Has the pop-statistics nonfiction genre reached a tipping point? One where the need to package statistical studies as amazing counter-intuitive revelations has outpaced the scientific method itself? In Scientific American two statisticians say yes: “We and others have noted a discouraging tendency in the Freakonomics body of work to present speculative or even erroneous claims with an air of certainty,” write Andrew Gelman and Kaiser Fung, two fellow statisticians who have dabbled in nonfiction. “Considering such problems yields useful lessons for those who wish to popularize statistical ideas.” Read More
The Last Frontier? Artists Are Running Out of Neighborhoods to Be Priced Out OfWork-Life Balance: California Producer Contracts for Flatiron Loft Listed at $3.5 M.Baa-Headed: Why Are There So Many Animal Decapitations in Brooklyn This Week?
Drew Friedman Chronicles America's Jewish ComediansMorning Media MixSimon & Schuster Cancels a Book Deal With an Elevator
A So-So Week for Opera: A Less-Than-‘Enchanted Island' at One MetTalk to the Hand: 'Hand to God' Stars One Scary Sock PuppetHe Said, She Said: 'The Open House' Has a Bullying Dad, 'Stage Kiss' Follows a Quirky Couple, 'Arlington' Is a Musical Monologue
Editorial: Obama’s Grand FailureEditorial: The Mayor and Ms. MoskowitzPaul Singer: Gay Marriage's Time Has Come
The Battle Is Over: U.S. Olympic Skier Chooses Date On the Basis of Her TweetsWhere to Find All the Free Food at SXSW 2014The 17 Best Life Lessons From Martha Stewart’s Reddit AMA
‘We Hope That She Offs Herself Soon So It’ll Be Worth a Lot of Money’: Five Minutes With Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka at the Armory Show26-by-17-Inch Wade Guyton Sells for $1 M. at Christie’sLadies’ Night: On the BHQF’s Record-Breaking Last Brucennial