join up with the Fox Business Network as a contributor.</p>
<p>But the whole deal is a tricky one. <em>The Journal</em> still has an agreement with CNBC that runs through 2012, and it's a contract that might prevent <em>Journal</em>ists from appearing too regularly on FBN. </p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>A 15-year contract that extends until 2012 between CNBC, the dominant business channel, and The Journal prevents many reporters from appearing on Fox Business programs. The News Corporation has not tried to unwind itself from the contract, at least not publicly. But the scope of the agreement is limited, and as the announcement about Mr. Mossberg illustrates, Fox is finding ways to chisel away at it. </p>
<p>“As long as we stay away from branded, regularly scheduled segments of business news, we’re safe,” Kevin Magee, an executive vice president at Fox News, said in an interview. “Breaking news is fine and nonbusiness news is fine.”</p>
</div>
<p>So how many more of those breaking news and nonbusiness news people can they pluck away?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/07/wsjs-walt-mossberg-joins-fox-business-network-the-inexorable-roll-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/waltmossberg.jpg?w=300&#38;h=150" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Murdoch on Fox: He&#039;s &#039;Very Friendly&#039; with Hillary, and He Wants to Change Culture of the Journal</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2008/02/murdoch-on-fox-hes-very-friendly-with-hillary-and-he-wants-to-change-culture-of-the-ijournali/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:17:39 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2008/02/murdoch-on-fox-hes-very-friendly-with-hillary-and-he-wants-to-change-culture-of-the-ijournali/</link>
			<dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2008/02/murdoch-on-fox-hes-very-friendly-with-hillary-and-he-wants-to-change-culture-of-the-ijournali/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rupertmurdochrobertthomson_2.jpg?w=300&h=181" />Rupert Murdoch was on Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto this afternoon and discussed how he had &quot;no ill-will&quot; against Hillary Clinton and how he planned to change the culture of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> (in part, by moving their offices to Midtown). &quot;I think, when you take over a company and you want to make changes, it is good to do everything you can to change the culture. And a physical move is a big and useful thing to do,&quot; said Mr. Murdoch.</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>    CAVUTO:  Besides the good numbers that you registered here, Mr. Murdoch, everybody was abuzz when <em>The New York Post</em>, your -- your signature paper in the United States, besides<em> The Wall Street Journal</em>, had endorsed Barack Obama. What was behind that?  Some are insinuating that maybe ill will with Hillary Clinton.  What? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  No.  There is no ill will with Senator Clinton at all. And, in fact, we have a very friendly relationship. But I think the editorial board there and the editors felt that Obama was a real chance for something new, and we didn't agree with a lot of Mrs. Clinton's national policies, although we did think she had been a very good senator in New York State. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  All right.  So, this had nothing to do with the fact that Hillary Clinton -- I am not saying kowtowed, but did not make it a point to seek out the <em>Post </em>editorial board to explain her positions or any of this that has been rumored, none of that? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  None in the least, no. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  And she is quite available to our editorial board.</p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  She's made that quite clear. </p>
<p> . . .</p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. On to T<em>he Wall Street Journal</em> and how that is moving along. There had been talk, as well, that a lot of the editorial, the reporters, the like, are coming to be coming to midtown Manhattan from downtown Manhattan.  A, is that true?  And, B, what are you going to do with them when they do get uptown?</p>
<p>    (LAUGHTER)</p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  No, but we would like to do that.  We have not worked it out fully yet. I think, when you take over a company and you want to make changes, it is good to do everything you can to change the culture.  And a physical move is a big and useful thing to do. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  Is that to say, Mr. Murdoch, a physical move for everyone or just the lion's share of the editorial staff?  Who?  What?</p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  Oh, it would be for everybody. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  Oh, really?  OK.  So, whatever operations they have downtown, there won't be? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  We would move up.  That's the -- that's the plan, or that's the hope. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK.  And by when do you want to do this? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  I think it would take a year. </p>
