Has the pop-statistics nonfiction genre reached a tipping point? One where the need to package statistical studies as amazing counter-intuitive revelations has outpaced the scientific method itself? In Scientific American two statisticians say yes: “We and others have noted a discouraging tendency in the Freakonomics body of work to present speculative or even erroneous claims with an air of certainty,” write Andrew Gelman and Kaiser Fung, two fellow statisticians who have dabbled in nonfiction. “Considering such problems yields useful lessons for those who wish to popularize statistical ideas.” Read More
De Blasio Says He Has No Regrets About Agency Staffing After East Harlem ExplosionCouncilman Says Explosion Exposes 'Dire Need' for Infrastructure ImprovementsPhotos From East Harlem Building Explosion
The Day So Many People in Media Got New Jobs Morning Media MixJohn Cook Leaves Gawker for Glenn Greenwald's The Intercept
'Sex Box,' The TV Show About Having Sex in a Box, is Coming to America (Video)'Unusually Thicke': The Blurred Lines of Faux-Celeb-RealityRHONY Season 6 Premiere: 'Is Not Our Character Revealed When the Chips Are Down?'
Editorial: Schneiderman, RevisitedEditorial: Samson Must ResignEditorial: Obama’s Grand Failure
I Spy: iPhones With Pre‐Loaded Surveillance Software Now Available in U.S.Playing Games CAPTCHA-Style to Skip Through Video AdsMarc Andreessen and Others Annotate Newsweek’s Bitcoin Story on Rap Genius
Morning Links: ‘I Woke Up Like This’ EditionOn View Right Now‘Robert Janitz: Stick Shift Heaven’ at Team Gallery