<p>. . . . </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. Any other changes afoot?  There had been talk that you wanted to make The Wall Street Journal online subscription service a free service.  I know you are going to give a lot more of it away, but it won't entirely be free. What is the latest on that? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  That's right. We are going to widen what we do now for free, go for a bigger audience and more advertising. But, equally, the real analysis and the depth of the WSJ.com will be developed and probably have its prices increased over time. That's where the value is to the professionals all over the world. We see, actually, the electronic and online possibilities of Dow Jones as being the most exciting part of the business. </p>
</div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rupertmurdochrobertthomson_2.jpg?w=300&h=181" />Rupert Murdoch was on Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto this afternoon and discussed how he had &quot;no ill-will&quot; against Hillary Clinton and how he planned to change the culture of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> (in part, by moving their offices to Midtown). &quot;I think, when you take over a company and you want to make changes, it is good to do everything you can to change the culture. And a physical move is a big and useful thing to do,&quot; said Mr. Murdoch.</p>
<div class="oldbq">
<p>    CAVUTO:  Besides the good numbers that you registered here, Mr. Murdoch, everybody was abuzz when <em>The New York Post</em>, your -- your signature paper in the United States, besides<em> The Wall Street Journal</em>, had endorsed Barack Obama. What was behind that?  Some are insinuating that maybe ill will with Hillary Clinton.  What? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  No.  There is no ill will with Senator Clinton at all. And, in fact, we have a very friendly relationship. But I think the editorial board there and the editors felt that Obama was a real chance for something new, and we didn't agree with a lot of Mrs. Clinton's national policies, although we did think she had been a very good senator in New York State. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  All right.  So, this had nothing to do with the fact that Hillary Clinton -- I am not saying kowtowed, but did not make it a point to seek out the <em>Post </em>editorial board to explain her positions or any of this that has been rumored, none of that? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  None in the least, no. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  And she is quite available to our editorial board.</p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  She's made that quite clear. </p>
<p> . . .</p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. On to T<em>he Wall Street Journal</em> and how that is moving along. There had been talk, as well, that a lot of the editorial, the reporters, the like, are coming to be coming to midtown Manhattan from downtown Manhattan.  A, is that true?  And, B, what are you going to do with them when they do get uptown?</p>
<p>    (LAUGHTER)</p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  No, but we would like to do that.  We have not worked it out fully yet. I think, when you take over a company and you want to make changes, it is good to do everything you can to change the culture.  And a physical move is a big and useful thing to do. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  Is that to say, Mr. Murdoch, a physical move for everyone or just the lion's share of the editorial staff?  Who?  What?</p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  Oh, it would be for everybody. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  Oh, really?  OK.  So, whatever operations they have downtown, there won't be? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  We would move up.  That's the -- that's the plan, or that's the hope. </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK.  And by when do you want to do this? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  I think it would take a year. </p>
<p>. . . . </p>
<p>    CAVUTO:  OK. Any other changes afoot?  There had been talk that you wanted to make The Wall Street Journal online subscription service a free service.  I know you are going to give a lot more of it away, but it won't entirely be free. What is the latest on that? </p>
<p>    MURDOCH:  That's right. We are going to widen what we do now for free, go for a bigger audience and more advertising. But, equally, the real analysis and the depth of the WSJ.com will be developed and probably have its prices increased over time. That's where the value is to the professionals all over the world. We see, actually, the electronic and online possibilities of Dow Jones as being the most exciting part of the business. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2008/02/murdoch-on-fox-hes-very-friendly-with-hillary-and-he-wants-to-change-culture-of-the-ijournali/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rupertmurdochrobertthomson_2.jpg?w=300&#38;h=181" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Murdoch Sizes up FBN</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/12/murdoch-sizes-up-fbn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:19:30 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/12/murdoch-sizes-up-fbn/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/12/murdoch-sizes-up-fbn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rogerailes.jpg?w=300&h=165" />More from <a href="/2007/murdoch-we-are-long-way-front-new-york-times">Rupert Murdoch's sitdown </a>yesterday with Fox's Neal Cavuto: Mr. Murdoch also discussed how important <em>The</em> <em>Journal</em> would be to building up the recently launched Fox Business Network.
<p><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal">&quot;</span></strong>Oh, I think they'll build each other, they'll help each other,&quot; he said. &quot;You know, at the moment, there's a standing agreement with our competition, but that will run down or run out and we'll be able to put the two together more and more.&quot;</span></span></p>
<p>Mr. Murdoch was referring to <em>The</em> <em>Journal</em>'s content-sharing partnership with rival CNBC, which--barring some major renegotiating or legal wrangling--won't run out until 2012.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">In the meantime, Mr. Murdoch said the new channel was &quot;going well.&quot; </span></span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">&quot;I don't know Roger's -- Roger Ailes' -- latest projections,&quot; said he said. &quot;But it's going to be three or four years to get the distribution that it took us seven years to get with FOX News.&quot;</span></span> </p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rogerailes.jpg?w=300&h=165" />More from <a href="/2007/murdoch-we-are-long-way-front-new-york-times">Rupert Murdoch's sitdown </a>yesterday with Fox's Neal Cavuto: Mr. Murdoch also discussed how important <em>The</em> <em>Journal</em> would be to building up the recently launched Fox Business Network.
<p><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal">&quot;</span></strong>Oh, I think they'll build each other, they'll help each other,&quot; he said. &quot;You know, at the moment, there's a standing agreement with our competition, but that will run down or run out and we'll be able to put the two together more and more.&quot;</span></span></p>
<p>Mr. Murdoch was referring to <em>The</em> <em>Journal</em>'s content-sharing partnership with rival CNBC, which--barring some major renegotiating or legal wrangling--won't run out until 2012.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">In the meantime, Mr. Murdoch said the new channel was &quot;going well.&quot; </span></span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">&quot;I don't know Roger's -- Roger Ailes' -- latest projections,&quot; said he said. &quot;But it's going to be three or four years to get the distribution that it took us seven years to get with FOX News.&quot;</span></span> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/12/murdoch-sizes-up-fbn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rogerailes.jpg?w=300&#38;h=165" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>At the FBN Launch Party—Fox Anchor: &#8220;We&#8217;re Trying to Take Over the World&#8221;</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/10/at-the-fbn-launch-partyfox-anchor-were-trying-to-take-over-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:47:50 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/10/at-the-fbn-launch-partyfox-anchor-were-trying-to-take-over-the-world/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/10/at-the-fbn-launch-partyfox-anchor-were-trying-to-take-over-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/102507_gillette.jpg?w=300&h=161" />On Wednesday night, a little after 7 pm, deep in the labyrinth that is the Metropolitan Museum of Art, past the line of photographers in the lobby, past the medieval statues of the Virgin Mary, past a mummy or two, and past a temporary installation that spelled out &quot;Fox Business&quot; in big block letters made, ostensibly, of green shrubbery, Regis Philbin gave Roger Ailes a hug.
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;This guy is famous in Ohio,&quot; said Mr. Philbin, oddly. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">NYTV moved in and shook hands. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Ailes asked good-naturedly if NYTV had written anything critical of Fox or Mr. Philbin, recently. Mr. Philbin fielded the question. &quot;He writes something critical of me,&quot; said Mr. Philbin, &quot;at least once a month.&quot; An exaggeration!</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Everyone smiled.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">We were there to celebrate the launch of Rupert Murdoch's latest media venture—the Fox Business Network.</span><span style="font-size: 8pt">  And so, a few feet away, alongside a makeshift bar, Mel Brooks was struggling to get Mr. Murdoch's attention. He had taken a bad angle. Only Mr. Murdoch's back was available. Mr. Brooks waited patiently. At last, the Media Mogul from Down Under shifted positions. Mr. Brooks moved in and put his hand around the back of Mr. Murdoch's head. &quot;Congratulations,&quot; said Mr. Brooks. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">He wasnt alone. In the large space surrounding the Temple of Dendur, (lit up festively in orange and blue lights for the occasion) a crowd of media, television, and business elites slurped down drinks, and formed a congratulatory conga line, leading up to Mr. Murdoch near the bar. <span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Nearby, Harvey Weinstein eyed the room. Oscar De La Renta kissed a woman on her cheek. New Fox star Alexis Glick circulated, shaking hands. Lloyd Grove hovered. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> Half an hour later, Mr. Ailes, sporting a dark suit and a red tie with white slanted stripes, took the stage. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;Some of you are wondering why we are in the Temple  of Dendur,&quot; said Mr. Ailes. &quot;So am I. Actually the temple was built in 15 BC by Emperor Augustus of Rome, sort of the Rupert Murdoch of his day. I said to Rupert, we're having an opening party at the Temple of Dendur. He said, Good I like that place. Is it for sale?&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">The crowd chuckled. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;Rupert Murdoch is so casual.  One day he said to me, you know CNBC needs competition,&quot; recalled Mr. Ailes. &quot;I said, uh oh, here we go. Because I was around when he said CNN needed some competition. And I was around when he said, I really like <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, it's a great paper. So if you're ever around Rupert and you hear these kind of casual comments, pretend you don't hear them because otherwise you're going to be working very hard.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Ailes then ceded the spotlight to Mr. Murdoch, calling him the &quot;greatest media visionary of all time.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Murdoch, dressed in a pin striped suit, and a dark necktie with white dots, stepped to the podium. &quot;It's been a brilliant first nine days,&quot; said Mr. Murdoch. &quot;It's been distinctive, it's been informative, it's been noisy. It's business news that grabs your attention and keeps it, whether you're a CEO or a small business owner. That's the brilliance of Roger Ailes.&quot;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Murdoch spoke optimistically of the &quot;triumphs of the free markets&quot; on a global scale.&quot;“In this country we have the best-run, the most corruption-free companies in the world,&quot; he said. &quot;Our companies have the kind of success and variety that the rest of the world looks to. Not that you would know that from much of the business coverage we see every day.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">He said that the Fox Business Network would cover the &quot;scandals and failures,&quot; that would come along now and then and would be &quot;just as tough as anyone protecting investors.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;But my hope for Fox Business is that it will also find time to celebrate the freedom and sense of optimism and daring that free markets have given Americans.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">The crowd applauded, and the party continued. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Around 8:30 or so, the Counting Crows took the stage. As they wailed through their first song, NYTV chatted with Cody Willard and Rebecca Gomez, hosts of Fox Business Network's evening talk show, <em>Happy Hour</em>, set in the Bull and Bear bar at the Waldorf </span><span style="font-size: 8pt">Astoria</span><span style="font-size: 8pt">.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">The Counting Crows weren't the shaggy-haired Mr. Willard's scene. <span> </span>Instead, he launched into a story about seeing Kiss in concert.<span>  </span>Twice, said Mr. Willard, he had dressed up as Gene Simmons for Halloween.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">He said he was having a great time at the party.<span>  </span>&quot;I love the fact that you see a huge sign for Fox Business in front of the Egyptian temple. That puts some perspective on what the vision is, right? You have the greatest empire of all time, the Egyptian empire…&quot; He paused. &quot;What's the name of this place?&quot;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-size: 8pt">Um, the Temple  of Dendur. </span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Willard continued, unfazed. &quot;That's what the vision is here,&quot; said Mr. Willard. &quot;We're trying to take over the world.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> He leaned back and smiled. &quot;We’re trying to take over the world!&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> </span></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/102507_gillette.jpg?w=300&h=161" />On Wednesday night, a little after 7 pm, deep in the labyrinth that is the Metropolitan Museum of Art, past the line of photographers in the lobby, past the medieval statues of the Virgin Mary, past a mummy or two, and past a temporary installation that spelled out &quot;Fox Business&quot; in big block letters made, ostensibly, of green shrubbery, Regis Philbin gave Roger Ailes a hug.
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;This guy is famous in Ohio,&quot; said Mr. Philbin, oddly. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">NYTV moved in and shook hands. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Ailes asked good-naturedly if NYTV had written anything critical of Fox or Mr. Philbin, recently. Mr. Philbin fielded the question. &quot;He writes something critical of me,&quot; said Mr. Philbin, &quot;at least once a month.&quot; An exaggeration!</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Everyone smiled.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">We were there to celebrate the launch of Rupert Murdoch's latest media venture—the Fox Business Network.</span><span style="font-size: 8pt">  And so, a few feet away, alongside a makeshift bar, Mel Brooks was struggling to get Mr. Murdoch's attention. He had taken a bad angle. Only Mr. Murdoch's back was available. Mr. Brooks waited patiently. At last, the Media Mogul from Down Under shifted positions. Mr. Brooks moved in and put his hand around the back of Mr. Murdoch's head. &quot;Congratulations,&quot; said Mr. Brooks. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">He wasnt alone. In the large space surrounding the Temple of Dendur, (lit up festively in orange and blue lights for the occasion) a crowd of media, television, and business elites slurped down drinks, and formed a congratulatory conga line, leading up to Mr. Murdoch near the bar. <span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Nearby, Harvey Weinstein eyed the room. Oscar De La Renta kissed a woman on her cheek. New Fox star Alexis Glick circulated, shaking hands. Lloyd Grove hovered. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> Half an hour later, Mr. Ailes, sporting a dark suit and a red tie with white slanted stripes, took the stage. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;Some of you are wondering why we are in the Temple  of Dendur,&quot; said Mr. Ailes. &quot;So am I. Actually the temple was built in 15 BC by Emperor Augustus of Rome, sort of the Rupert Murdoch of his day. I said to Rupert, we're having an opening party at the Temple of Dendur. He said, Good I like that place. Is it for sale?&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">The crowd chuckled. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;Rupert Murdoch is so casual.  One day he said to me, you know CNBC needs competition,&quot; recalled Mr. Ailes. &quot;I said, uh oh, here we go. Because I was around when he said CNN needed some competition. And I was around when he said, I really like <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, it's a great paper. So if you're ever around Rupert and you hear these kind of casual comments, pretend you don't hear them because otherwise you're going to be working very hard.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Ailes then ceded the spotlight to Mr. Murdoch, calling him the &quot;greatest media visionary of all time.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Murdoch, dressed in a pin striped suit, and a dark necktie with white dots, stepped to the podium. &quot;It's been a brilliant first nine days,&quot; said Mr. Murdoch. &quot;It's been distinctive, it's been informative, it's been noisy. It's business news that grabs your attention and keeps it, whether you're a CEO or a small business owner. That's the brilliance of Roger Ailes.&quot;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Murdoch spoke optimistically of the &quot;triumphs of the free markets&quot; on a global scale.&quot;“In this country we have the best-run, the most corruption-free companies in the world,&quot; he said. &quot;Our companies have the kind of success and variety that the rest of the world looks to. Not that you would know that from much of the business coverage we see every day.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">He said that the Fox Business Network would cover the &quot;scandals and failures,&quot; that would come along now and then and would be &quot;just as tough as anyone protecting investors.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">&quot;But my hope for Fox Business is that it will also find time to celebrate the freedom and sense of optimism and daring that free markets have given Americans.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">The crowd applauded, and the party continued. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Around 8:30 or so, the Counting Crows took the stage. As they wailed through their first song, NYTV chatted with Cody Willard and Rebecca Gomez, hosts of Fox Business Network's evening talk show, <em>Happy Hour</em>, set in the Bull and Bear bar at the Waldorf </span><span style="font-size: 8pt">Astoria</span><span style="font-size: 8pt">.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">The Counting Crows weren't the shaggy-haired Mr. Willard's scene. <span> </span>Instead, he launched into a story about seeing Kiss in concert.<span>  </span>Twice, said Mr. Willard, he had dressed up as Gene Simmons for Halloween.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">He said he was having a great time at the party.<span>  </span>&quot;I love the fact that you see a huge sign for Fox Business in front of the Egyptian temple. That puts some perspective on what the vision is, right? You have the greatest empire of all time, the Egyptian empire…&quot; He paused. &quot;What's the name of this place?&quot;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-size: 8pt">Um, the Temple  of Dendur. </span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt">Mr. Willard continued, unfazed. &quot;That's what the vision is here,&quot; said Mr. Willard. &quot;We're trying to take over the world.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> He leaned back and smiled. &quot;We’re trying to take over the world!&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8pt"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/10/at-the-fbn-launch-partyfox-anchor-were-trying-to-take-over-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/102507_gillette.jpg?w=300&#38;h=161" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>CNBC&#8217;s Fast Money Races West</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/10/cnbcs-ifast-moneyi-races-west/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:50:34 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/10/cnbcs-ifast-moneyi-races-west/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/10/cnbcs-ifast-moneyi-races-west/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">Does San Jose, California qualify as Main Street, USA? </span>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Well, in any case, it’s several thousand miles from Wall Street. And on Friday, CNBC's <em>Fast Money with Dylan </em><span style="color: black"><em>Ratigan </em>will be broadcasting live from the Computer History Museum in San Jose, CNBC announced today. </span></span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">The cross-country brand extension, according to a CNBC press release, is part of a broader &quot;cradle of innovation tour.&quot; </span></span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">No word yet on how the Fox Business Network, which had suggested it plans to position itself as Main Street to CNBC's Wall Street,might counter.</span></span></span> </p>
<p><span style="color: black"></span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Although, the front lawn of, say, the Computer History Association of California, must look mighty tempting right about now.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">Does San Jose, California qualify as Main Street, USA? </span>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Well, in any case, it’s several thousand miles from Wall Street. And on Friday, CNBC's <em>Fast Money with Dylan </em><span style="color: black"><em>Ratigan </em>will be broadcasting live from the Computer History Museum in San Jose, CNBC announced today. </span></span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">The cross-country brand extension, according to a CNBC press release, is part of a broader &quot;cradle of innovation tour.&quot; </span></span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">No word yet on how the Fox Business Network, which had suggested it plans to position itself as Main Street to CNBC's Wall Street,might counter.</span></span></span> </p>
<p><span style="color: black"></span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Although, the front lawn of, say, the Computer History Association of California, must look mighty tempting right about now.</span></span></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/10/cnbcs-ifast-moneyi-races-west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>For Fox Business, Big Government Is Enemy Number One</title>

		<comments>http://observer.com/2007/10/for-fox-business-big-government-is-enemy-number-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:09:37 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://observer.com/2007/10/for-fox-business-big-government-is-enemy-number-one/</link>
			<dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.observer.com/2007/10/for-fox-business-big-government-is-enemy-number-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/foxbusiness2.jpg?w=300&h=173" />It was Monday morning, a few hours into the Fox Business Network’s first day on the air, and the new channel’s stocks editor, Liz MacDonald, was mugging for the cameras in front of a stand of trees somewhere in the vicinity of CNBC’s headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
<p class="text">“There’s a lot of government-looking kind of buildings, I think we heard a cow mooing in the distance,” she said. “But it’s hunting season, as we noted earlier, out here in Englewood Cliffs, and I heard the peacocks are in season.”</p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.1pt">It’s clear that in launching FBN, Rupert Murdoch has trained his sights on the well-primped tail feathers of CNBC. But judging from its first day, for Roger Ailes and company, the real big game appears to be big government, not big media.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.25pt">At one point, reporting from Washington, D.C., correspondent Adam Shapiro explained how federal earmarks to study shrimp and catfish showed that government spending has gotten out of hand. “Not that I have anything against shrimp and catfish,” Mr. Shapiro hastened to add. “Good-tasting stuff … but that’s how these things grow.”</span></p>
<p class="text">Soon, the new network pulled out the big gun of economic conservatism: Grover Norquist.</p>
<p class="text">For the next several minutes, Mr. Norquist—the right-wing activist who once gleefully announced he’d like to get government down to a size where it could be drowned in a bathtub—explained to FBN viewers how the various Democratic presidential candidates were likely to threaten the livelihood of Americans of all classes by repealing President Bush’s tax cuts and further increasing federal spending.</p>
<p class="text">“Obviously both Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Edwards are talking about spending perhaps two trillion dollars,” he said. “Not just the one trillion on health care, but they’ve made a number of promises in addition to that.”</p>
<p class="text">In recent months, much has been made of Mr. Murdoch’s assertion that while CNBC is geared towards Wall Street, FBN would appeal to Main Street.</p>
<p class="text">But lately, FBN executives have tweaked that claim, suggesting that FBN will seek to appeal to both camps. </p>
<p class="text">How to pull it off?</p>
<p class="text">On day one of FBN, a large part of the answer seemed to be constantly stoking the threat of higher taxes and runaway spending—a threat, after all, that should concern Wall Street brokers and Main Street business owners alike. In the months to come, look for Runaway Government to play a similar role on FBN to the one that Runaway Liberalism plays on the Fox News Channel—that is, as the sinister common enemy around which the audience can rally.</p>
<p class="text">But rallying the pin-striped masses also requires on-air talent, as Mr. Ailes understands. Early on, Alexis Glick, the former CNBC and <em>Today</em> show contributor turned FBN business news director and morning anchor, shone. The leggy former New York City high-school basketball star lit up the morning set, injecting her winsome sports fandom into programming across the slate, including a segment called “Stocks and Jocks” (in which guest analysts debated who would make a better CEO, Bill Belichick or Tony Dungy) and an oddly entertaining interview with New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft about his $5 million gift to the anemic Columbia University football program.</p>
<p class="text">Elsewhere in the lineup, Cody Willard, the long-locked co-host of FBN’s boozy evening banterfest <em>Happy Hour</em>, was already attracting the attention of competitors. Last night, MSNBC’s Dan Abrams devoted his Beat the Press segment to mocking Mr. Willard. “The Fox Business Channel started today,” said Mr. Abrams.<span>  </span>“And you know what? They’re just really cool. You know, like <em>Real World</em> and like <em>Beavis and Butt-Head</em>. Cool.” Abrams followed up with a clip of Maroon 5-ish–vibing Mr. Willard touting his “famous” one-liners. “Rock ’n’ roll,” added Mr. Abrams, dryly. “Yeah!”</p>
<p class="text">But throughout the day on FBN, the big bad faceless Feds remained the most reliable targets. A few hours after her peacock-hunting excursion, Ms. MacDonald was back in FBN’s Manhattan studios, across from anchor Connell McShane, weighing in on … the dangers of big government.</p>
<p class="text">“President Reagan once said that the closest thing to immortality is a government program,” said Ms. MacDonald. “It’s a super-size-me government going on, and I think it’s a problem.” As if viewers might not have gotten the message, she added: “Pat Buchanan said, ‘Like Thelma and Louise, Social Security and Medicare are heading right for that cliff, and taxpayers are in the back seat.’”</p>
<p class="text">The implication: Fox will put you in front.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/foxbusiness2.jpg?w=300&h=173" />It was Monday morning, a few hours into the Fox Business Network’s first day on the air, and the new channel’s stocks editor, Liz MacDonald, was mugging for the cameras in front of a stand of trees somewhere in the vicinity of CNBC’s headquarters in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
<p class="text">“There’s a lot of government-looking kind of buildings, I think we heard a cow mooing in the distance,” she said. “But it’s hunting season, as we noted earlier, out here in Englewood Cliffs, and I heard the peacocks are in season.”</p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.1pt">It’s clear that in launching FBN, Rupert Murdoch has trained his sights on the well-primped tail feathers of CNBC. But judging from its first day, for Roger Ailes and company, the real big game appears to be big government, not big media.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.25pt">At one point, reporting from Washington, D.C., correspondent Adam Shapiro explained how federal earmarks to study shrimp and catfish showed that government spending has gotten out of hand. “Not that I have anything against shrimp and catfish,” Mr. Shapiro hastened to add. “Good-tasting stuff … but that’s how these things grow.”</span></p>
<p class="text">Soon, the new network pulled out the big gun of economic conservatism: Grover Norquist.</p>
<p class="text">For the next several minutes, Mr. Norquist—the right-wing activist who once gleefully announced he’d like to get government down to a size where it could be drowned in a bathtub—explained to FBN viewers how the various Democratic presidential candidates were likely to threaten the livelihood of Americans of all classes by repealing President Bush’s tax cuts and further increasing federal spending.</p>
<p class="text">“Obviously both Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Edwards are talking about spending perhaps two trillion dollars,” he said. “Not just the one trillion on health care, but they’ve made a number of promises in addition to that.”</p>
<p class="text">In recent months, much has been made of Mr. Murdoch’s assertion that while CNBC is geared towards Wall Street, FBN would appeal to Main Street.</p>
<p class="text">But lately, FBN executives have tweaked that claim, suggesting that FBN will seek to appeal to both camps. </p>
<p class="text">How to pull it off?</p>
<p class="text">On day one of FBN, a large part of the answer seemed to be constantly stoking the threat of higher taxes and runaway spending—a threat, after all, that should concern Wall Street brokers and Main Street business owners alike. In the months to come, look for Runaway Government to play a similar role on FBN to the one that Runaway Liberalism plays on the Fox News Channel—that is, as the sinister common enemy around which the audience can rally.</p>
<p class="text">But rallying the pin-striped masses also requires on-air talent, as Mr. Ailes understands. Early on, Alexis Glick, the former CNBC and <em>Today</em> show contributor turned FBN business news director and morning anchor, shone. The leggy former New York City high-school basketball star lit up the morning set, injecting her winsome sports fandom into programming across the slate, including a segment called “Stocks and Jocks” (in which guest analysts debated who would make a better CEO, Bill Belichick or Tony Dungy) and an oddly entertaining interview with New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft about his $5 million gift to the anemic Columbia University football program.</p>
<p class="text">Elsewhere in the lineup, Cody Willard, the long-locked co-host of FBN’s boozy evening banterfest <em>Happy Hour</em>, was already attracting the attention of competitors. Last night, MSNBC’s Dan Abrams devoted his Beat the Press segment to mocking Mr. Willard. “The Fox Business Channel started today,” said Mr. Abrams.<span>  </span>“And you know what? They’re just really cool. You know, like <em>Real World</em> and like <em>Beavis and Butt-Head</em>. Cool.” Abrams followed up with a clip of Maroon 5-ish–vibing Mr. Willard touting his “famous” one-liners. “Rock ’n’ roll,” added Mr. Abrams, dryly. “Yeah!”</p>
<p class="text">But throughout the day on FBN, the big bad faceless Feds remained the most reliable targets. A few hours after her peacock-hunting excursion, Ms. MacDonald was back in FBN’s Manhattan studios, across from anchor Connell McShane, weighing in on … the dangers of big government.</p>
<p class="text">“President Reagan once said that the closest thing to immortality is a government program,” said Ms. MacDonald. “It’s a super-size-me government going on, and I think it’s a problem.” As if viewers might not have gotten the message, she added: “Pat Buchanan said, ‘Like Thelma and Louise, Social Security and Medicare are heading right for that cliff, and taxpayers are in the back seat.’”</p>
<p class="text">The implication: Fox will put you in front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://observer.com/2007/10/for-fox-business-big-government-is-enemy-number-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/foxbusiness2.jpg?w=300&#38;h=173" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
